We should stop with this Harry Potter nonsense now..


Millions of American schoolchildren have a new subject in school: sorcery!

Through the Harry Potter series, the ancient occult practice of sorcery is being introduced in almost every public school in America. This video explains how Scholastic Inc., the largest publisher of children’s books in the world, is supplying Harry Potter materials to millions of schoolchildren. Scholastic Inc. is using its unrivaled position in the educational system to flood classrooms and libraries with wizardry, repackaged as “children’s fantasy literature.” Teachers are encouraged to read the Harry Potter books aloud in class, and millions of children are being densensitized to the dangers of the occult spirit world.

Through Harry’s world of sorcery they are learning the occultic tools — occult visualization and soulish mind power, wands, brooms, spells and curses.

In this video, you will see how completely occult is the world of Harry Potter. After reading the Harry Potter books, millions of children will demand to see Warner Bros. new movie, “Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone.”

Christian parents have faced a similar problem for years with the teaching of evolution in their public schools. They have responded by teaching their children that they cannot believe everything they are taught in school. Now, with the Harry Potter books on sorcery becoming part of public school curriculum, parents need to know enough about it to also teach their children that the spell-casting and other activities of Harry Potter are also forbidden territory. This video will help.


People need to learn the truth about J.K Rowlings. She’s an utter FRAUD and always has been. All the Harry Potter books were written by the wealthy Railroad speculator, RICHARD POTTER.  Richard linked to the Rothschilds and controlled by ultra powerful, Robert Cecil.  Please note his daughter was called Beatrix and was a massive Socialist. She married Sidney Webb who was also a Socialist. They have played a massive role in the Socialism of the United States by the controlling Coefficient Club organised by Sidney. Now Rowlings is not an author of these books she was simply an editor but trumped up as the author. Very devious craft books installing the craft into the minds of vulnerable children with predictive programming.



Tears as JK Rowling returns to where it began

By Chris Hastings, Arts and Media Editor
Last Updated: 1:36am GMT 26/12/2007

She is haunted by the “ghosts” of her troubled past, fears losing those closest to her and finds the success of the Harry Potter books so astonishing that she sometimes feels it is all a dream.

Despite being the most famous children’s author in the world and wealthier than the Queen, the author JK Rowling admits that she still cannot completely break free from her earlier poverty and the traumatic death of her mother.

Describing her life before Harry Potter as a “mess”, the writer, who is worth more than half a billion pounds, talks candidly about how her experiences have shaped almost every aspect of the best-selling books.

Taken back to the tiny front room of the rented Edinburgh tenement flat where she struggled to finish the first book, she bursts into tears at the memories it holds.

Rowling was living on state benefits in the flat with her youngest daughter, Jessica, after the breakdown of her first marriage and was still grieving her mother, Anne, who died from multiple sclerosis before the book was completed.

Choking back her emotions, she says: “It was my life and it was very hard and I didn’t know there was going to be this fairy-tale resolution. This room is full of ghosts.”

The writer allowed herself to be filmed for an ITV documentary that followed her for a year as she completed the final book, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows.

She talks openly about her past and is persuaded to revisit her former home, which she rented after the failure of her marriage to a Portuguese journalist, Jorge Arantes. The writer, who had battled with depression, says the flat was “really where I turned my life around completely”.

Even now she finds her success so remarkable that: “Some days I do feel like, ‘Is it real?’ ”

The mother of two tells fellow writer James Runcie, who made the documentary: “I feel I really became myself here, in that everything was stripped away, I’d made such a mess of things. But that was freeing, so I just thought, ‘Well, I want to write’, and I wrote the book and what is the worst than can happen? It gets turned down by every publisher in Britain, big deal.”

Rowling, who was 28 when she moved to Scotland in late 1993, also reveals that her mother’s terminal illness has heavily influenced the constant theme of death in her writing and talks of her decision not to kill off the boy wizard in his final battle with Voldemort. “In some ways it would have been a neat ending to kill him. But I felt that would have been a betrayal, because I wanted my hero, and he is my hero, to do what I think is the most noble thing. So he came back from war.”

In another scene, Rowling and her sister Jo are shown looking at old photographs from their childhood in Gloucestershire. The pictures bring back a flood of memories and the girls joke about their “tragic childhood haircuts” and their clothes. Rowling now owns a £6.5 million Georgian home in Kensington, West London, a country house on the banks of the River Tay near Aberfeldy and another house in Edinburgh.

In JK Rowling… A Year In The Life, the author is shown putting the finishing touches to the last book, which was released in July. In contrast to her earlier poverty, Rowling and her second husband, Dr Neil Murray, are shown flying to America by private jet so they can attend the book’s launch there.

In another interview for the internet fan site The Leaky Cauldron, released last week, Rowling talks about her next project, a Harry Potter encyclopedia, which she warns might take 10 years to complete.

She says: “I absolutely do intend to do it, but I can’t pretend I’m in a hurry right now. It’s going to be an awful lot of work, but I have kept everything.

“There is no point in doing it unless it is amazing. The last thing I want to do is to rush ­something out”.

Coefficients Club: Window on the High Cabal?

“H.G. Wells was one of the few socialists who claimed to see big business, and multinational corporations in particular, as the forerunners of a World Socialist State”

Fall 1993

Reprinted from The Project
Fall 1993-Winter 93-94, Volume X, Number 4

The Coefficients Club was organized by Beatrice Webb, the co-ruler of the Fabian Society with her husband Sidney Webb, to bring together the most powerful movers and shakers of the British Establishment with social critics and idealists to discuss and chart the future of British Empire and its relationship to social reform. Among other things, the accounts of its deliberations offered by such luminaries as Bertrand Russell and H. G. Wells prove beyond any doubt that Fabian Socialism, contrary to surface impressions that it was the enemy of the British Oligarchy, was one of the Oligarchy’s most prized instruments for world rule.

Coefficients included:

Sir Edward Grey,
Bertrand Russell,
Sidney and Beatrice Webb,
Leo Maxse (who advocated war with Germany already in 1902),
Clinton Dawkins of the City,
Carlyon Bellairs of the Navy,
Pember Reeves,
W. A. S. Hewins,
L. S. Amery,
H. J. Mackinder,
Lord Robert Cecil,
Lord Arthur Balfour,
Michael Sadler,
Henry Newbolt,
Lord Alfred Milner,
John Hugh Smith,
J. Birchenough of the City,
Josiah Wedgwood (the single taxer),
John Hugh Smith,
Colonel Repington,
F. S. Oliver, and
C. F. G. Masterman.

The main focus of the Webb’s Coefficients appeared to center on determining the strategy best suited to defending and expanding the “liberal” British Empire against the increasingly aggressive encroachments of Germany since it had become unified under the leadership of militarist Prussia in then recent decades. Wells and other idealists argued that “The British Empire . . . had to be the precursor of a world-state or nothing . . . It was possible for the Germans and Austrians to hold together in their Zollverein (tariff and trade bloc) because they were placed like a clenched fist in the centre of Europe. But the British Empire was like an open hand all over the world. It had no natural economic unity and it could maintain no artificial economic unity. Its essential unity must be a unity of great ideas embodied in the English speech and literature.” (Experiment in Autobiography by H. G. Wells, page 652.) Wells identified Coefficient member Edward Grey as a promoter of the opposing British strategy of provoking Germany to attack France, without adequate warning of consequent British intervention, so that Germany could be laid low sooner than later while the British Navy was still supreme. Lord Grey was the highly influential Foreign Minister for Britain in the years preceding WWI who persuaded a reluctant cabinet that Britain should enter the war because of German violation of Belgian neutrality. (Experiment in Autobiography by H. G. Wells page 659.)

Though given a respectful hearing behind closed doors in the Coefficient Club, Wells and his “utopians” were temporarily overruled by the official British policy of meeting head-on the German threat to the traditional British orchestrated European “balance of power.” Britain, by aping the ultra-statist protectionist economics and severe militarism of Germany and by purposely setting-up entangling alliances, made the carnage of the Great War (WWI) inevitable. This was clear to the disapproving Bertrand Russell in 1902 and caused him to quit the Coefficients in a huff, informing Grey (not then in office) that his proposals would lead to war and tyranny.

From The Autobiography of Bertrand Russell Volume I, page 230

“…in 1902, I became a member of a small dining club called the Coefficients, got up by Sidney Webb for the purpose of considering political questions from a more or less Imperialist point of view. It was in this club that I first became acquainted with H. G. Wells, of whom I had never heard until then. His point of view was more sympathetic to me than that of any member. Most of the members, in fact, shocked me profoundly. I remember Amery’s eyes gleaming with blood-lust at the thought of a war with America, in which, as he said with exultation, we should have to arm the whole adult male population. One evening Sir Edward Grey (not then in office) made a speech advocating the policy of Entente, which had not yet been adopted by the Government. I stated my objections to the policy very forcibly, and pointed out the likelyhood of its leading to war, but no one agreed with me, so I resigned from the Club. It will be seen that I began my opposition to the first war at the earliest possible moment.”

However, it appears that Wells’ “utopian” prescriptions for a British orchestrated World State were ultimately adopted with a vengeance once the lessons of WWI and WWII were learned and the unbearable costs of “official Empire” finally became clear to even the most stubborn Imperialists. It is less clear if Wells’ policies were adopted as a new facade for covert British Imperialism, a cynical rationalization for constant destabilization congruent with such covert rule, a sincere attempt to create a World State, or some combination of the three. Two views of Wells’ own motivations are also possible. When exposed to the reality and inner workings of the High Cabal of the British Empire through the Coefficients, did he consciously sell-out his idealistic belief in socialism and use his familiarity with radical socialist thought to tailor a cynical propaganda program useful to the “Great Pirates” (see the review of Buckminster Fuller’s Critical Path in this issue for the source of this new epithet we shall be applying to the conspiracy) upon whom his literary success depended . . . or was the process of boot licking subconscious? One thing is certain, H.G. Wells was one of the few socialists who claimed to see big business, and multinational corporations in particular, as the forerunners of a World Socialist State.

In any case, Wells effectively described the policies in most respects still being effectuated by the Anglo-American Elite. Students of the ruling class/conspiracy need to study Wells’ work in detail if they want to know where we are headed and why. The best statement of H. G. Wells’ “utopian” program for moving from World Imperialism to World Government is his sinister novel, The Shape of Things to Come, though his Experiment in Autobiography, The Open Conspiracy, and The New World Order have a lot to offer for the discerning reader as well. We will begin this effort by summarizing a few of the major themes to be found in The Shape of Things to Come:

Note: Please turn now to the review of The Shape of Things to Come in the Recommended Reading Up-dates section of this newsletter so that the major
theme of the book, the protracted war from 1940-1966 that allows Wells “Air Dictatorship” to come to power over a prostrate world, does not have
to be restated here. Please take note of the Wellsian attitude toward “environmentalism” also.

1. Crime, Gangs, and Civil Disorder. Wells predicted an intractable increase in crime, gang warfare, and civil disorder until his “modern world state” became a reality. Wells came as close in this area as anywhere else in “giving away his propaganda game”. On page 143 Wells states, “And then, as the greater community of the World State began to struggle clumsily and painfully out of traditional forms, we see police control again out paced by its task. It gives way. ‘Why,’ the student asks, ‘was this police organization unable to keep pace with the new stresses’.” The obvious answer would be that the Brave New World Order agenda, or movement for social change, is essentially destructive and to blame it for the accelerating degeneration of society. But no! Wells spends pages blaming the limitations of individualism, capitalism, religion, and nationalism for the breakdown and postulating world government as the “only hope” for order. It is clear that this philosophy of blaming traditional forces, that in spite of their imperfections, have been compatible with order for centuries for the increasing disorder instead of the new philosophy remains the successful propaganda line of the New World (dis)Order.

2. War and International Disorder. Wells actually had some knowledge of the possibility of nuclear power, but made no mention of it in this book and apparently did not foresee the nuclear stalemate of 1946-1989 which gave the world some respite from the exhaustion of perpetual war which he postulated. However, with the dissolution of the Soviet Union and the examples of Yugoslavia, Somalia, South Africa, India-Pakistan, etc. in front of us, it is possible that his projected “30 year war” may run from 1990 to 2016 instead of from 1940 to 1966.

Wells has a long section on Henry Ford’s “Peace Ship”, a public relations device by which the great industrialist tried to bring WWI to early conclusion. While giving no publicity to Ford’s central contention that Wells’ mentors, the “Great Pirates” or “International Bankers” were promoting WWI as part of their destructive program for “war profits” and a New World Order, Wells shows how Ford’s efforts were doomed to failure not because they would be ridiculed unmercifully by the power of his mentors over the press, but because the evil forces of individualism and capitalism would force the great industrialist into war production for a profit. In fact, if Ford had not been run off the stage by the Anglophile Eastern Establishment press, he might have achieved something!

3. The Money Question. Wells takes a firm position against the usury and tight money policies of “high finance” and for the easy money policies of “Social Credit” as promoted in Britain and the Commonwealth by C. H. Douglas, crack-pot conspiracy theory advocate (one of us!) who Wells actually goes so far as to mention by name! Of course, Wells fails to mention that his mentors, the most powerful usurers of all time who hold the world’s credit in their hands and manipulated the great crash of 1929 which triggered the Great Depression, create boom and bust cycles to maintain their dominant world position.

4. Education/Social Nucleation. One of the great mysteries of Wells’ book is his apparently imaginary author, Gustave De Windt who wrote Social Nucleation, supposedly in 1942, a book that solved the final theoretical problems in creating the Modern World State. Wells states that the book, “was the first exhaustive study of the psychological laws underlying team play and esprit de corps . . .” Wells pictures De Windt’s ideas having the impact of a Marx, Plato, Darwin, or Adam Smith, sweeping away the social rubbish of the past including family, religion, ethnicity, tribe, and patriotism and smoothly replacing it with New World Order socialization patterns. There can be little doubt that De Windtian ideas inform Deweyite Progressive Education and, more recently, Outcome Based Education. On a deeper level, De Windt has created a technology of “macrobe” or “social organism” building for the “Air Dictatorship. One can only wonder if Wells had a specific psychologist in mind, perhaps the German Wundt who prefigured behaviorism?

5. The Martyrdom of Man by Winwood Reade. As we have mentioned before, ultra social Darwinist Winwood Reade was Cecil Rhodes’ “Ayn Rand and Jules Verne” rolled-up into one. On page 108 Wells pays sly tribute to this mentor by mentioning Winwood Reade, though he claims in his autobiography never to have met Rhodes personally. On this page Wells also attempts a lame justification of his mentor’s advocacy of worldwide carnage, disorder, and suffering on the basis of an abundance of happiness in the future Modern World State.

6. Non-Lethal Weapons. Non-lethal “peace gas” was portrayed as the supreme weapon of the “Airmen”. In fact, the miraculous gas was used to put an end to the influence of the Pope! Though the conspiracy has, of yet, done little of proven value in this area (ask David Koresh), it is interesting to note that Newsweek of February 7, 1994 ran an article titled Soon ‘Phasers on Stun’: A new generation of nonlethal weapons may help rout mobs, subdue gunmen, even win wars–without killing the innocent. The possible application to UN “Peace-Keeping” did not go unnoticed.

One must ask, “What will be the ultimate results of the Wellsian program for the High Cabal and for the World?”

First, I continue to be amazed with the continuing success of the conspiracy in blaming society’s increasing problems and crises on the Wellsian scapegoats: private property rights and sovereign nationhood. As the conspiracy continues its systematic destruction of existing social structures, allegedly to create Wells’ formless “social magma” it sees as a precondition for its future, no where in sight, totally unproven, and probably imaginary program of “social re- nucleation”, it is, of course, the cause of the current disorder, not the remedy for it.

Though many conservatives, libertarians, and other mostly non-socialist ideologists see this clearly, society as a whole still sees the conspiracy’s “movement for social change” as a case by case attempt to cure, not as the problem itself! Thus, we can safely predict that severe social disorder will continue and probably intensify world-wide for the foreseeable future with the mythical Brave New World reconstruction no where in sight. Some like to predict total breakdown and chaos as the ultimate result of this process, however, all the parasitic conspiracy needs to do to arrest a too drastic breakdown of its “host” is to periodically back off on the pressure! Order automatically reasserts itself through the agencies of private capitalism and even national politics, imperfect as as it is. Thus, like Orwell, we can see the High Cabal’s boot stamping forever on the face of humanity, stubbornly preventing possible evolution toward peace, justice, and progress as required to maintain its unchallenged, parasitic position of “Great Pirate”. We won’t hold our breath for the arrival of Wells utopia, The Modern World State.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: