Archive for the ‘POPERY AND SECRET SOCIETIES’ Category

Patronymic Paralogy

May 16, 2017

Patronymic Paralogy
Your Name Under Their Law – 137 pages
http://www.ptshamrock.com/your_name_under_the_law.pdf

The United States Citizen General immunities pertaining to prosecutors, judges and government agents
1.)
Prosecutor may violate civil rights
in initiating prosecution and presenting case.
– United States Supreme Court in
Imbler v. Pachtman
z
424 U.S.
409 (1976)
2.)
Immunity extends to all activities closely associated with litigation or potential
litigation.
– Second Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in
Davis v. Grusemever, 996 F.2d 617
(1993)
3.)
Prosecutor may knowingly use false testimony and suppress evidence. – United
States Supreme Court in
Imbler v. Pachtman, 424 U.S. 409 (1976)
4.)
Prosecutor may file charges without any investigation.
– Eighth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in
Myers v. Morris, 810 F.2d 1337 (1986)
5.)
Prosecutor may file charges outside of his jurisdiction.
– Eighth Circuit Federal Court of appeal in
Myers v. Morris, 840 F.2d 1337 (1986)
6.)
Prosecutor may knowingly offer perjured testimony.
– Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in
Jones v. Shankland, 800 F.2d 1310
(1987)
7.)
Prosecutor can suppress exculpatory evidence. (Exculpatory defined: Evidence
showing one innocent)
– Fifth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in
Henzel v. Gertstein, 608 F.2d 654 (1979)

8.)
Prosecutors are immune from lawsuit for conspiring
with judges to determine
outcome of judicial proceedings.
– Ninth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in
Ashelman v. Pope, 793 E.2d 1072 (1986)
9.)
Prosecutor may knowingly file charges against innocent persons for a crime that
never occurred.
– Tenth Circuit Federal Court of Appeal in
Norton v. Liddell, 620 F.2d 1375 (1980)
Ignorantia juris non excusat or
Ignorantia legis neminem excusat
(Latin for
“ignorance of the law does not excuse” or “ignorance of the law excuses no one”) is a
legal principle holding that a person who is unaware of a law may not escape liability for
violating that law merely because he or she was unaware of its content.

Advertisements

Who Owns Agenda 2030-2050-Population Objectivity of Subjects Conclusion Set Date 2100?

May 13, 2017

The mechanism and origins of economic inequality are to be found with the Vatican.. All roads lead to Rome.. UNICEP-UNEP-Agenda 2100 Sustainable development is their inquisition of eugenics.. Unfortunately while u.s. subjects can read the international documents evidence. They fail to comprehend what the words / terms are implying.. The document[s] is specifically calling for depopulation.. I am referring to the Agenda 21 document, the United Nations Environmental “Global” Biodiversity Assessment.. The number one problem of course being people, subjects specifically called direct drivers of environmental destruction, causing eco system collapse via Climate Change.. All lies of course as they are manipulating the destruction and misplacing the blame of the cause onto the worlds mass populace..

Economic restrictions are not being implemented by wolves nor grizzly bears.. Nor controlled opposition environmental groups..

The bears and wolves can be managed/controlled.. Obviously governmental public office holders representing who they serve who is not the subjects negatively effected by these various U.N. documents are the real storm troopers delivering heavy Agenda 2100 economic bombing.. Carpet bombing every aspect of how people make their livings into oblivion.. The wolves and bears are a cute distraction.. In their massive campaign of distractions.. This is not only effecting farming, ranching nor hunting.. It is everything economical, it is in everything, building codes, plumbing/heating/electrical all housing.. In everything..ALL ASPECTS of any business.

“…reduce their persons to perpetual slavery…and to convert them to his and their use and profit”—Bull Romanus Pontifex (Nicholas V), January 8, 1455

Those who discover sustainable developments true meaning will be deemed arbiters of “fake news” and silenced – censured, ignored.. While those who misinterpret it will be rewarded..

SWW is fourth grade propaganda level Gate-keeping fake opposition…Nothing more.. A huge disappointment..

AGENDA 2030 – A CALL TO ACTION

Agenda 21’s eugenics programme of worldwide ‘preparedness’ having been finalised, calls for its eugenicist ambitions to be put into ‘action’ with its successor, Agenda 2030, primed and ready to do just that; whose programme into action for the eugenicist depopulation of the Earth has been officially announced by the Holy See as law at the General Assembly of the United Nations on the 25th of September 2015.

It must be understood that when the Holy See gave his climate-change encyclical – preceeding his appearance at the United Nations – as well as his speech at the United Nations General Assembly, that his encyclical is an ecclesiastical letter as ‘actual law’ for all of the Churches fictitious jurisdictions. Together with his official pronouncements as ‘law’ given at the United Nations General Assembly, these both quite rightly are to be taken as ‘personally owned private laws’ for fictitious jurisdictional territories.

We read last paragraph, that –

“In the early centuries the term encyclical was applied, not only to papal letters…”

Source:

Encyclical
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/05413a.htm

Letters of the popes:

We read from the 1st paragraph –

“The popes began early, by virtue of the primacy, to issue laws as well for the entire Church as for individuals. This was done in the form of letters. Such letters were sent by the popes either of their own will or when application was made to them by synods, bishops, or individual Christians.”

We also read and learn –

“Following the example of the Roman emperors the popes soon established archives (scrinium) in which copies of their letters were placed as memorials for further use, and as proofs of authenticity.”

Source:

Ecclesiastical Letters
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/09202a.htm

~

The Pope is an example of a Roman emperor –

Source:

EYE OF NEWT, TOE OF FROG – ACT III
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/12/29/eye-of-newt-toe-of-frog-act-iii/

From Chapter 2, entitled, The Crown of the Cæsars Passes to the Papacy, we read,

The Roman Church, without dispute, had by 538 inherited the seat of the Caesars, as Adolf Harnack recorded in his book What is Christianity?,

It [the Papacy] is a political creation, and as imposing as a World-Empire, because of the continuation of the Roman Empire. The Pope, who calls himself “King” and “Pontifex Maximus” is Caesar’s successor. (New York, Putnam, 1901, second edition, page 270).

The same historian concluded that—

The Roman Church in its way privily pushed itself into the place of the Roman World-Empire, of which it is the actual continuation. (Ibid.)

Alexander Clarence Flick in his historical work, The Rise of the Mediaeval Church, concluded that,

The mighty Catholic Church was little more than the Roman Empire baptised. Rome was transformed as well as converted. The very capital of the old Empire became the capital of the Christian Empire. The office of the Pontifex Maximus was continued in that of the Pope. . . . Even the Roman language has remained the official language of the Roman Catholic Church down through the ages. (New York: Burt Franklin, 1959 pp 148, 149).

http://www.sundaylaw.net/books/other/standish/twobeasts/tb02.htm

SOURCES & ALTERNATIVE SOURCES FOR READINGS IN CHURCH HISTORY

What is Christianity? (1957) by Harnack, Adolf von, 1851-1930, New York, Harper 1901
https://archive.org/details/whatischristian01saungoog

Adolf Harnack – German historian and theologian
http://www.ccel.org/ccel/harnack

Adolf von Harnack
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adolf_von_Harnack

~

Divine Right of Kings

If we consider that all men are ‘equally endowed’ by nature’s Cause with ‘innate freewill’, then the information we find in reading what is said about the Divine Right of Kings, as well as what is said concerning ‘the Church’, is something of a curiosity, since the Will of God, we would reasonably deduce in relation to man, is quite clear when it comes to all men everywhere – who are endowed with ‘an equal measure of freewill before nature’s Cause or nature’s God’, without exception in the realm of the physical world.

The source of a rebellion to what man sees as God’s Will, on the matter of freewill, would not be God as the source of rebellion contradicting Himself; we would reasonably deduce regarding ‘equal freewill’ in all men, but the source of rebellion, if we look to Heaven for heavenly authority and the source of what God would not make absurd in us, would then be an alternative to God’s Authority and the use by men of that ‘alternative authority’, in making ‘absurd’, equal innate freewill endowed by nature’s Cause or nature’s God in all men.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Divine_right_of_kings

RULE THYSELF LEST YE BE RULED
https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2014/01/22/rule-thyself-lest-ye-be-ruled/

~

EUGENICS AS A MEANS OF CLEANSING

Etymology of Purgatory

in Latin, “means of cleansing,”

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=purgatory

~

Etymology of Purge

note noun.-

“that which purges,”

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=purge&allowed_in_frame=0

~

Definition of Purge

1.4 Law Atone for or wipe out

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/purge

~

Definition of Purgative

Origin

from the verb purgare (see purge)

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/purgative

~

Etymology of Purgatory

past participle stem of Latin purgare (see purge (v.)

http://www.etymonline.com/index.php?term=purgatory

~

Definition of Atone

verb

Make amends or reparation

Example

a human sacrifice to atone for the sin

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/atone#atone__2

~

The Roots and Origins of Eugenics belong to the Self-Ennobling Ones and their Self-validating Clergy’s Doctrines

We read, 1st paragraph of Catholic doctrine –

Purgatory (Lat., “purgare”, to make clean, to purify) in accordance with Catholic teaching is a place or condition of temporal punishment for those who, departing this life in God’s grace, are, not entirely free from venial faults, or have not fully paid the satisfaction due to their transgressions.

Source:

Purgatory
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/12575a.htm

Comment.-

Where are people to be found in purgatory ?

Purgatory happens in a space between Heaven(that is, ‘this life in God’s grace’) and Hell; purgatory is the temporal corporeal, or physical world, where people are to be found in a temporal condition of life, in the here and now

~

Definition of Transgression

noun

1. 1. (Law) a breach of a law, etc;

sin or crime

http://www.thefreedictionary.com/transgression

~

Definition of Temporal
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/temporal

~

Definition of Corporeal
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/corporeal

~

The Catholic Church’s definition of Space (or a Place):

We read, end of 5th paragraph –

“Space is therefore as real, as objective, as the corporeal world itself, but in itself it exists apart only in the human mind, seeing that in the reality of existing things it is only the extension of bodies themselves.”

Source:

Space
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/14167a.htm

Comment.-

Space is the temporal corporeal world itself if it is said to be as real as the corporeal world itself. When we use our eyes we are made aware of reality outside of our mind alone, that is what our eyes are for. And of course, the mind is made viable and enabled by the reality of existing things as literally ‘us’, and in that respect, the mind is ‘only the extension of bodies themselves’.

~

Image of a fiery purgatory by Annibale Carracci

Source:

Purgatory
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Purgatory

Definition of Purgatory

Noun

1. – a place or state of suffering inhabited by the souls of sinners who are expiating their sins before going to heaven

Adjective

archaic

Having the quality of cleansing or purifying:

Example –

infernal punishments are purgatory and medicinal

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/purgatory

~

Definition of Infernal

Adjective

1. Relating to or characteristic of hell or the underworld

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/infernal#infernal__2

~

Definition of Expiate (Expiating)

Make amends or reparation for (guilt or wrongdoing):

Example –

their sins must be expiated by sacrifice

~

Definition of Sacrifice

Noun

1. An act of slaughtering an animal or person or surrendering a possession as an offering to a deity:

Examples –

they offer sacrifices to the spirits

the ancient laws of animal sacrifice

1.1 An animal, person, or object offered in the act of sacrifice

Verb

1. Offer or kill as a religious sacrifice

Example –

the goat was sacrificed at the shrine

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/sacrifice#sacrifice__2

~

Definition of Shrine

Noun

1. A place regarded as holy because of its associations with a divinity or a sacred person or relic, marked by a building or other construction

http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/english/shrine#shrine__2

This excellent compilation of evidence was done by There Is No Debt..

What In The Balloon World Is Going On?

May 8, 2017

Stratospheric Balloons
http://ravenaerostar.com/products/stratospheric-balloons/zero-pressure-balloons

Quote by Rob Skiba
Some of you know I’ve been working with a few other guys to do a high-altitude weather balloon test with cameras fitted with NON-FISH-EYE LENSES. We’re trying to get a balloon from the same company that did the Red Bull jump. They are holding us up at the moment though.
So, my friend has been trying to follow up. In the meantime, he tells me that he was looking into long range antennas so that we can stream our footage live when the balloon goes up. The guy on the phone from the antenna company asked if we were working with “that other company”? To which my friend asks, which other company. The other guy went silent, then said to never mind. So, of course my friend became curious.
My friend then called a friend of his who is a colonel in the Air Force. In the course of casual conversation, he inquired if his friend had any knowledge of some comprehensive, high-altitude balloon tests involving long range communication capabilities. His Air Force buddy informed my friend that, yes, there is “a company” that has TENS OF THOUSANDS of balloons up in the 60,000 – 150,000 ft altitude range. And it has caused some problems for the Air Force. Hmmmm.
OK. There are currently tens of THOUSANDS of large high altitude balloons above us right now. That number is expected to go well into the hundreds of thousands in the very near future. And then you see sites like this, which have incidentally been around – coincidentally – since 1959 (or in other words since the year after NASA was formed): http://ravenaerostar.com/…/stratosph…/zero-pressure-balloons
Note, this site states things like:
“In dozens of flight operations per year, virtually every customer payload has been successfully flown and returned to the customer for data analysis. We have a success rate of over 95% with NASA’s payloads of over 6,000 pounds.”
6,000 POUND PAYLOADS floating above our heads on balloons?? Yep.
When you let this FACT set in, you will immediately realize how much you need to rethink your beliefs of “satellites” allegedly “in orbit” above us.

End Skiba quote…

Googles Fleet Of High Altitude Balloons
Can Google’s Fleet of High-Altitude Balloons Bring the Internet to the World’s Unconnected?
“Eventually, Project Loon hopes to put in place a band of balloons around latitudes in the Southern Hemisphere, creating a continuous circle of coverage.”

Skiba Quote;
To give Internet to remote places. Real story? Because for whatever reason NASA can’t find their own stuff when it goes in that direction (e.g. a space shuttle or the Orion capsule going over the Indian Ocean). Funny. I thought we had THOUSANDS of satellites orbiting the Earth. So, why then can’t NASA find their own stuff in the so-called Southern Hemisphere? Why aren’t planes tracked there either? What’s up with that? Well… have no fear. Soon, balloons will do what satellites can’t.

End Skiba quote…

More Evidence Who Owns The British American Colonies

May 6, 2017

By Craig Oxley

The government and legal system of the United States is totally controlled by the Crown. I have also stated that the British Monarch is not the Crown. The Crown is the Inner City of London, which is an independent State in London belonging to the Vatican system. It is a banking cartel which has a massive system around and beneath, which hides its true power The City is in fact the Knights Templar Church, also known as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment. The Temple grounds are also home to the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row. The CrownTemple controls the Global ‘Legal’ system, including those in the United States, Canada, Australia, and much more; this is because all Bar Associations are franchises of the International Bar Association at the Inns of Court at CrownTemple based at Chancery Lane in London.

All Bar Associations are franchises of the Crown and all Bar Attorneys/ Barristers throughout the world pledge a solemn oath to the Temple, even though many may not be aware that this is what they are doing. Bar Association ‘licensed’ Solicitors / Barristers must keep to their Oath, Pledge and terms of allegiance to the CrownTemple if they are to be “called to the Bar” and work in the legal profession. The ruling Monarch is also subordinate to the Crown Temple, this as been so since the reign of King John in the 13th century when Royal Sovereignty was transferred to the Crown Temple and, through this, to the Roman Church. King John 1167-1216 is the key to this deception.

It was at the Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court in January 1215 that King John was faced with the demands of the French/English Barons in England (mainly French), to confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. When he signed the Magna Carta in 1215 history records this as an event that extended human freedom, but the real affect was very different as we shall see. The governments of the USA, Canada, Australia and more are subsidiaries of the Crown Temple and so is the US Central Bank the Federal Reserve, as are all Central Banks on the Planet and including the IMF` World Bank. Bar Associations are awarded their franchises by the Four Inns of Court at Temple Bar.

{Magna Carta was nullified by the Pope as it was done under duress via sword held to King Johns throat.}

These are the InnerTemple, MiddleTemple, Lincolns Inn and Greys Inn and they are nothing less than elite secret societies without charters or statutes. They are the law unto themselves. The InnerTemple controls the legal system franchise for Canada and Britain while the MiddleTemple does the same for the United States. Queen Elizabeth II is a member of both Temples. At least five signatories to the American Declaration of Independence were Temple Bar Attorneys who had pledged allegiance to the Crown! Another MiddleTemple operative during the formation of the USA was Alexander Hamilton who structured the American Banking system to fulfil the Crown Temples agenda for total control of the United States. So in truth a State wherever it is on this planet, is a legal entity of the TempleCrown, or a Crown Colony. A man named Michael Edwards wrote: “Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent nation states, but they never were nor are today. They were and still are |Colonies of the CrownTemple, through letters patent and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the rule and order of the CrownTemple.

A legal state is a CrownTemple Colony.” “Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The CrownTemple owns America through the deception of those who have sworn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Temple Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attorneys rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful Taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but’ legal’, orders, rules and codes of the Crown Temple Courts, or so called ‘Judiciary’ in America. This is because the CrownTemple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North America.” Seven Middle Inn Templars who had pledged an oath of allegiance to the CrownTemple (including Alexander Hamilton) were among the members of the Constitutional Convention who signed the completed ‘American Constitution’.

How symbolic it is that copies of the American Constitution and the Declaration of Independence hang on the wall of the MiddleTemple in London. It’s not that surprising when you consider this Temple controlled both sides in these shenanigans. So while the Middle Bar Templars were orchestrating the illusion of freedom from the perceived rule by King George III, the King too, was a sworn member of the same Temple. Michael Edwards continues: “1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the CrownTemple. Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called ‘States’ as direct possessive estates of the Crown. “The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown.

Proof that the colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word ‘State’ to signify a ‘legal estate of possession.’ Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution would have been written using the word ‘States’. By the use of ‘State’, the significance of government of estate possessions was legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of America. Who controls the Crown? On May 15th 1213, King John, puppet of the Knights Templar, effectively signed away the Kingdom of England and Ireland to Pope Innocent III and the Roman Church, witnessed by the Crown Templars. As King John said at the time: “I myself bearing witness in the house of the Knights Templars.” The King John Charter said: “ We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal… not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and by common councel of our Barons, do offer and freely concede to God and his Holy Apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman Church, and to our lord Pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom of Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances… we perform and swear fealty for them to him are aforesaid lord pope Innocent, and his Catholic successors and the Roman Church…

binding our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in a similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at the time, and to the Roman church without demur. As a sign… we will and establish perpetual obligation and concession… from the proper and especial revenues of our aforesaid kingdoms… the Roman church shall receive yearly a thousand marks sterling… saving to us and to our heirs our rights, liberties and regalia; all of which things, as they have been described above, we wish to have perpetually valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our successors not to act counter to them. And if we or any of our successors shall presume to attempt this, whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come to his kingdom, and his senses, he shall lose his right to the kingdom, and this charter of our obligation and concession shall always remain firm.” Now it gets interesting. Historical accounts concentrate the fact that this charter obliged the Crown to pay money to the Roman Church, but it also states that if the terms of the charter are broken, the ‘right to the kingdom’ shall be lost. When King John signed the Magna Carter on June 15th 1215 he broke the terms of the charter with the Pope and therefore lost the right to his Kingdom. Pope Innocent III then declared the Magna Carter null and void. From this time the ‘Crown’ passed from the Monarch to the Knights Templar who to this day, governs Britain on behalf of the Roman IlluminatiChurch. The St Clair’s now Sinclair are the initial directors of this link of Templar and Rome in the British Isles as they took hold in Scotland at the time of the 1066 Norsemen-Norman invasion. This means, if we take it a stage further, that ultimately, through the CrownTemple, the Roman system also owns the United States, Canada and all countries and Bar associations controlled both overtly and covertly by the Crown. This is why the Peace Treaty between the American Colonies and the British Crown in 1783, stated:

“It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the third, by the grace of God, King of Great Britain, France and Ireland, defender of the faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc… and of the United States of America…”

And for the Irony, a Roman Catholic is barred from being the British Monarch while all along the Monarch and the Kingdom have been owned by the system that is Rome. The Queen is the Grand Patroness of Freemasonry. She is served by the 390 members of the Privy Council which connects with its equivalent in all other Commonwealth Countries. The Privy Council is ‘LEGALLY’ above Parliament because of its prerogative powers. Its members, who are appointed for life, include Prince Philip, Prince Charles, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Prime Minister and many others. They hold nine official meetings each year and the government (Crown) minister’s stand to attention while the Queen is told of the government measures they are asking the Queen to approve, which are nothing other than what the Crown dictates via the elected leader and via the Whips of whichever political party has power…

After taking their bow to the Queen and shaking her hand they are sworn to conduct their business in the utmost secrecy. Another network of this structure is the CROWN AGENTS. Formed in 1833 as ‘Crown Agents for the Colonies,’ to run the day to day administration of the empire and to serve as private bankers to government officials, colonial authorities, and heads of state. It is also an older version of Brown & Root supplying a vast range of goods throughout the empire. Goods that included arms, drugs, Viruses, especially to Africa to create the genocidal wars we are, and have witnessed. The Crown Agents is the network that links the CrownTemple to the organised crime operations throughout the empire, the Golden Dawn being one of the most powerful occult operations to be used in Britain amongst the crime syndicates to ensure the right crime waves are in full swing as and when required. We can see this in the current agenda with guns. The Golden Dawn also operates within legal organisations, but is the interconnecting network across all secret societies and religion.

Remember the Crown Agents work directly for the Monarch who works for the KnightsTemplarChurch, which operates for the Vatican, and for added insult the Crown Agents entire debt is guaranteed by the British Government, that means you! In the 1970’s it was bailed out by the Bank of England costing hundreds of millions of pounds. For many years the Crown Agents managed the personal wealth of the Sultan of Brunei who just happens to be a great friend of the Queen, and has funded many of Prince Philips, Prince Charles, and father George Bush’s private projects. The Sultan is also the financier of both British and American unofficial intelligence operations as he has backed many of Mohammed Al Fayed’s operations, in fact the Sultan could be said to be Mohammed Al Fayed!

After the murder of Princess Diana the role of Al Fayed was for him to hijack the conspiracy and thus lead investigators down the Al Fayed rap of bullshit as was done with Nick Brown over the top up fees debate, and is currently being played by David Davis. Fortunately no one needed to go to him for information because we all in our hearts already know she was murdered. In 1996 the Crown Agents was privatised with the name Crown Agents for Overseas Government and Administration LTD. Of course privatisation is nothing but transfer of Power from CrownTemple through Government agency to CrownTemple via direct ownership; they own everything in this nation! Just to give an idea of What the Crown Agencies controls here’s a couple of little companies it controls as it acts as a holding company for: Barclays bank Standard and Chartered bank Unilever Tate and Lyle Securicor British Telecom The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum Aga Khan Foundation I think you get the picture; it’s big to say the least.

It manages the customs services of Mozambique, and through a company called Europe SA, is in charge of all economic construction procurement for Bosnia. It is also in joint venture with Monaco based company ES-KO, to provide all the food for United Nations peace keeping forces in Angola and Bosnia. With this you can see the more war the more profit for the Crown Agents, and if it goes tits up no problem the British Taxpayer will foot the bill!!!! The queen of England owns the 40.000 acre Duchy of Lancaster, the 44.000 acre Duchy of Cornwall which gives Charles his income. In truth it is the Crown that owns these assets which are assigned to the ruling monarch, so long as they do as they are told. The Crown it transpires owns land in the UK to the tune of 40 million acres. The Queen owns over 300 residencies around the country, and invests heavily in corporations like Rio Tinto Zinc (RTZ), Royal Dutch Shell, ICI, and General Electric.

This is no surprise in that these companies are 100% Illuminati operations. Rio Tinto is the largest mining company in the world and was established in 1873 by Hugh Matheson of the Global drug running operation Jardine Matheson. Rio Tinto was in at the start of the North Sea Oil, along with Texaco. They used the refineries of BP in which the Queen also has massive investments, so now you know where all the revenues from the North Sea oil reserves went, to the CrownTemple. This shows insider dealing on an individual basis enabling the Queen to make massive profits. Another blatant conflict of interest to have been identified was Rio Tinto’s involvement in a cartel formed in 1971 to fix the price of Uranium.

A Federal grand jury and the 1976 US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Frank Church, exposed the sting. It also included a company called Mary Kathleen Uranium of Australia. This company had been secretly encouraging the Aborigines to occupy Uranium rich lands in Australia to take these lands out of production to raise the price on the world market. The manipulated shortage of Uranium had a serious effect on the American Westinghouse company who sought to take legal action against Rio Tinto for price rigging. This strategy has been used in the USA against the Native Americans and throughout Africa.

An American court ordered that Rio Tinto officials answer questions, but this was quashed by the British Law Lords. The Australian government passed legislation to the same effect. This was after the Australian Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam, had been dismissed from office by the Queens Governor General of Australia, Sir John Kerr. Whitlam was pursuing a policy of buying out the mining and raw material cartels, like Rio Tinto and Anglo American, to stop them raping Australia’s resource base, while giving nothing in return. The Queen having enormous investments in both companies, removed Whitlam by using some of her wide range of prerogative powers, which by the way she has in all commonwealth countries including Britain, which she can instigate when the Crown deem necessary, but of course in the minds of the masses the Queen has no powers today? Well I suppose she doesn’t in that she is a puppet of the CrownTemple and ultimately to the Roman system. Sir John Kerr, a former high level operative of British Intelligence, was made a member of the Privy Council and the Royal Victorian Order for his loyal and most profitable service to the Queens portfolio. He was later murdered however, when the truth about the removal of Gough Whitlam was in danger of coming out, how they look after their own! He was obviously outer circle and a good man and would have exposed the lies of the inner circle. The Crown Cartels continue through a House of Windsor extremely secretive society called the Club of the Isles. It was named after King Edward VII, Queen Victoria’s son, who was the first to carry the title, Prince of the Isles.

The title is held today by Prince Charles. Edward was heavily involved with the Black Nobility barons of the square mile London Financial District and helped them to engineer the Crimean War, the Russia – Japan War, the preparations for the First World War, and the Opium Wars against China. Through the central organisation of the Club of the Isles comes the fantastic web of interlocking directorships which hold apparently ‘independent’ companies in a network of common control and agenda. Part of the web includes: The Bank of England Anglo American Corporation of South Africa Rio Tinto Minorco Minerals and Resources Corp De Beers Consolidated Mines De Beers Centenary AG N.M Rothschilds Bank Barclays Bank Lloyds Bank Lloyds Insurance Market HSBC Bank National Westminster Bank Barings Bank Schroders bank Standard Chartered Bank Hambros Bank S.G Warburg Toronto Dominion Bank Johnson Matthey Kleinwort Benson Group Lazard Brothers Lohnro J.P Morgan and CO Morgan Grenfell Group British Petroleum Shell and Royal Dutch Petroleum Cadbury – Schweppes Bat Industries Assicurazioni Generali SpA (VeniceItaly) Courtaulds General Electric Cazeenove and Co Grand Metropolitan Hanson PLC HSBS (Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank) Imperial and Chemical Industries (ICI) Inchscape PLC Inco LTD ING Group Jardine Matheson Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation & Co (P & O ferries) Pilkington Glass Reuters Holdings Glaxo Wellcome Smithkline Beecham Unilever and UnileverNV Vickers PLC. This is just a few of them. In 1999 Lonrho had 640 subsidiary companies itself;

it has many more now, all these companies and more have staggering amounts of subsidiaries, in studying the subsidiaries of the multinationals you arrive at the fact that everything is controlled by the Crown, all lead back to operatives of the RomanIlluminatiChurch via the KnightsTemplarChurch. A fact worth noting is that just because a company like Pilkington Glass is now perceived to be owned by a none British company, it has only moved from the British economy, not from the control nor economy of the Illuminati who own everything, this type of movement is only a movement within the global conglomerate that is the New World Order and still earning for, and controlled by, the bloodline elite, albeit via a different branch of the elite tree. Just look at some of the TV companies owned and thus controlled by General Electric: NBC network CNBC MSNBC Bravo MUN2 TV Sci-Fi channel Trio WNBC – New York KNBC – Los Angeles WMAQ – Chicago WCAU – Philadelphia KNTV – San Jose – San Francisco KXAS – Dallas – Fort Worth WRAC Washington WTVJ – Miami KNSDF – San Diego WVIT – Hartford WNCN – Raleigh WCMH – Columbus WVTM – Birmingham (USA) WJAR – Providence KVEA / KWHY – Los Angeles WNJU – New York WSCV – Miami KTMD – Houston WSNS – Chicago KXTX – Dallas KVDA – San Antonio KSTS – San Francisco KDRX – Phoenix KNSO – Fresno KMAS – Denver WNEU – Boston / Merrimack KHRR – Tucson WKAQ – Puerto Rico Universal Studios NBC Universal Television Studio NBC Universal Television Distribution.

This is one company controlling a major chunk of the TV dream state given out to the whole of America. Is it any wonder American’s are completely under the control of the American elite? Another important part of the Windsor network which is part of the CrownTemple are, the City Livery Companies. These purport to represent the various groups of merchants like the gun makers, stationers, newspaper makers, goldsmiths and the like. They are in fact very secret societies fundamental to the control of the City institutions and much further afield. In the 1350’s, in the wake of the plague known to history as the black death, government of the City was passed from the ward councils to the City Livery Companies. In 1979 the year Thatcher took power, the Honourable Company of Freemen of the City of London and of North America, began to hold meetings in New York and Toronto and on October 21st 1991 the Association of Liverymen of the City of London in Hong Kong was founded and all their members were Architects (Freemasons).

The late author Peter Jones, researched some of the Livery Companies in the 1990’s for his book,’ the obedience of Australia’, which exposed the manipulation which led to the removal by the Queen, of Australian Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam. These are some of the names he found within these companies: Engineers: The Duke of Edinburgh. Airline Pilots and Navigators: The Duke of Edinburgh Prince Andrew Butchers: Queen Mother, Lord Vesty (of the meat family and Lord Prior of the Order of St John of Jerusalem) Merchant Tailors: Queen Mother, Lord Whitelaw, Lord Hailsham. Glovers: Margaret Thatcher, Sir John Fieldhouse (Admiral of the Fleet during the Falklands conflict) Poulterers: Margaret Thatcher, Duchess of Devonshire. Fishmongers: Duke and Duchess of Devonshire, C.E.A Hambro (Hambros Bank, Taylor Woodrow, and P&O), Lord Inchcape (Her Majesty’s Lieutenant of London) Goldsmiths: J.H Hambro. Grocers: Edward Heath. Salter’s: Duke of Kent (Grand Master of English Freemasonry) Lord Armstrong. Clothworkers: Sir Peter Gadson (a Grand Master of the United Grand Lodge), Lord Carrington (Thatcher’s handler). Another name prominent within these companies is McAlpine of the construction family. You will of course have noted Prince Philip heading the Pilots and Navigators which gives indication as to who is in control of the current attack on our right to travel by plane and the whole swath of legislation about to come out relative to the air traffic using the environment scam to force it through.

Just as a matter of interest, the cheap flight operator Easy Jet is financed by the Warberg Bank which is part of the Rothschilds empire and proven beyond doubt to have funded the rise of Hitler‘s war machine on behalf of the Rothschilds. The fact they are now blaming these cheap flight operators for the rise in carbon emissions shows you why the Warberg bank has funded this airline, it is the catalyst for the introduction of the carbon scam. Basically they will determine how much you as a household can travel. You have to look at this whole carbon emission agenda as an attempt to instill a massive suppressing layer of control upon families and business via the introduction of quotas per household. This will stifle people movement to unimaginable levels. Don’t forget the House of Rothschild operates directly under the current British chief, Prince Philip. Prince Philip’s whole family were supporters of the Nazi’s as was he. In 1935 Prince Christoph, the husband of Philip’s sister Sophie, was a colonel in the SS of Himmler’s personal staff and head of the Forschungsamt, an elite intelligence operation controlled by Hermann Goering.

It was they who carried out the famous Night of the Long Knives when Hitler removed his key opponents. Christoph and Sophie named their eldest child, Karl Adolf, after Hitler, Prince Philip was involved in his education. Christoph’s brother, Philip of Hess, was related to the King of Italy and was the official liaison between the fascists of Italy and Germany. Also at the same time the British King, Edward VIII, who was forced to abdicate in order the Queen Mother could be placed in the position of Chief Toad (remember Diana used to call the Windsor’s ‘toadies’) which meant she had to marry the lesser of the brothers, Bertie, the one she could obviously control. Edward was well known to be a Nazi supporter; Prince Philip kept up very serious connections with Edward even after his abdication in 1936. Another of Edward’s supporters, and mentor to Prince Philip was the known paedophile and Satanist Lord Louis Mountbatten (Battenberg). Mountbatten was Philips route into the House of Windsor. Mountbatten was the grandson of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert and was born at WindsorCastle in 1900.

While Mountbatten was supposedly fighting on the British side during the war he maintained serious communications with his and the Windsor’s German Clan via his sister Louise, the Crown Princess of Sweden and wife of King Gustav. Louise was Prince Philips aunt. At the end of the war, in June 1945 the British King, George VI, the father of Queen Elizabeth and Puppet of the Queen Mother, sent the former MI5 officer, Anthony Blunt, to the Kronberg Castle of Prince Philips sister Sophie, and her Nazi husband Prince Christoph of Hess, to recover correspondence between the British Royal Family and their Nazi relatives, for propaganda aimed at convincing the aristocrats of Britain they had not been in contact all along.

Blunt was the ‘surveyor of the Queens Pictures’ and a world expert in the paintings of Poussin, the initiate who painted pictures called ‘The Shepherds of Arcadia’ which related to the Rennes-le-Chateau mysteries. If you remember Blunt was named as a member of a KGB unit inside British intelligence along with Burgess, MacLean, and Philby, the fifth man of course was never named, but was in fact Lord Victor Rothschild. If you have seen the latest Bond movie Casino Royale, you hear the Character ‘M’ played by Dame Judy Dench state, ‘ in the cold war days intelligence operatives that made a big mistake had the common decency to defect’, of course they would the intelligence services of the world are one and the same. When Blunt was finally caught in the 1980’s, Queen Elizabeth II demanded he was not questioned on his clandestine mission to KronbergCastle… So who controls the law? Another important secret society within the CrownTemple is the Knights Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath, sounds pretty strange until you understand its symbolism. Both George Bush and Ronald Reagan were given this title. The resurrection bath of alchemy symbolises rebirth and purification or absolution.

Baths are given to Masonic Knights of the Bath before they perform horrendous deeds, hence the term ‘Blood Baths. This information in the last few paragraphs still only hints at the true power of the Crown Temple, one also has to include all that the Vatican openly controls to see the true extent of the power of the Roman Illuminati Church to which the Knights Templar Church is subordinate. Through all these networks and more, Thirteen Royal Nefilim families control the world, and it is they who are carrying out all the atrocities in the world at this present time using sad and pathetic creatures, namely fanatics of the human race to carry out the agenda of the Elohim. The Crown also owns massive parts of our coastline around this nation and 12 miles out to sea, in total about half of the coastline. Some of this is under the control of the Ministry of Defence itself controlled by the Crown. The current legislation in which the National Trust will purchase some of this land from the MOD and coast not belonging to the MOD changes nothing.

The National Trust is 100% controlled by the Crown. We have the British Waterways agency, and the railways again controlling massive amounts of land, we are almost back to the middle ages now. One of the greatest means to the Windsor landgrab is the: CLUB OF THE ISLES Controlling the World Wildlife Fund, WWF, this is one hell of a heinous operation and given the fact Prince Philip inherited the position as the Queens fella, as commander of the Club of the Isles…Then he is at the helm of genocide the likes the Holocaust could never imagine. I see the Royals are playing the good guys relative to the Sunni Muslims with the release of the Manchester man after 18 years in prison in Pakistan, this in itself shows you who operates President Musharaff of Pakistan, via such orders as the Order of the Mystic Shrine, ‘Shriners’.

This is important given Pakistan is now under attack from the NATO forces, again controlled by the Inner City banking cartel which includes the Dutch and the Swiss. So how does the Crown control all the MP’s? Answer; via the whip system. All MP’s that you vote in to represent you are told how to vote each day by each party’s leadership via the whips. So when any politician that has ever been and will be while this system exists, tells lies to the whole population the minute he or she opens its mouth and speaks. No matter what it speaks about it is speaking what it has been told to speak, how to speak and when to speak.

If it does not obey the whips there career is over. Thus the Crown need only control the personnel at leadership level or the cabinet of each political party and the Whips office, then through that clique of puppets demand obedience from all MP’s down to the members sat in each constituency claiming to be acting on your behalf. How you have all missed this one is beyond me. So the majority of Mundane Persons, oops sorry MP’s don’t even get to see each bill before it goes to the vote, and indeed they don’t need to as they are told how to vote. On Sunday 11th February 2007 on the political show ‘Sunday AM, Giles Brandreth a conservative party whip stated: “As a whip we understand each MP’s marital problems, their drinking problems their financial problems, we know a lot about them.

We then advise and guide them to making the right decisions.” Do you still feel MP’s operate by their own mind and emotions? Of course they do not. This is the best I have witnessed from a politician handing you on a plate how the game of politics in truth operates. They are all via fear of their personal information being leaked; totally afraid of the whips, and so do the whips bidding, which of course is the Crown’s bidding. All MP’s that speak at the box in the commons do so under oath to the Bible positioned under the box, what does that tell you about those who operate as very religious people (Blair) Blair is a high member of the Illuminati that is why he can lie as he speaks to the house and the people, with ease.

Vatican Owns British Kingdom And American Colonies

May 1, 2017

The government and legal system of the United States is totally controlled by the Crown. I have also stated that the British Monarch is not the Crown. The Crown is the Inner City of London, which is an independent State in London belonging to the Vatican system. It is a banking cartel which has a massive system around and beneath, which hides its true power The City is in fact the Knights Templar Church, also known as the Crown Temple or Crown Templar, and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment. The Temple grounds are also home to the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row.

The Crown Temple controls the Global ‘Legal’ system, including those in the United States, Canada, Australia, and much more; this is because all Bar Associations are franchises of the International Bar Association at the Inns of Court at CrownTemple based at Chancery Lane in London. All Bar Associations are franchises of the Crown and all Bar Attorneys/ Barristers throughout the world pledge a solemn oath to the Temple, even though many may not be aware that this is what they are doing. Bar Association ‘licensed’ Solicitors / Barristers must keep to their Oath, Pledge and terms of allegiance to the CrownTemple if they are to be “called to the Bar” and work in the legal profession. The ruling Monarch is also subordinate to the Crown Temple, this as been so since the reign of King John in the 13th century when Royal Sovereignty was transferred to the Crown Temple and, through this, to the Roman Church. King John 1167-1216 is the key to this deception.

It was at the Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court in January 1215 that King John was faced with the demands of the French/English Barons in England (mainly French), to confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. When he signed the Magna Carta in 1215 history records this as an event that extended human freedom, but the real affect was very different as we shall see. The governments of the USA, Canada, Australia and more are subsidiaries of the Crown Temple and so is the US Central Bank the Federal Reserve, as are all Central Banks on the Planet and including the IMF` World Bank.

Bar Associations are awarded their franchises by the Four Inns of Court at Temple Bar. These are the InnerTemple, MiddleTemple, Lincolns Inn and Greys Inn and they are nothing less than elite secret societies without charters or statutes. They are the law unto themselves. The InnerTemple controls the legal system franchise for Canada and Britain while the MiddleTemple does the same for the United States. Queen Elizabeth II is a member of both Temples. At least five signatories to the American Declaration of Independence were Temple Bar Attorneys who had pledged allegiance to the Crown! Another MiddleTemple operative during the formation of the USA was Alexander Hamilton who structured the American Banking system to fulfil the Crown Temples agenda for total control of the United States. So in truth a State wherever it is on this planet, is a legal entity of the TempleCrown, or a Crown Colony. A man named Michael Edwards wrote:

“Americans were fooled into believing that the legal Crown Colonies comprising New England were independent nation states, but they never were nor are today. They were and still are |Colonies of the CrownTemple, through letters patent and charters, who have no legal authority to be independent from the rule and order of the CrownTemple. A legal state is a CrownTemple Colony.”
“Neither the American people nor the Queen of Britain own America. The CrownTemple owns America through the deception of those who have sworn their allegiance by oath to the Middle Temple Bar. The Crown Bankers and their Middle Templar Attorneys rule America through unlawful contracts, unlawful Taxes, and contract documents of false equity through debt deceit, all strictly enforced by their completely unlawful, but’ legal’, orders, rules and codes of the Crown Temple Courts, or so called ‘Judiciary’ in America. This is because the CrownTemple holds the land titles and estate deeds to all of North America.”

Seven Middle Inn Templars who had pledged an oath of allegiance to the CrownTemple (including Alexander Hamilton) were among the members of the Constitutional Convention who signed the completed ‘American Constitution’. How symbolic it is that copies of the American Constitution and the Declaration of Independence hang on the wall of the MiddleTemple in London. It’s not that surprising when you consider this Temple controlled both sides in these shenanigans.
So while the Middle Bar Templars were orchestrating the illusion of freedom from the perceived rule by King George III, the King too, was a sworn member of the same Temple. Michael Edwards continues:

“1776 is the year that will truly live in infamy for all Americans. It is the year that the Crown Colonies became legal Crown States. The Declaration of Independence was a legal, not lawful, document. It was signed on both sides by representatives of the CrownTemple. Legally, it announced the status quo of the Crown Colonies to that of the new legal name called ‘States’ as direct possessive estates of the Crown.

“The American people were hoodwinked into thinking they were declaring lawful independence from the Crown. Proof that the colonies are still in Crown possession is the use of the word ‘State’ to signify a ‘legal estate of possession.’ Had this been a document of and by the people, both the Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution would have been written using the word ‘States’. By the use of ‘State’, the significance of government of estate possessions was legally established. All of the North American States are Crown Templar possessions through their legal document, signed by their representation of both parties to the contract, known as the Constitution of the United States of America.

Who controls the Crown?

On May 15th 1213, King John, puppet of the Knights Templar, effectively signed away the Kingdom of England and Ireland to Pope Innocent III and the Roman Church, witnessed by the Crown Templars. As King John said at the time:
“I myself bearing witness in the house of the Knights Templars.”
The King John Charter said:

“ We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal… not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and by common councel of our Barons, do offer and freely concede to God and his Holy Apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman Church, and to our lord Pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom of Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances… we perform and swear fealty for them to him are aforesaid lord pope Innocent, and his Catholic successors and the Roman Church… binding our successors and our heirs by our wife forever, in a similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at the time, and to the Roman church without demur. As a sign… we will and establish perpetual obligation and concession… from the proper and especial revenues of our aforesaid kingdoms… the Roman church shall receive yearly a thousand marks sterling… saving to us and to our heirs our rights, liberties and regalia; all of which things, as they have been described above, we wish to have perpetually valid and firm; and we bind ourselves and our successors not to act counter to them. And if we or any of our successors shall presume to attempt this, whoever he be, unless being duly warned he come to his kingdom, and his senses, he shall lose his right to the kingdom, and this charter of our obligation and concession shall always remain firm.”

Now it gets interesting. Historical accounts concentrate the fact that this charter obliged the Crown to pay money to the Roman Church, but it also states that if the terms of the charter are broken, the ‘right to the kingdom’ shall be lost. When King John signed the Magna Carter on June 15th 1215 he broke the terms of the charter with the Pope and therefore lost the right to his Kingdom. Pope Innocent III then declared the Magna Carter null and void. From this time the ‘Crown’ passed from the Monarch to the Knights Templar who to this day, governs Britain on behalf of the Roman IlluminatiChurch. The St Clair’s now Sinclair are the initial directors of this link of Templar and Rome in the British Isles as they took hold in Scotland at the time of the 1066 Norsemen-Norman invasion. This means, if we take it a stage further, that ultimately, through the CrownTemple, the Roman system also owns the United States, Canada and all countries and Bar associations controlled both overtly and covertly by the Crown. This is why the Peace Treaty between the American Colonies and the British Crown in 1783, stated:

“It having pleased the Divine Providence to dispose the hearts of the most serene and most potent Prince George the third, by the grace of God, King of Great Britain, France and Ireland, defender of the faith, Duke of Brunswick and Lunebourg, arch treasurer and prince elector of the Holy Roman Empire etc… and of the United States of America…”

And for the Irony, a Roman Catholic is barred from being the British Monarch while all along the Monarch and the Kingdom have been owned by the system that is Rome.

The Queen is the Grand Patroness of Freemasonry. She is served by the 390 members of the Privy Council which connects with its equivalent in all other Commonwealth Countries. The Privy Council is ‘LEGALLY’ above Parliament because of its prerogative powers. Its members, who are appointed for life, include Prince Philip, Prince Charles, the Archbishop of Canterbury, the Prime Minister and many others. They hold nine official meetings each year and the government (Crown) minister’s stand to attention while the Queen is told of the government measures they are asking the Queen to approve, which are nothing other than what the Crown dictates via the elected leader and via the Whips of whichever political party has power… After taking their bow to the Queen and shaking her hand they are sworn to conduct their business in the utmost secrecy.

Another network of this structure is the CROWN AGENTS. Formed in 1833 as ‘Crown Agents for the Colonies,’ to run the day to day administration of the empire and to serve as private bankers to government officials, colonial authorities, and heads of state. It is also an older version of Brown & Root supplying a vast range of goods throughout the empire. Goods that included arms, drugs, Viruses, especially to Africa to create the genocidal wars we are, and have witnessed. The Crown Agents is the network that links the CrownTemple to the organised crime operations throughout the empire, the Golden Dawn being one of the most powerful occult operations to be used in Britain amongst the crime syndicates to ensure the right crime waves are in full swing as and when required. We can see this in the current agenda with guns. The Golden Dawn also operates within legal organisations, but is the interconnecting network across all secret societies and religion. Remember the Crown Agents work directly for the Monarch who works for the KnightsTemplarChurch, which operates for the Vatican, and for added insult the Crown Agents entire debt is guaranteed by the British Government, that means you! In the 1970’s it was bailed out by the Bank of England costing hundreds of millions of pounds. For many years the Crown Agents managed the personal wealth of the Sultan of Brunei who just happens to be a great friend of the Queen, and has funded many of Prince Philips, Prince Charles, and father George Bush’s private projects. The Sultan is also the financier of both British and American unofficial intelligence operations as he has backed many of Mohammed Al Fayed’s operations, in fact the Sultan could be said to be Mohammed Al Fayed! After the murder of Princess Diana the role of Al Fayed was for him to hijack the conspiracy and thus lead investigators down the Al Fayed rap of bullshit as was done with Nick Brown over the top up fees debate, and is currently being played by David Davis. Fortunately no one needed to go to him for information because we all in our hearts already know she was murdered.
In 1996 the Crown Agents was privatised with the name Crown Agents for Overseas Government and Administration LTD. Of course privatisation is nothing but transfer of Power from CrownTemple through Government agency to CrownTemple via direct ownership; they own everything in this nation!

Just to give an idea of What the Crown Agencies controls here’s a couple of little companies it controls as it acts as a holding company for:

Barclays bank
Standard and Chartered bank
Unilever
Tate and Lyle
Securicor
British Telecom
The Prince of Wales Business Leaders Forum
Aga Khan Foundation

I think you get the picture; it’s big to say the least.

It manages the customs services of Mozambique, and through a company called Europe SA, is in charge of all economic construction procurement for Bosnia. It is also in joint venture with Monaco based company ES-KO, to provide all the food for United Nations peace keeping forces in Angola and Bosnia. With this you can see the more war the more profit for the Crown Agents, and if it goes tits up no problem the British Taxpayer will foot the bill!!!!

The queen of England owns the 40.000 acre Duchy of Lancaster, the 44.000 acre Duchy of Cornwall which gives Charles his income. In truth it is the Crown that owns these assets which are assigned to the ruling monarch, so long as they do as they are told. The Crown it transpires owns land in the UK to the tune of 40 million acres. The Queen owns over 300 residencies around the country, and invests heavily in corporations like Rio Tinto Zinc (RTZ), Royal Dutch Shell, ICI, and General Electric. This is no surprise in that these companies are 100% Illuminati operations. Rio Tinto is the largest mining company in the world and was established in 1873 by Hugh Matheson of the Global drug running operation Jardine Matheson. Rio Tinto was in at the start of the North Sea Oil, along with Texaco. They used the refineries of BP in which the Queen also has massive investments, so now you know where all the revenues from the North Sea oil reserves went, to the CrownTemple. This shows insider dealing on an individual basis enabling the Queen to make massive profits. Another blatant conflict of interest to have been identified was Rio Tinto’s involvement in a cartel formed in 1971 to fix the price of Uranium. A Federal grand jury and the 1976 US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, chaired by Frank Church, exposed the sting. It also included a company called Mary Kathleen Uranium of Australia. This company had been secretly encouraging the Aborigines to occupy Uranium rich lands in Australia to take these lands out of production to raise the price on the world market. The manipulated shortage of Uranium had a serious effect on the American Westinghouse company who sought to take legal action against Rio Tinto for price rigging. This strategy has been used in the USA against the Native Americans and throughout Africa. An American court ordered that Rio Tinto officials answer questions, but this was quashed by the British Law Lords. The Australian government passed legislation to the same effect. This was after the Australian Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam, had been dismissed from office by the Queens Governor General of Australia, Sir John Kerr. Whitlam was pursuing a policy of buying out the mining and raw material cartels, like Rio Tinto and Anglo American, to stop them raping Australia’s resource base, while giving nothing in return. The Queen having enormous investments in both companies, removed Whitlam by using some of her wide range of prerogative powers, which by the way she has in all commonwealth countries including Britain, which she can instigate when the Crown deem necessary, but of course in the minds of the masses the Queen has no powers today? Well I suppose she doesn’t in that she is a puppet of the CrownTemple and ultimately to the Roman system. Sir John Kerr, a former high level operative of British Intelligence, was made a member of the Privy Council and the Royal Victorian Order for his loyal and most profitable service to the Queens portfolio. He was later murdered however, when the truth about the removal of Gough Whitlam was in danger of coming out, how they look after their own! He was obviously outer circle and a good man and would have exposed the lies of the inner circle. The Crown Cartels continue through a House of Windsor extremely secretive society called the Club of the Isles. It was named after King Edward VII, Queen Victoria’s son, who was the first to carry the title, Prince of the Isles. The title is held today by Prince Charles. Edward was heavily involved with the Black Nobility barons of the square mile London Financial District and helped them to engineer the Crimean War, the Russia – Japan War, the preparations for the First World War, and the Opium Wars against China. Through the central organisation of the Club of the Isles comes the fantastic web of interlocking directorships which hold apparently ‘independent’ companies in a network of common control and agenda. Part of the web includes:

The Bank of England
Anglo American Corporation of South Africa
Rio Tinto
Minorco Minerals and Resources Corp
De Beers Consolidated Mines
De Beers Centenary AG
N.M Rothschilds Bank
Barclays Bank
Lloyds Bank
Lloyds Insurance Market
HSBC Bank
National Westminster Bank
Barings Bank
Schroders bank
Standard Chartered Bank
Hambros Bank
S.G Warburg
Toronto Dominion Bank
Johnson Matthey
Kleinwort Benson Group
Lazard Brothers
Lohnro
J.P Morgan and CO
Morgan Grenfell Group
British Petroleum
Shell and Royal Dutch Petroleum
Cadbury – Schweppes
Bat Industries
Assicurazioni Generali SpA (VeniceItaly)
Courtaulds
General Electric
Cazeenove and Co
Grand Metropolitan
Hanson PLC
HSBS (Hong Kong and Shanghai Bank)
Imperial and Chemical Industries (ICI)
Inchscape PLC
Inco LTD
ING Group
Jardine Matheson
Peninsular and Oriental Steam Navigation & Co (P & O ferries)
Pilkington Glass
Reuters Holdings
Glaxo Wellcome
Smithkline Beecham
Unilever and UnileverNV
Vickers PLC.

This is just a few of them. In 1999 Lonrho had 640 subsidiary companies itself; it has many more now, all these companies and more have staggering amounts of subsidiaries, in studying the subsidiaries of the multinationals you arrive at the fact that everything is controlled by the Crown, all lead back to operatives of the RomanIlluminatiChurch via the KnightsTemplarChurch. A fact worth noting is that just because a company like Pilkington Glass is now perceived to be owned by a none British company, it has only moved from the British economy, not from the control nor economy of the Illuminati who own everything, this type of movement is only a movement within the global conglomerate that is the New World Order and still earning for, and controlled by, the bloodline elite, albeit via a different branch of the elite tree.

Just look at some of the TV companies owned and thus controlled by General Electric:

NBC network
CNBC
MSNBC
Bravo
MUN2 TV
Sci-Fi channel
Trio
WNBC – New York
KNBC – Los Angeles
WMAQ – Chicago
WCAU – Philadelphia
KNTV – San Jose – San Francisco
KXAS – Dallas – Fort Worth
WRAC Washington
WTVJ – Miami
KNSDF – San Diego
WVIT – Hartford
WNCN – Raleigh
WCMH – Columbus
WVTM – Birmingham (USA)
WJAR – Providence
KVEA / KWHY – Los Angeles
WNJU – New York
WSCV – Miami
KTMD – Houston
WSNS – Chicago
KXTX – Dallas
KVDA – San Antonio
KSTS – San Francisco
KDRX – Phoenix
KNSO – Fresno
KMAS – Denver
WNEU – Boston / Merrimack
KHRR – Tucson
WKAQ – Puerto Rico
Universal Studios
NBC Universal Television Studio
NBC Universal Television Distribution.

This is one company controlling a major chunk of the TV dream state given out to the whole of America. Is it any wonder American’s are completely under the control of the American elite?

Another important part of the Windsor network which is part of the CrownTemple are, the City Livery Companies. These purport to represent the various groups of merchants like the gun makers, stationers, newspaper makers, goldsmiths and the like. They are in fact very secret societies fundamental to the control of the City institutions and much further afield. In the 1350’s, in the wake of the plague known to history as the black death, government of the City was passed from the ward councils to the City Livery Companies. In 1979 the year Thatcher took power, the Honourable Company of Freemen of the City of London and of North America, began to hold meetings in New York and Toronto and on October 21st 1991 the Association of Liverymen of the City of London in Hong Kong was founded and all their members were Architects (Freemasons). The late author Peter Jones, researched some of the Livery Companies in the 1990’s for his book,’ the obedience of Australia’, which exposed the manipulation which led to the removal by the Queen, of Australian Prime Minister, Gough Whitlam. These are some of the names he found within these companies:

Engineers: The Duke of Edinburgh.

Airline Pilots and Navigators: The Duke of Edinburgh Prince Andrew

Butchers: Queen Mother, Lord Vesty (of the
meat family and Lord Prior of the Order
of St John of Jerusalem)

Merchant Tailors: Queen Mother, Lord Whitelaw, Lord
Hailsham.

Glovers: Margaret Thatcher, Sir John Fieldhouse
(Admiral of the Fleet during the
Falklands conflict)

Poulterers: Margaret Thatcher, Duchess of
Devonshire.
Fishmongers: Duke and Duchess of Devonshire, C.E.A
Hambro (Hambros Bank, Taylor Woodrow,
and P&O), Lord Inchcape (Her Majesty’s
Lieutenant of London)

Goldsmiths: J.H Hambro.
Grocers: Edward Heath.
Salter’s: Duke of Kent (Grand Master of English
Freemasonry) Lord Armstrong.

Clothworkers: Sir Peter Gadson (a Grand Master of the
United Grand Lodge), Lord Carrington
(Thatcher’s handler).

Another name prominent within these companies is McAlpine of the construction family.
You will of course have noted Prince Philip heading the Pilots and Navigators which gives indication as to who is in control of the current attack on our right to travel by plane and the whole swath of legislation about to come out relative to the air traffic using the environment scam to force it through. Just as a matter of interest, the cheap flight operator Easy Jet is financed by the Warberg Bank which is part of the Rothschilds empire and proven beyond doubt to have funded the rise of Hitler‘s war machine on behalf of the Rothschilds. The fact they are now blaming these cheap flight operators for the rise in carbon emissions shows you why the Warberg bank has funded this airline, it is the catalyst for the introduction of the carbon scam. Basically they will determine how much you as a household can travel. You have to look at this whole carbon emission agenda as an attempt to instil a massive suppressing layer of control upon families and business via the introduction of quotas per household. This will stifle people movement to unimaginable levels. Don’t forget the House of Rothschild operates directly under the current British chief, Prince Philip. Prince Philip’s whole family were supporters of the Nazi’s as was he. In 1935 Prince Christoph, the husband of Philip’s sister Sophie, was a colonel in the SS of Himmler’s personal staff and head of the Forschungsamt, an elite intelligence operation controlled by Hermann Goering. It was they who carried out the famous Night of the Long Knives when Hitler removed his key opponents. Christoph and Sophie named their eldest child, Karl Adolf, after Hitler, Prince Philip was involved in his education. Christoph’s brother, Philip of Hess, was related to the King of Italy and was the official liaison between the fascists of Italy and Germany. Also at the same time the British King, Edward VIII, who was forced to abdicate in order the Queen Mother could be placed in the position of Chief Toad (remember Diana used to call the Windsor’s ‘toadies’) which meant she had to marry the lesser of the brothers, Bertie, the one she could obviously control. Edward was well known to be a Nazi supporter; Prince Philip kept up very serious connections with Edward even after his abdication in 1936. Another of Edward’s supporters, and mentor to Prince Philip was the known paedophile and Satanist Lord Louis Mountbatten (Battenberg). Mountbatten was Philips route into the House of Windsor. Mountbatten was the grandson of Queen Victoria and Prince Albert and was born at WindsorCastle in 1900. while Mountbatten was supposedly fighting on the British side during the war he maintained serious communications with his and the Windsor’s German Clan via his sister Louise, the Crown Princess of Sweden and wife of King Gustav. Louise was Prince Philips aunt. At the end of the war, in June 1945 the British King, George VI, the father of Queen Elizabeth and Puppet of the Queen Mother, sent the former MI5 officer, Anthony Blunt, to the Kronberg Castle of Prince Philips sister Sophie, and her Nazi husband Prince Christoph of Hess, to recover correspondence between the British Royal Family and their Nazi relatives, for propaganda aimed at convincing the aristocrats of Britain they had not been in contact all along. Blunt was the ‘surveyor of the Queens Pictures’ and a world expert in the paintings of Poussin, the initiate who painted pictures called ‘The Shepherds of Arcadia’ which related to the Rennes-le-Chateau mysteries. If you remember Blunt was named as a member of a KGB unit inside British intelligence along with Burgess, MacLean, and Philby, the fifth man of course was never named, but was in fact Lord Victor Rothschild. If you have seen the latest Bond movie Casino Royale, you hear the Character ‘M’ played by Dame Judy Dench state, ‘ in the cold war days intelligence operatives that made a big mistake had the common decency to defect’, of course they would the intelligence services of the world are one and the same. When Blunt was finally caught in the 1980’s, Queen Elizabeth II demanded he was not questioned on his clandestine mission to KronbergCastle… So who controls the law?

Another important secret society within the CrownTemple is the Knights Grand Cross of the Order of the Bath, sounds pretty strange until you understand its symbolism. Both George Bush and Ronald Reagan were given this title. The resurrection bath of alchemy symbolises rebirth and purification or absolution. Baths are given to Masonic Knights of the Bath before they perform horrendous deeds, hence the term ‘Blood Baths.

This information in the last few paragraphs still only hints at the true power of the Crown Temple, one also has to include all that the Vatican openly controls to see the true extent of the power of the Roman Illuminati Church to which the Knights Templar Church is subordinate. Through all these networks and more, Thirteen Royal Nefilim families control the world, and it is they who are carrying out all the atrocities in the world at this present time using sad and pathetic creatures, namely fanatics of the human race to carry out the agenda of the Elohim.

The Crown also owns massive parts of our coastline around this nation and 12 miles out to sea, in total about half of the coastline. Some of this is under the control of the Ministry of Defence itself controlled by the Crown. The current legislation in which the National Trust will purchase some of this land from the MOD and coast not belonging to the MOD changes nothing. The National Trust is 100% controlled by the Crown. We have the British Waterways agency, and the railways again controlling massive amounts of land, we are almost back to the middle ages now.

One of the greatest means to the Windsor landgrab is the:
CLUB OF THE ISLES

Controlling the World Wildlife Fund, WWF, this is one hell of a heinous operation and given the fact Prince Philip inherited the position as the Queens fella, as commander of the Club of the Isles…Then he is at the helm of genocide the likes the Holocaust could never imagine.

I see the Royals are playing the good guys relative to the Sunni Muslims with the release of the Manchester man after 18 years in prison in Pakistan, this in itself shows you who operates President Musharaff of Pakistan, via such orders as the Order of the Mystic Shrine, ‘Shriners’.

This is important given Pakistan is now under attack from the NATO forces, again controlled by the Inner City banking cartel which includes the Dutch and the Swiss.

So how does the Crown control all the MP’s? Answer; via the whip system. All MP’s that you vote in to represent you are told how to vote each day by each party’s leadership via the whips. So when any politician that has ever been and will be while this system exists, tells lies to the whole population the minute he or she opens its mouth and speaks. No matter what it speaks about it is speaking what it has been told to speak, how to speak and when to speak. If it does not obey the whips there career is over. Thus the Crown need only control the personnel at leadership level or the cabinet of each political party and the Whips office, then through that clique of puppets demand obedience from all MP’s down to the members sat in each constituency claiming to be acting on your behalf. How you have all missed this one is beyond me.
So the majority of Mundane Persons, oops sorry MP’s don’t even get to see each bill before it goes to the vote, and indeed they don’t need to as they are told how to vote.

On Sunday 11th February 2007 on the political show ‘Sunday AM, Giles Brandreth a conservative party whip stated:

“As a whip we understand each MP’s marital problems, their drinking problems their financial problems, we know a lot about them. We then advise and guide them to making the right decisions.”

Do you still feel MP’s operate by their own mind and emotions? Of course they do not. This is the best I have witnessed from a politician handing you on a plate how the game of politics in truth operates. They are all via fear of their personal information being leaked; totally afraid of the whips, and so do the whips bidding, which of course is the Crown’s bidding. All MP’s that speak at the box in the commons do so under oath to the Bible positioned under the box, what does that tell you about those who operate as very religious people (Blair) Blair is a high member of the Illuminati that is why he can lie as he speaks to the house and the people, with ease.

The Crown Temple
By Rule of Mystery Babylon

The Templars of the Crown

First, a little historical background. The Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar in two parts: the Round and the Chancel. The Round Church was consecrated in 1185 and modelled after the circular Church of the Holy Sepulchre in Jerusalem. The Chancel was built in 1240. The Temple Church serves both the Inner and Middle Temples (see below) and is located between Fleet Street and Victoria Embankment at the Thames River. Its grounds also house the Crown Offices at Crown Office Row. This Temple “Church” is outside any canonical jurisdiction. The Master of the Temple is appointed and takes his place by sealed (non-public) patent, without induction or institution.
All licensed Bar Attorneys – Attorners (see definitions below) – in the U.S. owe their allegiance and give their solemn oath in pledge to the Crown Temple, realizing this or not.  This is simply due to the fact that all Bar Associations throughout the world are signatories and franchises to the international Bar Association located at the Inns of Court at Crown Temple, which are physically located at Chancery Lane behind Fleet Street in London. Although they vehemently deny it, all Bar Associations in the U.S., such as the American Bar Association, the Florida Bar, or California Bar Association, are franchises to the Crown.
The Inns of Court (see below, The Four Inns of Court) to the Crown Temple use the Banking and Judicial system of the City of London – a sovereign and independent territory which is not a part of Great Britain (just as Washington City, as DC was called in the 1800s, is not a part of the north American states, nor is it a state) to defraud, coerce, and manipulate the American people. These Fleet Street bankers and lawyers are committing crimes in America under the guise and color of law (see definitions for legal and lawful below). They are known collectively as the “Crown.” Their lawyers are actually Templar Bar Attorneys, not lawyers.
The present Queen of England is not the “Crown,” as we have all been led to believe. Rather, it is the Bankers and Attorneys (Attorneys) who are the actual Crown or Crown Temple. The Monarch aristocrats of England have not been ruling sovereigns since the reign of King John, circa 1215. All royal sovereignty of the old British Crown since that time has passed to the Crown Temple in Chancery.
The U.S.A. is not the free and sovereign nation that our federal government tells us it is. If this were true, we would not be dictated to by the Crown Temple through its bankers and attorneys. The U.S.A. is controlled and manipulated by this private foreign power and our unlawful Federal U.S. Government is their pawnbroker. The bankers and Bar Attorneys in the U.S.A. are a franchise in oath and allegiance to the Crown at Chancery – the Crown Temple Church and its Chancel located at Chancery Lane – a manipulative body of elite bankers and attorneys from the independent City of London who violate the law in America by imposing fraudulent “legal” – but totally unlawful – contracts on the American people. The banks Rule the Temple Church and the Attorneys carry out their Orders by controlling their victim’s judiciary.

Since the first Chancel of the Temple Church was built by the Knights Templar, this is not a new ruling system by any means. The Chancel, or Chancery, of the Crown Inner Temple Court was where King John was, in January 1215, when the English barons demanded that he confirm the rights enshrined in the Magna Carta. This City of London Temple was the headquarters of the Templar Knights in Great Britain where Order and Rule were first made, which became known as Code. Remember all these terms, such as Crown, Temple, Templar, Knight, Chancel, Chancery, Court, Code, Order and Rule as we tie together their origins with the present American Temple Bar system of thievery by equity (chancery) contracts.

“Woe unto you, scribes and Pharisees, hypocrites! for ye are like unto whited sepulchres, which indeed appear beautiful outward, but are within full of dead men’s bones, and of all uncleanness.” – Matthew 23:27
By what authority has the “Crown” usurped the natural sovereignty of the American people? Is it acceptable that the U.S. Supreme Court decides constitutional issues in the U.S.A? How can it be considered in any manner as being “constitutional” when this same Supreme Court is appointed by (not elected) and paid by the Federal U.S. Government? As you will soon see, the land called North America belongs to the Crown Temple.

The legal system (judiciary) of the U.S.A. is controlled by the Crown Temple from the independent and sovereign City of London. The private Federal Reserve System, which issues fiat U.S. Federal Reserve Notes, is financially owned and controlled by the Crown from Switzerland, the home and legal origin for the charters of the United Nations, the International Monetary Fund, the World Trade Organisation, and most importantly, the Bank of International Settlements. Even Hitler respected his Crown bankers by not bombing Switzerland. The Bank of International Settlements in Basel, Switzerland controls all the central banks of the G7 nations. He who controls the gold rules the world.

Definitions you never knew:
ATTORN [e-‘tern] Anglo-French a torner to transfer (allegiance of a tenant to another lord), from Old French a torner to turn (to), arrange, from a- to + torner to turn: to agree to be the tenant of a new landlord or owner of the same property. Merriam-Webster’s Dictionary of Law ©1996.
ATTORN, v.i. [L. ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassals or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate.-Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
ESQUIRE, n [L. scutum, a shield; Gr. a hide, of which shields were anciently made.], a shield-bearer or armor-bearer, scutifer; an attendant on a knight. Hence in modern times, a title of dignity next in degree below a knight. In England, this title is given to the younger sons of noblemen, to officers of the king’s courts and of the household, to counsellors at law, justices of the peace, while in commission, sheriffs, and other gentlemen. In the United States, the title is given to public officers of all degrees, from governors down to justices and attorneys.-Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
RULE, n. [L. regula, from regere, to govern, that is, to stretch, strain or make straight.] 1. Government; sway; empire; control; supreme command or authority. 6. In monasteries, corporations or societies, a law or regulation to be observed by the society and its particular members. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary
RULE n. 1 [C] a statement about what must or should be done, (syn.) a regulation.
REGULATION n. 1 [C] a rule, statement about what can be done and what cannot. 2 [U] the general condition of controlling any part of human life. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.
CODE n. 1 [C;U] a way of hiding the true meaning of communications from all except those people who have the keys to understand it. 2 [C] a written set of rules of behaviour. 3 [C] a formal group of principles or laws. -v. coded, coding, codes to put into code, (syn.) to encode.ENCODE v. 1 to change written material into secret symbols. -Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.
CURTAIN n. [OE. cortin, curtin, fr. OF. cortine, curtine, F. courtine, LL. cortina, also, small court, small inclosure surrounded by walls, from cortis court. See Court.] 4 A flag; an ensign; — in contempt. [Obs.] Shak. Behind the curtain, in concealment; in secret. -1913 Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary.
COURT, n. 3. A palace; the place of residence of a king or sovereign prince. 5. Persons who compose the retinue or council of a king or emperor. 9. The tabernacle had one court; the temple, three. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
COURT n. 2 the place where a king or queen lives or meets others. -The Newbury House Dictionary ©1999.
TEMPLAR, n. [from the Temple, a house near the Thames, which originally belonged to the knights Templars. The latter took their denomination from an apartment of the palace of Baldwin II in Jerusalem, near the temple.] 1. A student of the law. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
TEMPLE, n. [L. templum.] 1. A public edifice erected in honor of some deity. Among pagans, a building erected to some pretended deity, and in which the people assembled to worship. Originally, temples were open places, as the Stonehenge in England. 4. In England, the Temples are two inns of court, thus called because anciently the dwellings of  the knights Templars. They are called the Inner and the Middle Temple. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.
CAPITOL, n. 1. The temple of Jupiter in Rome, and a fort or castle, on the Mons Capitolinus. In this, the Senate of Rome anciently assembled; and on the same place, is still the city hall or town-house, where the conservators of the Romans hold their meetings. The same name was given to the principal temples of the Romans in their colonies.
INN, n. [Hebrew, To dwell or to pitch a tent.] 2. In England, a college of municipal or common law professors and students; formerly, the town-house of a nobleman, bishop or other distinguished personage, in which he resided when he attended the court. Inns of court, colleges in which students of law reside and are instructed. The principal are the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln’s Inn, and Gray’s Inn. Inns of chancery, colleges in which young students formerly began their law studies. These are now occupied chiefly by attorneys, solicitors, etc.

INNER, a. [from in.] Interior; farther inward than something else, as an inner chamber; the inner court of a temple or palace. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

CROWN, n. 4. Imperial or regal power or dominion; sovereignty. There is a power behind the crown greater than the crown itself. Junius. 19. A coin stamped with the image of a crown; hence, a denomination of money; as, the English crown. — Crown land, land belonging to the crown, that is, to the sovereign. — Crown law, the law which governs criminal prosecutions. — Crown lawyer, one employed by the crown, as in criminal cases. v.t. 1. To cover, decorate, or invest with a crown; hence, to invest with royal dignity and power. -1913 Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary.

COLONY, n. 1. A company [i.e. legal corporation] or body of people transplanted from their mother country to a remote province or country to cultivate and inhabit it, and remaining subject to the jurisdiction of the parent state; as the British colonies in America or the Indies; the Spanish colonies in South America. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

STATE, n. [L., to stand, to be fixed.] 1. Condition; the circumstances of a being or thing at any given time. These circumstances may be internal, constitutional or peculiar to the being, or they may have relation to other beings. 4. Estate; possession. [See Estate.] -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

ESTATE, n. [L. status, from sto, to stand. The roots stb, std and stg, have nearly the same signification, to set, to fix. It is probable that the L. sto is contracted from stad, as it forms steti.] 1. In a general sense, fixedness; a fixed condition; 5. Fortune; possessions; property in general. 6. The general business or interest of government; hence, a political body; a commonwealth; a republic. But in this sense, we now use State.

ESTATE, v.t. To settle as a fortune. 1. To establish. -Webster’s 1828 Dictionary.

PATENT, a. [L. patens, from pateo, to open.] 3. Appropriated by letters patent. 4. Apparent; conspicuous. PATENT, n. A writing given by the proper authority and duly authenticated, granting a privilege to some person or persons. By patent, or letters patent, that is, open letters, the king of Great Britain grants lands, honors and franchises.

PATENT, v.t. To grant by patent. 1. To secure the exclusive right of a thing to a person

LAWFUL. In accordance with the law of the land; according to the law; permitted, sanctioned, or justified by law. “Lawful” properly implies a thing conformable to or enjoined by law; “Legal”, a thing in the form or after the manner of law or binding by law. A writ or warrant issuing from any court, under color of law, is a “legal” process however defective. – A Dictionary of Law 1893.

LEGAL. Latin legalis. Pertaining to the understanding, the exposition, the administration, the science and the practice of law: as, the legal profession, legal advice; legal blanks, newspaper. Implied or imputed in law. Opposed to actual. “Legal” looks more to the letter, and “Lawful” to the spirit, of the law. “Legal” is more appropriate for conformity to positive rules of law; “Lawful” for accord with ethical principle. “Legal” imports rather that the forms of law are observed, that the proceeding is correct in method, that rules prescribed have been obeyed; “Lawful” that the right is actful in substance, that moral quality is secured. “Legal” is the antithesis of “equitable”, and the equivalent of “constructive”. – 2 Abbott’s Law Dict. 24; A Dictionary of Law (1893).

STATUS IN QUO, STATUS QUO. [L., state in which.] The state in which anything is already. The phrase is also used retrospectively, as when, on a treaty of place, matters return to the status quo ante bellum, or are left in statu quo ante bellum, i.e., the state (or, in the state) before the war.
-1913 Webster’s Revised Unabridged Dictionary

The Four Inns of Court to the unholy Temple

Globally, all the legalistic scams promoted by the exclusive monopoly of the Temple Bar and their Bar Association franchises come from four Inns or Temples of Court: the Inner Temple, the Middle Temple, Lincoln’s Inn, and Gray’s Inn. These Inns/Temples are exclusive and private country clubs; secret societies of world power in commerce. They are well established, some having been founded in the early 1200’s. The Queen and Queen Mother of England are current members of both the Inner Temple and Middle Temple. Gray’s Inn specialises in Taxation legalities by Rule and Code for the Crown. Lincoln’s Inn received its name from the Third Earl of Lincoln (circa 1300).

Just like all U.S. based franchise Bar Associations, none of the Four Inns of the Temple are incorporated – for a definite and purposeful reason: You can’t make claim against a non-entity and a non-being. They are private sociby license to steal from Canada and Great Britain, it is the Middle Temple that has legal license to steal from America. This comes about directly via their Bar Association franchises to the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple through the Crown Temple.

From THE HISTORY OF THE INN, Later Centuries, [p.6], written by the Honourable Society of the Middle Temple, we can see a direct tie to the Bar Association franchises and its Crown signatories in America:

“Call to the Bar or keeping terms in one of the four Inns a pre-requisite to Call at King’s Inns until late in the 19th century. In the 17th and 18th centuries, students came from the American colonies and from many of the West Indian islands. The Inn’s records would lead one to suppose that for a time there was hardly a young gentleman in Charleston who had not studied here. Five of the signatories to the Declaration of Independence were Middle Templars, and notwithstanding it and its consequences, Americans continued to come here until the War of 1812”.

All Bar Association licensed Attorneys must keep the terms of their oath to the Crown Temple in order to be accepted or “called to Bar” at any of the King’s Inns. Their oath, pledge, and terms of allegiance are made to the Crown Temple.

The Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergys programme of eugenics ‘appears’ unstoppable –

December 7, 2016

The Self-Ennobling Ones and their self-validating clergys programme of eugenics ‘appears’ unstoppable –

Pope Francis Encourages Scientists To Work On Sustainable Development
http://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2016/11/29/pope-francis-encourages-scientists-work-sustainable-developmen/

With Pope’s Help, U.N. Bypasses Congress On Global Socialism
http://www.technocracy.news/index.php/2015/09/24/with-popes-help-u-n-bypasses-congress-on-global-socialism/

~

Scott and Shackleton logbooks prove Antarctic sea ice is not shrinking 100 years after expeditions
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=143126

Source:

Scott and Shackleton logbooks prove Antarctic sea ice is not shrinking 100 years after expeditions
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/2016/11/24/scott-shackleton-logbooks-prove-antarctic-sea-ice-not-shrinking/

~

The money behind the transgender movement
http://www.thetruthseeker.co.uk/?p=138317

Redefining Heterosexuality the Gay Agenda

A Global Public Authority

November 14, 2016

https://thereisnodebt.wordpress.com/2013/03/26/a-global-public-authority/

THE REAL HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA QUESTIONS for the Interrogatories

February 25, 2016

By Rebekah Sutherland at becworks@gmail.com

Part One

Who funded the grants for the land development in the Colonies?
What were the names, founding dates, and connections to the King of England by the original 13 colonies?
Who owned the colonies
Did each colony have its own form of government?
Did the colonies have laws?
Did Christopher Columbus discover and claim any of the original 13 colonies for Spain or Portugal?
What is a Commodity Exchange?
Did the colonies have connections to a Commodity Exchange in England?
Does the word “plantation” mean a large farming enterprise?
Did the King of England operate on his own as a free agent in the creation of the colonies?
Did the Treaty of 1213 actually affect the ownership of the colonies?
What did the Treaty of 1213 actually say?
Part Two

Who were the members of the Board of Trade?
Were Jews allowed on the Board?
Did the original 13 colonies have a court system?
What were the types of jurisdiction assigned to the courts in the colonies?
What is the legal meaning of the word “federal?”
Did Commercial Contracts in the United States evolve from something else?
Is there a difference between Government commerce and Private commerce in law?
Do Admiralty courts still exist today?
Why is there paper money, if the Constitution does not allow it?
Did the British International Bankers have other names in history?
Part Three

Legally DEFINE: Contract, Charter, Compact and Constitution?
Was the United States Constitution a charter, compact, constitution or contract?
In legal terminology, is there a difference between “We, the People” and “We, the people?”
In 1776, who was “We, the People” as is written on the U.S. Constitution?
Why did the aristocrats meet in secret to discuss the constitution?
Who actually wrote the Constitution?
How did the Constitution protect The Crown’s investments in America?
When did the United States come into existence?
What were the terms of the Treaty of 1783?
Who was the “most holy and undivided Trinity” that is mentioned in the declaration paragraph of the Treaty of 1783?
What is the legal definition of the word “church”?
What is the legal definition of the word “business”?
Is the United States actually a church organization, an extension of the Vatican?
Part Four

Was the U.S. Constitution ‘ratified’ or ‘adopted’?
What is the difference between “ratified” and “adopted” in legal terminology?
Why did the wealthy aristocrats choose to adopt the compact called “the Constitution for the United States”, which was sent to them by the Vatican via the King of England on behalf of The Crown?
Part Five

What are the divisions of American Jurisprudence?
What is the difference between Tort Law and Contract Law?
What are the three main parts of a binding contractual agreement?
Is there a legal difference between “signing” and “witnessing” a document?
Was The United States Constitution “signed” or was it “witnessed?”
Did the men who “witnessed” The United States Constitution participating in the beginning of a “con job” for the colonists which continues today?
Part Six

What are the legal jurisdictions mentioned by the United States Constitution and what is involved in each?
Is there a difference between Admiralty Law and Maritime Law?
How did Admiralty Law become the jurisdiction in the Federal Courts?
How does one become financially entangled in the Admiralty Law system in the USA?
What is Statutory Law?
What happened in 1938 that revolutionized American jurisprudence?
Why did the USA judges abandon Public Law and switch to Public Policy for decisions?
For what are the international bankers waiting, if the nation is bankrupted?
Constitutional Consternation Part 1

by R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences

July 10, 2010

Presented to the Americans for Constitutional Government

Sugar Creek Club House – Annual picnic

DISCLAIMERS

1. This author loves government so much that she desires three branches of government; and all three operating in a check-and-balanced manner. I am pro-government when it protects the individual.

2. I am not an attorney, nor do I hand out legal advice. I am an American who was educated in the public school system, which taught “Ignorance of the law is no excuse.” Therefore, I have performed my duty, studied what is available to me, used whatever talents my Creator assigned to me, and the following are my observations based upon knowledge, which the federal government mandated that I develop on my own.

3. This author is not anti-Catholic, anti-Semitic, anti-Protestant, or anti-anything else. This author is Pro-Factual, Pro-Truth, and Pro-Freedom. Everything shared with you is open to your own investigation and interpretation. You are free to “believe” anything you wish.

4. This author is not interested in Conspiracy Theories. A conspiracy by definition must be (1) hidden and (2) illegal. Instead, this author is focused on items that have been written in the legal documents of Record and the legislation by which our freedoms have disappeared. This author is only interested in being extremely correct.

5. My work is not finished. It is entirely selfish. I have no hope, nor any reason, to expect others to accept what I am learning. Forgive me for saying this, but I do not care if you reject it. This investigation is for me. I do not wish to save the world; instead, I must save my own sanity. I must understand why things are happening which appear un-American. I am hunting. You are welcome to read the answers to my questions. I am compiling huge amounts of research into a streamlined format to increase cognitive comprehension and to enhance discussion for further research. My hope is that you will not place yourself in jeopardy to defend the Constitution.

INTRODUCTION

I am a scientist and a teacher with a love for investigative journalism. My love for research was first discovered while sitting on my living room floor surrounded by encyclopedias, magazines, and books, writing a health report in the fifth grade. The love for research is innate. The search for answers to the questions “why” and “how” have created an incredible journey for this soul, which appears to be leading right smack into the center of the prophetic Book of Revelations, the Mayan calendar, the I Chi, and most prophetic works through the ages.

I do not create an opinion, and then find facts to support it. Instead, I find facts, and they lead me to more questions. That is the Scientific Method. When facts are true, then they can be used to predict outcomes with accuracy. That is the only real proof of factual certainty.

PROLOGUE

FACT: The Theory of Cognitive Dissonance [TCD] was developed by Leon Festinger and published by Stanford University Press ( 1957) The theory says that the mind involuntarily rejects information that is not in line with previous thoughts/or actions. Festinger observed: “A person can deal with the pressure generated by changing the dissonance of the old behavior to harmonize with information. But if the person is committed to the old behavior and way of thinking, he simply rejects the new information.” That explains why so many Americans say, “I don’t believe it” when they are presented with new information, and why the Left-leaning agenda is able to brand thinkers as “conspiracy nuts” and “extremists.”

I apologize to many of you today, because you are going to learn things that rearrange the molecules of your brain. When things that we thought were true, are proven false, then it can be traumatic. Do not hide from new realities; instead, embrace them. Make a paradigm shift and go on. Individual responsibility for facts and truths leads one to freedom and independence.

INVESTIGATION

FACT: About 30 years ago, a team of men came together with the sole purpose of going back through the historical legal paperwork to find out why judges were rendering the decisions they were making. The documents and original books filled up a warehouse. Today, most of the team is dead. They were ridiculed for their discoveries, because they had tapped into the real power behind the government. Nonetheless, they discovered the Truth, and one of the team successfully implemented that Truth for himself. He is the only real free Man in the country. I interviewed him five hours and read his works. His knowledge when combined with the other research in my files, led to incredible disclosures and understanding about our government.

CONCLUSION: The United States of America has been locked into a Babylonian economic system the extends from the blend of pagan Emperor Constantine and the Roman Catholic Church in 382 A.D., which is under the control of the King of England, who is owned by the Vatican per the Treaty of 1213. In 1611, King James had the Bible translated into an official English version. King James happened to be the most powerful Freemason in history, because he ruled Scotland and England at the same time. In 1776, the rebellion in the colonies was halted and the aristocrats were placed into “checkmate” by the Vatican, whose message was delivered by the King’s agents. From that point until today, Americans have been taught a Myth about their own history, which holds them in slavery to the most powerful corporation on earth which resides in Rome, Italy. Americans have been deliberately kept ignorant of the Truth.

QUESTION: Is the United States Constitution in effect today?

FACT: President Bush II told the GOP leadership during a meeting about the Patriot Act in November of 2005: QUOTE:”Stop throwing the Constitution in my face! It’s just a goddamned piece of paper!”

FACT: Citizens feel like they are under siege from all branches of government. They must pay taxes and fees that consume over 50% of their earned wages. They formed the National Rifle Association and the Gun Owners of America to prevent the government from taking away firearms, which are supposedly protected under the Second Amendment in the Bill of Rights. There is an invasion from Mexico that is ignored by the federal level, yet it is constitutionally mandated to protect the borders.

QUESTION: Where are the Declaration of Independence and The United States Constitution physically located?

ANSWER: The Declaration of Independence is missing.

QUOTE: In the Woman’s Day magazine, July 7, 2009, there is a box entitled, “Independence Day by the Numbers” which states: “25 = Number of copies of the Declaration of Independence known to exist. (No originals with the famous signatures are known to remain.) END QUOTE

ANSWER: The original handwritten copy of The United States Constitution, according to the National Archives and records Administration, QUOTE: “ . .. Is on display at the National Archives and Records Administration in Washington, D.C.” END QUOTE

QUESTION: Can Americans access all of their pubic documents?

ANSWER: No.

QUOTE: “2006 controversy over reclassification– In March 2006, it was revealed by the Archivist of the United States in a public hearing that a memorandum of understanding between Collins and various government agencies existed to ‘reclassify’, (i.e., withdraw from public access), certain documents in the name of national security, and to do so in a manner such that researchers would not be likely to discover the process. [SOURCE: gwu.edu (http://www.gwu.edu/~nsarchiv/news/20060411/index.htm) (2006-04-11)]

QUESTION: Was the entire creation of the United States of America a con job?

ANSWER: Yes.

QUOTE from Edmond Burke in March 22, 1775 with his Speech on Conciliation with America:

“. . . Let the colonies always keep the idea of their civil rights associated with your government–they will cling and grapple to you, and no force under heaven will be of power to tear them from their allegiance. But let it be once understood that your government may be one thing and their privileges another, that these two things may exist without any mutual relation–the cement is gone, the cohesion is loosened, and everything hastens to decay and dissolution. As long as you have the wisdom to keep the sovereign authority of this country as the sanctuary of liberty, the sacred temple consecrated to our common faith, wherever the chosen race and sons of England worship freedom, they will turn their faces toward you. The more they multiply, the more friends you will have, the more ardently they love liberty, the more perfect will be their obedience. Slavery they can have; they can have it from Spain; they may have it from Prussia. But until you become lost to all feeling of your true interest and your natural dignity, freedom they can have from none but you. This commodity of price, of which you have the monopoly. This is the true Act of Navigation, which binds to you the commerce of the colonies, and through them secures to you the wealth of the world. Deny them this participation of freedom, and you break that sole bond which originally made, and must still preserve, the unity of the empire. . . Let us get an American revenue as we have got an American empire. English privileges have made it all that it is; English privileges alone will make it all it can be.”

QUESTION: Is there legal evidence that the Constitution did not apply to the American people at large from the very beginning?

ANSWER: Yes.

QUOTE:

The Padleford Case

“But, indeed, no private person has a right to complain, by suit in Court, on the ground of a breach in the Constitution. The Constitution, it is true, is a compact, but he is not a party to it. States are the parties to it.

Padleford, Fay & Co. v. The Mayor & Aldermen of the City of Savanna, 14 Ga 438, 520, S.C. Georgia (1854)

Interrogatories about the Constitution and American Law
By R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences

Part One

OBJECTIVE: If you do not know where you came from, then you certainly cannot know where you are going. It is time to review history and pull together some of the lesser known facts for edification and purification of what America was, is and chooses to become. Seek the Truth, and then you will become aware of the shackles on your ankles and the blinders on your eyes.

NOTE: This author has chosen to use well known academic sources for the concepts commonly taught at the high school level. As the answers become more complicated, the more analytical and legal sources will be used. This is an attempt to keep a difficult subject as simple as possible.
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++

QUOTE: “The reason why [deception cannot be forced on an Individual] is because deception has to be first created, then conveyed, and then accepted by others – then only can deception succeed. Deception can only find fertility in a human mind to the extent that mind is receptive to it; similarly, in a sense, it actually takes two people to manufacture a successful lie: the first to utter the lie, and the second to accept it as such.” –1985, Invisible Contracts, by George Mercier.

1. Who funded the grants for the land development in the original 13 Colonies?

ANSWER: There were several entities involved in exploring America, but the King of England was the point of contact. Other countries said that they had claim to lands; however, they were not clever enough to get the paperwork straight, nor were they strong enough to defend their legal Claim; hence, they lost both the legal and physical battle for occupation of America.

2. What were the names, founding dates, and connections to the King of England by the original 13 colonies?

[SOURCE: World Book Encyclopedia (WBE)]

ANSWER:
1067-Virginia – Charter by King to the Virginia Company of London
1620-Massachusetts – Charter granted by the King to the Puritans
1623-New Hampshire – King appointed Council of New England for settlement
1624-New York – Charter by King to Duke of York
1622-Connecticut – Charter by King to John Winthrop
1634-Maryland – Charter by King to Lord Baltimore
1636-Rhode Island – King granted “Charter of Rhode Island & Providence Plantations”
1638-Delaware – Charter by King to Duke of York
1643-Pennsylvania – Grant by King to William Penn
1653-North Carolina – Grant by King to Sir Robert Heath
1660-New Jersey – Grant by King to Duke of York
1670-South Carolina – Grant by King to Eight “Lords Proprietors”
1733-Georgia – Grant by King to a Corporation entitled: “Trustees for Establishing the Colony of Georgia in America

3. Who owned the colonies?

ANSWER: The legal contracting documents for the colonies were of three types, but all of them were under the direction of the King of England:

(a) royal – under the direct control of the King
(b) proprietary-under the control of a Proprietor, an appointed by the King
(c) corporate-under a charter obtained from the King of England by a company with stockholders. [SOURCE: WBE]

4. Did each colony have its own form of government?

ANSWER: Each colony had a governor and a legislature; however, the King of England appointed the governor over the royal colonies. In proprietary colonies, the King appointed the Proprietor, who appointed the governor. In Connecticut and Rhode Island the people elected the governor; however, Connecticut was under the Fundamental Orders until it received a royal charter in 1662 and Rhode Island was under the English charter of 1663, which served as its constitution. [SOURCE: WBE]

5. Did the colonies have laws?

ANSWER: The laws that were passed by any of the colonial legislatures had to be approved by the English government. Governors appointed by the King had the responsibility of carrying out his orders. The King expected them to enforce the laws of England, especially acts of Parliament that regulated colonial trade. [SOURCE: WBE]

6. Did Christopher Columbus discover and claim any of the original 13 colonies for Spain or Portugal?

ANSWER: No. Columbus traveled around the areas of Jamaica, Costa Rica, Panama, etc. [SOURCE: WBE]

7. What is a Commodity Exchange?

ANSWER: “Commodity exchanges are voluntary trade associations. They are called organized markets, because all members must follow certain trading rules. All business, for example, must be conducted on the trading floor within certain hours. Rules set the commission (fee) that may be charged in a transaction, and the time within which payment must be made.” [SOURCE: WBE]

8. Did the colonies have connections to a Commodity Exchange in England?

ANSWER: Yes, It was called the Board of Trade (1621-1970)
QUOTE:
URL: http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/
“The1621 Privy Council, directed by the King, ‘to take into their consideration, the true causes of the decay of trade and scarcity of coin within the Kingdom and to consult the means for the removing of these inconveniences.’ As a result a committee of inquiry was set up named ‘The Committee of Privy Council for Trade and Foreign Plantations’ (this is still the formal title of the ‘Board of Trade’) and this committee can be regarded as the germ of the Board of Trade.”

“Throughout the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries, trade matters remained the responsibility of Privy Council Committees. In 1696 William III set up a body of eight paid Commissioners ‘for promoting the trade of our Kingdom and for inspecting and improving our plantations in America and elsewhere.’”

9. Does the word “plantation” mean a large farming enterprise?

ANSWER: No. The definition found in Burke on Conciliation of the Colonies stated, “Plantations–colonies; the plantings of a new society or race. The term is regularly so used in Acts and Charters, and has no reference whatever to cultivation of the soil.”

10. Did the King of England operate on his own as a free agent in the creation of the colonies?

ANSWER: No. The King of England was bound to the Treaty of 1213. The following brief history explains who was actually in charge of the colonies.

QUOTE:
[ INTRO: The King refused to accept Stephen Langton as the Archbishop of Canterbury by Pope Innocent III in 1208, and the King was excommunicated from the Catholic Church by the Pope for his disobedience to contractual agreements to the Crown. The Pope and the King owed money to the Crown bankers, so the Pope had to reign in a naughty King in order to avoid default to The Crown.]

“Faced with defeat by the forces aligned against him by the Vatican, King John ran for cover, and sought to regain the support of the Pope. He returned the title to his kingdoms of England and Ireland to the Pope, as vassals, swore submission and loyalty to him, accepted Langton as Archbishop of Canterbury, and offered the Pope a vassal’s bond of fealty and homage, an annual tribute of 1,000 marks (equivalent to a bit more than 666 pounds sterling) and the return of the Church property he had seized when he had rebelled against it.

“Two months later, in July 1213, King John was: absolved of excommunication, at Winchester, by the return Arch Bishop of Canterbury Langton.

“Three months later, on October 3, 1213, King John ratified his surrender of his kingdoms to the Pope, who by virtue of his position as Vicar of Christ claims ownership of everything and everyone, on earth in the tradition of the Nazarene-Communist supercapitalist superdictatorship that is true fundamentalist Christianity.

“On April 21, 1214, the Pope, in Rome, formally accepted King John’s surrender of his kingdoms and his pledge of vassal (together with the moneys paid in tribute); and three months later, in July 1214, Pope Innocent III raised the interdict against the English.

“Thus the Pope assured the English of ‘access to Heaven,’ from which they had been ‘barred’ by their king’s opposition to the church’s Nazarene, or Communist, totalitarianism and denial of civil rights to mankind.”

[SOURCE: British Museum Publication G. R. C. Davis, entitled Magna Carta (211), and American Counsel of Christian Laymen: How Red is The Federal Counsel of Churches.]

11. Did the Treaty of 1213 actually affect the ownership of the colonies?

ANSWER: The Vatican owned the colonies, but let the King serve as the manager for the enterprise. The Vatican was busy fighting Crusades and expanding The Kingdom.

12. What did the Treaty of 1213 actually say?

ANSWER: The original Treaty of 1213 is located in the London Archives and is available to Ph.D.s; however, a copy of a translation has been made available. It remains in power to this day. It states:

QUOTE: “The King’s Concessions of May 15, 1213 to the Pope–“We wish it to be known to all of you, through this our charter, furnished with our seal, that inasmuch as we had offended in many ways God and our mother the holy church, and in consequence are known to have very much needed the divine mercy, and can not offer anything worthy for making due satisfaction to God and to the church unless we humiliate ourselves and our kingdoms: we, wishing to humiliate ourselves for Him who humiliated Himself for us unto death, the grace of the Holy Spirit inspiring, not induced by force or compelled by fear, but of our own good and spontaneous will and by the common counsel of our barons, do offer and freely concede to God and His holy apostles Peter and Paul and to our mother the holy Roman church, and to our lord pope Innocent and to his Catholic successors, the whole kingdom of England and the whole kingdom Ireland, with all their rights and appurtenances, for the remission of our sins and of those of our whole race as well for the living as for the dead; and now receiving and holding them, as it were a vassal, from God and the Roman church, in the presence of that prudent man Pandulph, subdeacon and of the household of the lord pope Innocent, and his catholic successors and the Roman church, according to the form appended; and in the presence of the lord pope, if we shall be able to come before him, we shall do liege homage to him; binding our successors aid our heirs by our wife forever, in similar manner to perform fealty and show homage to him who shall be chief pontiff at that time, and to the Roman church without demur. Concessions of May 15, 1213 to the Pope.” [END QUOTE]

End of Part 1

Disclaimer: These interrogatories are not intended as legal advice, nor do they offer any political suggestions to the reader. All verification is left to the reader. The interrogatories by this author are an academic attempt to digest the evidence and instruction found in many sources, and especially in two books entitled: The Myth and The Reality; and A New History for America. The Informer has displayed tremendous intellectual fortitude with his serious scientific analysis of the evidence throughout written history of the events leading up to, during, and following the Revolutionary War. The conclusions are breath-taking upon the first reading, because the evidence demands huge paradigm shifts in knowledge structure and assumption. Americans have no idea who they really are on a global scale, how their Courts came into being, nor why they keep losing nonexistent “Rights.” Well, it is time to ask some very good questions and seek truthful answers. LEARN.

Interrogatories about the Constitution and American Law
By R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences

Part 2

OBJECTIVE: If you do not know where you came from, then you certainly cannot know where you are going. It is time to review history and pull together some of the lesser known facts for edification and purification of what America was, is and chooses to become. This is important.

13. Who were the members of the British Board of Trade?

ANSWER: The Board included agents of the King of England, members of the Privy Council (i.e., legislative bodies), and the Archbishop of Canterbury who represented the Church of England. [SOURCE: World Book Encyclopedia (WBE)]

14. Were Jews allowed on the Board of trade?

ANSWER: No. The Board refused to allow either the Lombards or the Jewish moneylenders onto their Board. They were segregated because their religious rules made them useful for the Board. The following quote is an excellent explanation.

QUOTE: The Federal Reserve Conspiracy and Rockefeller (1952)
By Emanuel Josephson

“Since commerce and money are the livelihoods of nations and their peoples, the control of money is the obvious key to the control of nations and the world. …Rome’s successor the Holy Roman Empire dissimulated its interest in money and its power. This was in accord with its professed tenets of Nazarene, theistic Communism.

“Under ecclesiastic Canon Law, even profits in business transactions were decreed to be the cardinal sin and capital offense of ‘usury’ As late as the sixteenth century, one hundred businessmen were burned at the stake in Geneva, as a penalty under Church law, for making profits in their business transactions. Title to all wealth , as well as to the person and lives of all the earth, are claimed by the Church, on the ground that their ownership is divinely vested in the Pope as the Vicar of Jesus Christ on earth.

“Thus theistic, Nazarene Communism, and the ‘modern’ religion that goes by the name of Communism and is supposedly atheist, both are basically supercapitalist and both mask their grab for money and wealth.

“Title to all wealth was vested in the Church and in its champion ‘knights,’ who at the same time assumed the role of so-called ‘protectors,’ much like the present day labor leaders of their vassals whom they mercilessly enslaved and looted.

“Both Churchmen and lay knights used the despised Jews for the conduct of their usurious financial operations, in order to avoid ‘sinning’ and the death penalty that it involved. The Jews proved very useful and handy for that purpose. Their use was justified by their ‘CHRISTIAN’ masters in a manner that they were taught by their faith was incontrovertible. Jews were damned and doomed by their faith and their failure to accept the divinity of Jesus and the perversion of His teachings by the Jewish merchant, Saul of Tarsus, alias St. Paul, opined the Churchmen; and therefore, it was ‘good work’ to hasten them to damnation.

“This they did by forcing their Jewish serfs to engage, as their pawns, in the ‘sin’ and ‘crime’ of ‘usury’ by which was meant the charging of interest as well as loan sharking and engaging in profitable commerce, for their Christian, ecclesiastical bosses.

“Often the Churchmen barred the Jews, by their orders and laws, from engaging in any other vocation than those to which the stigma of usury was attached, especially loan-sharking, as their agents. This was a particular advantageous set up for the Churchmen. For if the Jew was merciful and failed to extract from the victims everything that they possessed (i.e., the last drop of blood), he was burned at the stake as a ‘heretic.’

“On the other hand, if the Jew mercilessly followed orders of his priestly boss, was honest with his boss and amassed a fortune for him and for himself, there was nothing to bar his Christian master from exercising his cupidity and robbing his faithful loan-shark by charging him with the ‘sin’ of usury, confiscating the fortune he had made in his service, and with great hypocritic show of ‘piety,’ burn him at the stake—‘to ensure his salvation.’

“The victorious Lombard invaders of the Holy Roman Empire changed the financial situation in much the same manner as have the latter day Maffia extortioners and blackmailers. Seizing control of the Church, they gave themselves ‘dispensation’ to disregard the Canon Law on usury. They openly engaged in it from the very steps of the Vatican.

“Dispensation from the Canon on Usury was subsequently granted by the Vatican, in the 15th century, to the German Fuggers, the Rockefellers of that era. Their profits from commerce, usury and the sale of papal dispensations, as agents of the Vatican, grew rapidly, as did their ‘payoff’ to the church. They were heaped with Papal honors. Both their grasping greed and merciless loan-sharking earned for them distrust and terror. When one of their number was elevated to the rank of Cardinal, the Churchmen feared that the Fuggers would reach out and steal the Vatican itself. They then decided that their Jewish pawn were more completely at their mercy, more amenable and safer.

“Trusteeship of the fortune of one of the wealthiest Christian rulers of Europe, whose confidence had been earned by honest and trustworthy dealings during the Napoleonic wars, is the source of the wealth and influence that the Rothechilds acquired in the first decades of the 19th century.

“Subsequently, after making a large loan to the hard pressed Vatican, that no Christian would consider making, they became the fiscal agents of the Vatican, received Papal decorations and preferments, and enforced the policies dictated by the Church. It was largely in this sense that they were ‘international bankers.’ And the policies dictated by them were in effect the policies dictated by the Church. They enforced those policies through their establishments in many lands.

“An amusing story is told of the earliest relations of the Rothschilds with the Vatican. The Vatican found itself short of ready cash after almost half a century of war waged on it for the Jesuit Order by one of its unordained members, Adam Weishaupt, to avenge its abolition, in 1773, as ‘immoral and a menace to the Church and the Faith’ by short lived Pope Clement XIV in his Papal breve Dominus Ac Redemptor.

“Weishaupt and his fellow Jesuits cut off the income to the Vatican by launching and leading the French Revolution; by directing Napoleon’s conquest of Catholic Europe; by the revolt against the Church led by such priests as Father Hidalgo, in Mexico and Latin America; by eventually having napoleon throw Pope Pius Vii in jail at Avignon until he agreed, as the price for his release, to reestablish the Jesuit Order. This Jesuit war on the Vatican was terminated by the Congress of Vienna and by the secret, 1822 Treaty of Verona. . .

“The Rothschilds sought to extend their financial and political dominion to the United States, for themselves primarily to serve their Vatican masters. The Vatican’s interest in the U.S. Republic was clearly revealed in the Treaty of Verona, in which the Jesuit Order pledged itself, as the price of reestablishment, to destroy ‘the works of Satan’ that it had accomplished in setting up, by revolts, representative governments such as republics and so called ‘democracies.’

“Senator Robert Owen pointed out, in the Senate, that the prime target to which the Vatican and the ‘Holy Alliance’ directed the subversive and destructive activities of the Society of Jesus is the United States, [See Congressional Record, April 25, 1916], as well as other republics in the Western Hemisphere. This plot, he related, was the target at which the Monroe Doctrine was directed.

“The Rothschild-Vatican cabal unsuccessfully attempted to gain control over the power of the purse in the U.S. through the First and Second Bank of the United States. They were established under the emergency powers granted the President by the Constitution, as temporary institutions to tide the country through the periods of financial stress occasioned by the Revolutionary and 1812 Wars.” [END QUOTE]

15. Did the original 13 colonies have a court system?

ANSWER: Yes.

QUOTE: “Encyclopedia of American History – “in 1697 the British Board of Trade, under the Navigation Act, established vice-admiralty courts in all the colonies. These courts had jurisdiction over Trade, ordinary maritime cases as well as prize. It even granted jurisdiction by the Act of 1722 over infringements concerning timber. These Admiralty courts, set up under the Townshend Acts, centered final control in America.” [Source: The New History of America, by The Informer, page 4]

16. What were the types of jurisdiction assigned to the courts in the colonies?

ANSWER: Admiralty and maritime.

QUOTE: “Admiralty, by Benedict, 1850:
“Its necessary effect [the Act] was, however, to start the courts on that system of practice, and really to impose upon them, in admiralty and maritime cases, the civil law practice, as that under which they must continue to administer justice, even after the expiration of that act, until further provision could be made.”

“Section 105–The Purpose of the Constitutional Grant–The Essential Harmony of the Maritime Law. The grand purpose of the Constitution was to unify the several states , the whole people, in their national, international, and interstate relations and all other purposes were subordinate and ancillary to this.

“Section 123 – The commission to the Governor as Vice-Admiral was very full, granting, in language so clear that it cannot be misunderstood, an admiralty jurisdiction as wide and beneficial as the most zealous supporters of the English Admiralty ever claimed for it.”

17. What is the legal meaning of the word: “federal”?

ANSWER: The word “federal” simply put means “contract.”
QUOTES: From The American College Dictionary, 1947:
“Federal – 1. Of or pertaining to a compact or a league, esp. a league between nations or states.”
“Compact–an agreement between parties; a covenant; a contract.”

NOTE: The more modern dictionaries are missing the original definitions as the university professors began to reshape society by gradually changing the definitions of words our students learn and use.

18. Did Commercial Contracts in the United States evolve from something else?

ANSWER: Yes.
QUOTE from Section 065, “Invisible Contracts,” by George Mercier:
“Here in the United States, in a Commercial contract factual setting, the word ‘covenant’ is an Old English Law Merchant origin, and now means only a few clauses within a larger contract. . .”

19. Is there a difference between Government commerce and Private commerce in law?

ANSWER: Yes.
QUOTE from Section 387, “Invisible Contracts,” by George Mercier:
“Admiralty Jurisdiction is the KING’S COMMERCE of the High Seas . .. But as for that slice of Commerce going out on the High Seas without the King as a party, that Commerce is called Maritime Jurisdiction, and so Maritime is the private Commerce that transpires in a marine environment. At least, that distinction between Admiralty and Maritime is the way things once were, but no more.”

20. Do Admiralty courts still exist today?

ANSWER: Yes, it is the United States Federal Court system.
QUOTE:
“This is the type of court that exists today and why we cannot bring a pure Article of the Bill of Rights argument into a contract [i.e., federal] court of the Law-Merchant in their civil law. As Benedict states at Section 5,” . .. The civil law was held to be the law of admiralty, and the course of proceedings in admiralty, closely resembled the civil law practice.” All maritime revenue cases, whether State or United States, deals in contract. …
[Source: The New History of America, by The Informer, page 5.]

QUOTE from Section 049, “Invisible Contracts,” by George Mercier.
“In such administrative enforcement proceedings under grievances arising out of privileges and contracts that Congress created, Federal Judges are acting MINISTERIALLY as Legislative Court, functioning as an extension of the agency for the King, and not Judicially as an Article III Court acting like neutral and disinterested referees calling the shots as umpires between adversaries; and so some steps taken by the Judge acting MINISTERIALLY, to shorten the proceedings or otherwise silence the Defendant when irrelevant subject matter is being discussed, are largely non-reversible on appeal. In Northern Pipeline vs Marathon Pipe Line ]458 U.S. 50 (1982)], the Supreme Court ruled that Congress can create non-Article III LEGISLATIVE COURTS in three areas: Territorial Courts, Military Courts Martial, and in disputes involving privileges that Congress created in the first place [MARATHON, id., at pages 64 et seq.]. Participating in that closed private domain of King’s [government] Commerce is very much accepting and benefitting from a privilege created by Congress.

QUOTE:
“A case in admiralty does not, in fact, arise under the Constitution or Laws of the United States.”
American Ins. Co. V Canter, 1 Pet. 511, 545 (1828).

QUOTE: “We don’t use the word constitution in this court,” said the Aiken Federal Judge during a hearing for a Freedom of Information Act violation in the City of Aiken. This author was the Plaintiff, and was awarded damages for the failure of the city to give information per the FOIA, but no discussion about the constitutional merits of the case were allowed to be discussed..

21. The U.S. Constitution states in Article I, Section 8, “The Congress shall have Power . .. To borrow Money on the credit of the United States; . .. To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures”. So, why is there also paper money if it is not constitutional?

ANSWER: It all began in 1751 with the English Parliament.
QUOTE from Source: The New History of America, by The Informer, page 7:
“In March of 1751, the British Board of Trade presented Parliament with a Restraining Act, which barred the Colonies, by law, from issuing paper money and letters of Credit. This gave the King’s orders the validity of formal law. The Colonies didn’t buy it, for it destroyed their control of the trade. You see, there was no gold or silver being mined in America. They had to rely on gold and silver from other countries. England had most of the gold.

“On July 10, 1754, the Confederacy was born because of this, so they could issue paper money, only on their joint order. Ben Franklin had long advocated this.

“In March of 1775, the Pennsylvania Assembly borrowed money and issued bills of Credit without authorization of either King or Governor. The Board of Trade tried another ploy and said that Gold and Silver have intrinsic value, and therefore, should be used by the Colonies. Because of ‘them’ issuing ‘paper money’ it ‘ruins the Colonies,’ so said the Tories.

“Now get this people, Franklin replied to the contrary saying that paper money served as a medium of exchange and credit had made possible the growth of the Colonies and their trade. He told the Board of Trade that the Tories argued that the paper money issued by the colonies was a dilution of their control of wealth.

“This explains why the federal government is denied the power to issue currency other than coin or to set up or charter banks. But they do it under ‘emergency power.’ This is why the present day private Federal Reserve System, counterpart of the British Board of Trade, runs this country today.

“Now you know why the Crown initiated the coin only clause in the Constitution, so the private bankers could control the paper credit. Paper is NOT money.”

QUOTE from Section 390, “Invisible Contracts,’ by George Mercier:
“However, today in the United States, all Commercial contracts that private parties enter into with each other that are under Maritime Jurisdiction, are now also under Admiralty: Reason: the beneficial use and reticulation of Federal Reserve Notes makes the King [government] an automatic silent Equity third party to the arrangements.”

End of Part 2. To be continued …

Disclaimer: These interrogatories are not intended as legal advice, nor do they offer any political suggestions to the reader. All verification is left to the reader. The interrogatories by this author are an academic attempt to digest the evidence and instruction found in many sources, and especially in two books entitled: The Myth and The Reality; and A New History for America. The Informer has displayed tremendous intellectual fortitude with his serious scientific analysis of the evidence throughout written history of the events up to, during, and following the Revolutionary War. The conclusions are breath-taking upon the first reading, because the evidence demands huge paradigm shifts in knowledge structure and assumption. Americans have no idea who they really are on a global scale, how their Courts came into being, nor why they keep losing nonexistent “Rights.” Well, it is time to ask some very good questions and seek truthful answers. LEARN.

Interrogatories about the Constitution and American Law

By R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences

Part 3

OBJECTIVE: If you do not know where you came from, then you certainly cannot know where you are going. It is time to review history and pull together some of the lesser known facts for edification and purification of what America was, is and chooses to become. This is important.

22. What other names were given to the British International Bankers in history?

ANSWER: They were called Fruggers, Knights Templar, Gisors, Tuscans, etc., and today they are called The Crown. [The Myth and The Reality, by The Informer, Page 6]

23. Legally DEFINE: Contract, Charter, Compact and Constitution?

ANSWER:

Contract: “An agreement between two or more persons which creates an obligation to do or not to do a particular thing. . . A legal relationship consisting of the rights and duties of the contracting parties; a promise or set of promises constituting an agreement between the parties that gives each a legal duty to the other and also the right to seek a remedy for the breach of those duties. [Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition]

Charter: “An instrument emanating from the sovereign power, in the nature of a grant, either to the whole nation, or to a class or portion of the people, to a corporation, or to a colony or dependency, assuring to them certain rights, liberties, or powers . .. A charter differs from a constitution, in that the former is granted by the sovereign, while the later is established by the people themselves. [Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition]

Compact: “. . .A contract between parties, which creates obligations and rights capable of being enforced and contemplated as such between the parties, in their distinct and independent characters. . .” [Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition]

Constitution: “ . . . A charter of government deriving its whole authority from the governed. The written instrument agreed upon by the people of the Union, or a particular states, . .. In a more general sense, any fundamental or important law or edict; as the Novel Constitutions of Justinian; the Constitutions of Clarendon.” [Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition]

24. Was the United States Constitution a charter, compact, constitution or contract?

ANSWER: It was a compact between the Vatican, who controlled the King of England, and the aristocrats of the thirteen colonies. [The New History of America, by The Informer, Page 20]

QUOTE: John C. Calhoun, in 1831 said, “The Constitution of the United States is, in fact, a compact, to which each State is a party.” [SOURCE: The New History of America, by The Informer, page 20.]

QUOTE: Thomas Jefferson in 1789 stated, “To this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral party, its co-states forming, as to itself, the other party.”

QUOTE: “Patrick Henry said he was ‘no longer a Virginia, but an American.’ He did not say he was an American citizen, because the compact merged all confederate states as if one, and you couldn’t tell the difference.” [SOURCE: The New History of America, by The Informer, Page 20]

QUOTE: “United States is a place within America and it is not a country. Also, what you were not told were the framers signed the Constitution as witnesses only. In law, that is an impossibility to witness a document no one signed . . . The Constitution was not only never signed by anybody, but it was never delivered by anybody, or to anybody’s agent or attorney. It can therefore be of no more validity as a contract, than can any other instrument that was never signed or delivered . . . On general principles of law and reason, the oaths which these pretended agents of the people take ‘to support the Constitution,’ are of no validity or obligation. And why? For this, if for no other reason, viz., that they are given to nobody. There is no privity (as the lawyers say) –that is, no mutual recognition, consent, and agreement—between those who take these oaths, and any other persons.” [SOURCE: The Myth and The Reality, by The Informer, pages 10-13]

25. In legal terminology, is there a difference between “We, the People” and “We, the people?”

ANSWER: Yes. In the phrase, “We, the People” the capitalized word makes it a proper noun, which means that “the People” was a specific group (i.e., the aristocrats). In the phrase, “We, the people” the common noun indicates that the phrase refers to people in a general sense. [The Myth and The Reality, by The Informer, Pages 25-26]

26. In 1776, who was “We, the People” referring to in the U.S. Constitution?

ANSWER: The “People” referenced by the Constitution were the wealthy aristocrats. All of the men held Grants and Charters with the King. They owed him, as well as The Crown, interest on the credit extended to them for planting the new society. They profited very well from their exports all over the world. [The Myth and The Reality, by The Informer, Page 23]

QUOTE: Patrick Henry said, “ . .. But, Sir, give me leave to demand, what right had they to say, ‘We, the People? If the States be not the agents of this compact, it must be one great consolidated National Government of the people of all the states.” [SOURCE: The Myth and The Reality, by The Informer, page25.]

27. Why did the aristocrats meet in secret to discuss the Constitution?

ANSWER: The Founding Fathers were in very big trouble. They were wealthy men, who had credit with the King via The Crown. They owed contractual debts, which the King expected them to pay. The Crown fronted the money for the King’s enterprise, so the International Bankers would hold the King responsible for that debt, if the colonists refused to pay their debts. All were obligated to the King with written and signed contracts. The leaders in the colonies were held responsible for the rebellion (i.e., Revolutionary War). They were wealthy aristocrats, who also had large parcels of land, huge estates, and other revenue producing businesses back in the old country. The Vatican controlled King placed the wealthy aristocrats into a political ‘checkmate’. The King sent them a choice. They could lose everything they owned in Europe, or they could quietly go along with a form of government that would allow the King to manipulate the future, on behalf of The Crown, for profit, and the aristocrats would go along with a lie to the people, which was to tell them they won the war. The wealthy men chose to deceive the public. They were told to Witness their agreement on the compact document to pledge that they would cooperate with the King. The compact was called “The Constitution for the United States”, which is duly stated in paragraph number one of the document. [SOURCE: The Myth and The Reality, by The Informer, pages 22-24]

NOTICE the words “for the United, because these men did something on behalf of unsuspecting fellow countrymen. The public school system and elected officials have created a wonderful myth for us to believe about the derivation of the Constitution, but it was not an honorable meeting.

28. Who actually wrote the Constitution?

ANSWER: The Vatican along with The Crown drafted the constitution, and the King’s agents delivered it to the aristocrats in America for witnessing. [SOURCE: The Myth and The Reality, by The Informer, Pages 22-27.]

29. How did the Constitution protect The Crown’s investments in America?

ANSWER: Article VI of the Constitution states: “All Debts contracted and Engagements entered into, before the Adoption of this Constitution, shall be as valid against the United States under this Constitution as under the Confederation. . . ”

30. When did the United States actually come into existence?

ANSWER: The website for the Central Intelligence Agency states: “Britain’s American colonies broke with the mother country in 1776 and were recognized as the new nation of the United States of America following the Treaty of Paris in 1783.”

NOTICE: The USA was not official for seven years after the announced “victory” of the Revolutionary War.

31. What were the terms of the Treaty of Paris in 1783?

QUOTE:

The Ten Articles of the Treaty of 1783

Courtesy of the National Archives and Records Administration.

Preface. Declares the treaty to be “in the name of the most holy and undivided Trinity,” states the bona fides of the signatories, and declares the intention of both parties to “forget all past misunderstandings and differences” and “secure to both perpetual peace and harmony.”

1. Acknowledging the Thirteen Colonies to be free, sovereign and independent States, and that the British Crown and all heirs and successors relinquish claims to the Government, propriety, and territorial rights of the same, and every part thereof;[2]

2. Establishing the boundaries between the United States and British North America (for an account of two strange anomalies resulting from this part of the Treaty, based on inaccuracies in the Mitchell Map—see Northwest Angle and the Republic of Indian Stream);

3. Granting fishing rights to United States fishermen in the Grand Banks, off the coast of Newfoundland and in the Gulf of Saint Lawrence;

4. Recognizing the lawful contracted debts to be paid to creditors on either side;

5. The Congress of the Confederation will “earnestly recommend” to state legislatures to recognize the rightful owners of all confiscated lands “provide for the restitution of all estates, rights, and properties, which have been confiscated belonging to real British subjects [Loyalists]”;

6. United States will prevent future confiscations of the property of Loyalists;

7. Prisoners of war on both sides are to be released and all property left by the British army in the United States unmolested (including slaves);

8. Great Britain and the United States were each to be given perpetual access to the Mississippi River;

9. Territories captured by Americans subsequent to treaty will be returned without compensation;

10. Ratification of the treaty was to occur within six months from the signing by the contracting parties.

* Spain received East and West Florida under the separate Anglo-Spanish peace agreement

[SOURCE: Wikipedia.com]

32. Who was the “most holy and undivided Trinity” that is mentioned in the declaration paragraph of the Treaty of 1783?

ANSWER: The Vatican, the King of England, and The Crown (i.e., international bankers). [SOURCE: The Myth and The Reality, by The Informer, Page 100]

33. What is the legal definition of the word “church”?

ANSWER: A simple definition of church would be that it is a business.

QUOTE: “Church–In its most general sense, the religious society founded and established by Jesus Christ, to receive, preserve, and propagate His doctrines and ordinances. It may also mean a body of communicants gathered into church order; body or community of Christians, united under one form of government by the profession of the same faith and observance of the same ritual and ceremonies; place where persons regularly assemble for worship; congregation; organization for religious purposes; religious society or body; the clergy or officialdom of a religious body.” [Black’s Law Dictionary]

34. What is the legal definition of the word “business”?

QUOTE: “. . . Enterprise in which person engaged shows willingness to invest time and capital on future outcome. Doggett v Burnet, 62 App.D.C. 103, 65 F.2d 191, 194.” [Black’s Law Dictionary]

35. Is the United States actually a church organization, an extension of the Vatican?

ANSWER: Yes.

QUOTE: “If North Carolina is only a geographical place in America in which the State resides along with you, who is supreme? Is not the State a corporate religion? Is the Lord a religion? I think not. Are there many religions in the State? To be recognized as a religion do not those religions have to register with the IRS/FED/STATE team to get a 501c-3 exemption? This goes against what the “government” preaches, that being, church and State separation. Government drones are hypocrites, because to be a church you must be controlled by the very State that boasts that church and State must not mix. This is where logical minds do not prevail in the masses and they have no reasoning or common sense. Who then is the master, if the State will not recognize the religion, if not licensed? So one religion controls all others through license. Shades of merry ole England and the Crown that controlled all religions before the what, revolutionary war? But what if you are under another “church” called government? The Lord said he set His Church upon this Rock, meaning he set His GOVERNMENT upon this earth, NOT some church building or religion . . . you can see why the State is telling you that they can’t mix the Church (Government) of the Lord and the State’s government (church?). How fatuous to believe we are free people and can worship the Almighty and follow His laws without the Crown interfering; paying taxes to a rogue IRS that cannot be proven to be created by the legislature and which operates through fear, extortion, threats, killings, jailing, seizures, suicides and the like to keep everyone in bondage to pay a tribute to the elite integrationists using England as a front since it too went bankrupt before the United States did in 1861. . . [The New History of America, by The Informer, Pages 16-17]

End of Part 3. To be continued …

Disclaimer: These interrogatories are not intended as legal advice, nor do they offer any political suggestions to the reader. All verification is left to the reader. The interrogatories by this author are an academic attempt to digest the evidence and instruction found in many sources, and especially in two books entitled: The Myth and The Reality; and A New History for America. The Informer has displayed tremendous intellectual fortitude with his serious scientific analysis of the evidence throughout written history of the events up to, during, and following the Revolutionary War. The conclusions are breath-taking upon the first reading, because the evidence demands huge paradigm shifts in knowledge structure and assumption. Americans have no idea who they really are on a global scale, how their Courts came into being, nor why they keep losing nonexistent “Rights.” Well, it is time to ask some very good questions and seek truthful answers. LEARN.

Interrogatories about the Constitution and American Law
By R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences

Part 4

OBJECTIVE: If you do not know where you came from, then you certainly cannot know where you are going. It is time to review history and pull together some of the lesser known facts for edification and purification of what America was, is and chooses to become. Seek the Truth, and then you will become aware of the shackles on your ankles and the blinders on your eyes.
36. Was the U.S. Constitution “ratified” or “adopted”?

ANSWER: It was adopted.

QUOTE: [Preamble to the Bill of Rights – “THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution …”

37. What is the difference between “ratified” and “adopted” in legal terminology?

ANSWER:

“Adopt. To accept, appropriate, choose, or select. To make that one’s own (property or act) which was not so originally. To accept, consent to, and put into effective operation; as in the case of a constitution, constitutional amendment, ordinance, court rule, or by-law.”

“Ratify. To approve and sanction; to make valid; to confirm; to give sanction to. To authorize or otherwise approve, retroactively, an agreement or conduct either, expressly or by implication.”

[SOURCE: Black’s Law Dictionary]

38. Why did the wealthy aristocrats choose to adopt the compact called “The Constitution for the United States”, which was sent to them by the Vatican via the King of England on behalf of The Crown?

ANSWER: The King had the leaders of the colonies in a ‘checkmate.’ They owed him money.

QUOTE: “In March of 1775 the Pennsylvania Assembly borrowed money and issued bills of Credit without authorization of either King or [appointed] Governor.” [The New History of America by The Informer, Page 7]

QUOTE from Our Enemy the State, by Albert J. Nock:

“ . . . More than half the delegates to the constitutional convention in 1787 were either investors or speculators in the public funds. Probably sixty percent of the values represented by these securities were fictitious, and were so regarded even by their holders.

QUOTE from The New History of America, by The Informer, Pages 31-33:

“They also had many land holdings and businesses in Europe . . . Well, they won independence from the King until the King wanted all his money he invested in his British colonies, now called the confederate states. If the British Board of Trade was concerned in 1700 about losing wealth, then this was the time for them to take control of the situation. After all, paper money was being printed in just about every confederate state, thereby wiping out the Bank of England’s control of the wealth. The Treaty of 1606 still existed, (see James Montgomery’s work) so the King gave the ultimatum to the ‘men.’ . . .

“America had no navy to defend the waters. It was dependent on the trading with foreign countries of Europe using British trading ships. America was not yet self sufficient. The King knowing this said to the men, I will seize all your property and business in England, under escheat. I will run a blockade on the ocean and allow no trading to be carried on. I will have total control in the amount of time your stores run out due to lack of trade. They knew it was just a matter of time for this to happen, so, they agreed to cut a deal.

“This deal was to make the confederation appear to be very frail so they could draft up a compact. This compact would suck in all the states in which the states would be forbidden to use their own paper money. The corporate States, which you did not create, were bound to pay their debts in silver, Article 1, Section 10, Clause 1. But, it cannot extend to the people, they can use anything they want. Now you can understand a little better what I stated near the beginning about the British Board of Trade controlling the whole works. . . As Patrick Henry stated, are you starting to ‘Smell a Rat?’

“ Is it any wonder why the ‘We, the People’ rushed to seal the deal between the King and themselves, leaving us the little people in the dark? . . This would allow the British Board of Trade to use its international banking cartel to again control the trade through the use of its paper notes. In exchange the King would solidify, by two more treaties, under the compact/agreement of the new Constitution, his hold on his property in America. England was very near bankruptcy and had to hold onto its holdings in America. Being business men, the ‘We’s’ jumped at the offer and a ‘new constitution’ was formed. It was formed by “WE the People.” Was the We the People the 75% of the people in America? No! The “We the People” were only those that drafted the Constitution, therefore the need for the capital P in People. …

“So after all the smoke cleared the people had a new King and some vice-admirals called governors of each of the political subdivision. Those in power still ruled the 75% of the masses that didn’t give a darn.”

End of Part 4 . . . to be continued

Disclaimer: These interrogatories are not intended as legal advice, nor do they offer any political suggestions to the reader. All verification is left to the reader. The interrogatories by this author are an academic attempt to digest the evidence and instruction found in many sources, and especially in two books entitled: The Myth and The Reality; and A New History for America. The Informer has displayed tremendous intellectual fortitude with his serious scientific analysis of the evidence throughout written history of the events leading up to, during, and following the Revolutionary War. The conclusions are breath-taking upon the first reading, because the evidence demands huge paradigm shifts in knowledge structure and assumption. Americans have no idea who they really are on a global scale, how their Courts came into being, nor why they keep losing nonexistent “Rights.” Well, it is time to ask some very good questions and seek truthful answers. LEARN.

Interrogatories about the Constitution and American Law

By R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences

Part 5

OBJECTIVE: If you do not know where you came from, then you certainly cannot know where you are going. It is time to review history and pull together some of the lesser known facts for edification and purification of what America was, is and chooses to become. This is important.

39. What are the divisions of American Jurisprudence?

ANSWER: There are two major divisions: Tort Law and Contract Law. [Invisible Contracts, by George Mercier. Section 013.]

QUOTE: In Section 018, Invisible Contracts, by George Mercier states:

“In general terms, both American Jurisprudence and Nature that it is modeled after are divided into actions that fall generally under Tort Law and Contract Law.. . . For a presentation of the history of the bifurcation of Law into Tort and Contract going back into 1200 A.D., see C.H.S. Fifoot in HISTORY AND SOURCES OF THE COMMON LAW, TORT AND CONTRACT; [Stevens and Sons, London (1949)].

40. What is the difference between Tort Law and Contract Law?

QUOTE: In Sections 018-021 , Invisible Contracts, by George Mercier states:

“Very simply, Contract Law applies to govern a settlement of a grievance whenever a contract is in effect. This means that only certain types of very narrow arguments are allowed to be plead in Contract Law grievances, since only the content of the contract is of any relevance in the grievance settlement . . .”Commercial contracts are born, live and then die, in their own strata, without the Constitution offering any significant restrainment on Legislative intervention . . .In contrast . . . we have Tort Law. Think of Tort Law as being a Judgment Law to settle grievances between persons where there are damages, but without any contract in effect between the parties.”

EXAMPLES of Contract Law: (1) Securities law, (2) Estate Inheritance law, (3) Quasi-Contracts, etc.

EXAMPLES of Tort Law: (1) Civil Rights, (2) Wrongful Death, (3) Product Liability, (4) Aviation law, (5) Personal Injury, (6) Accident Recovery, (7) Professional Malpractice, (8) Unfair Competition, (9) Admiralty and Maritime Torts, (10) Fraud and Anti-Trust actions, etc.

QUOTE: Wigmore, Select Cases on the Law of Torts, page vii (1912 states:

“Never did a Name so obstruct a true understanding of the Thing. To such a plight has it brought us that a favorite mode of defining a Tort is to declare merely that it is not a Contract. As if a man were to define Chemistry by pointing out that it is not Physics or Mathematics.”

41. What are the three main parts of a binding contractual agreement?

ANSWER: The three parts of a binding contract are: Offer, Acceptance, and Consideration.

Explanation: (1) An Offer must be made to someone else, (2) .the Offer must be voluntarily Accepted, and (3) if both parties “voluntarily give, exchange, perform, or promise one another something of value, then you’ve got Consideration. [SOURCE: Law for Dummies, by John Ventura, JD, Page 16]

QUOTE: In Section 013 of, Invisible Contracts, by George Mercier states:

“ … A perfect, well-rounded contract requires not only a promise and a Consideration, but a participation by each party in both of these elements . . .” – Edward Bennett in Considerations Moving From Third Persons in 9 Harvard law Review 233, at 233 (1895).

QUOTE: In Section 001 of, Invisible Contracts, by George Mercier states:

“Whenever there is an exchange of benefits and there remains some lingering expectations of some duty between two parties, then an actual INVISIBLE CONTRACT is in effect . . . as it is said that the duty owed back to the party initially transferring the benefits is RECIPROCAL in nature.”

42. Is there a legal difference between “signing” and “witnessing” a document?

ANSWER: Yes.

QUOTE: “Sign –To affix one’s name to a writing or instrument, for the purpose of authenticating or executing it, or to give it effect as one’s act. . . To make any mark, as upon a document, in token of knowledge, approval acceptance, or obligation.”

QUOTE: “Witness – In general, one who, being present, personally sees or perceives a thing; a beholder, spectator, or eyewitness. . . One who testifies to what he has seen, heard, or otherwise observed. . . A person attesting genuiness of signature to document by adding his signature. .. One who is called upon to be present at a transaction, or the making of a will. . . “ [Black’s Law Dictionary, 6th Edition]

43. Was The United States Constitution “signed” or was it “witnessed?”

ANSWER: Read the document. It states, “Done in Convention by the Unanimous Consent of the States present the Seventeenth Day of September in the Year of our Lord one thousand seven hundred and Eighty seven and of the Independence of the United States of America the Twelfth in Witness whereof We have hereunto subscribed our Names, . . .”

NOTE: Remember in Part 3, Item 25, one learned the difference between “We, the People” and “We, the people.” The constitution was created for and witnessed by a specific body of men, and it did not apply to the more general population, which is clearly noted in the way it uses capital letters.

44. Did the men who “witnessed” The United States Constitution participating in the beginning of a “con job” for the colonists which continues today?

ANSWER: Yes.

QUOTE from Edmond Burke in March 22, 1775 with his Speech on Conciliation with America:

“. . . Let the colonies always keep the idea of their civil rights associated with your government–they will cling and grapple to you, and no force under heaven will be of power to tear them from their allegiance. But let it be once understood that your government may be one thing and their privileges another that these two things may exist without any mutual relation–the cement is gone, the cohesion is loosened and everything hastens to decay and dissolution. As long as you have the wisdom to keep the sovereign authority of this country as the sanctuary of liberty, the sacred temple consecrated to our common faith, wherever the chosen race and sons of England worship freedom, they will turn their faces toward you. The more they multiply, the more friends you will have, the more ardently they love liberty, the more perfect will be their obedience. Slavery they can have; tey can have it from Spain; they may have it from Prussia. But until you become lost to all feeling of your true interest and your natural dignity, freedom they can have from none but you. This commodity of price, of which you have the monopoly. This is the true Act of Navigation, which binds to you the commerce of the colonies, and through them secures to you the wealth of the world. Deny them this participation of freedom, and you break that sole bond which originally made, and must still preserve, the unity of the empire. . . Let us get an American revenue as we have got an American empire. English privileges have made it all that it is; English privileges alone will make it all it can be.”

End of Part 5. To be continued …

Disclaimer: These interrogatories are not intended as legal advice, nor do they offer any political suggestions to the reader. All verification is left to the reader. The interrogatories by this author are an academic attempt to digest the evidence and instruction found in many sources, and especially in two books entitled: The Myth and The Reality; and A New History for America. The Informer has displayed tremendous intellectual fortitude with his serious scientific analysis of the evidence throughout written history of the events up to, during, and following the Revolutionary War. The conclusions are breath-taking upon the first reading, because the evidence demands huge paradigm shifts in knowledge structure and assumption. Americans have no idea who they really are on a global scale, how their Courts came into being, nor why they keep losing nonexistent “Rights.” Well, it is time to ask some very good questions and seek truthful answers. LEARN.

Interrogatories about the Constitution and American Law

By R.E. Sutherland, M.Ed./sciences

Part 6

OBJECTIVE: If you do not know where you came from, then you certainly cannot know where you are going. It is time to review history and pull together some of the lesser known facts for edification and purification of what America was, is and chooses to become. This is important.

45. What are the legal jurisdictions mentioned by the United States Constitution and what is involved in each?

ANSWER: Common Law, Equity Law, and Admiralty/Maritime Law. [Source: UCC Connection, by Howard Freeman, page 5]

Common Law. “In general, it is a body of law that develops and derives through judicial decisions, as distinguished from legislative enactments. The ‘common law’ is all the statutory and case law background of England and the American colonies before the American revolution.” [Source: Black’s Law Dictionary]

LAYMEN definition: There is no Compelled Law. Covers a damages. This is Criminal law.

Equity Jurisdiction. “In a general sense, the jurisdiction belonging to a court of equity..” [Source: Black’s Law Dictionary]

LAYMEN definition: One is compelled to perform to the letter of any contract. This is CIVIL law.

Admiralty law and Maritime Law. Involves commerce on the High Seas and International Contracts. Involves Compelled Performance with Criminal Penalties.

46. Is there a difference between Admiralty Law and Maritime Law?

ANSWER: Yes.

(1) Admiralty Law. Commerce on the high seas that involves the King (i.e., government).

QUOTE: Admiralty is a subdivision of King’s Commerce such that all of King’s Commerce that takes place over waterways and the High Seas . .. Is assigned to be governed by a special set of grievance settlement and evidentiary rules, just custom tailored to Commerce of that nature . . . at least that was the case in the old days when Admiralty was once restricted to govern legitimate business transactions with the King out on the High Seas. . .. On land, assigning fault and making partial recovery by the responsible party is quite common, but not so out on the High Seas. So this special marine jurisdiction (and ‘jurisdiction’ meaning here is simply a special set of rules) was developed organically, piece by piece and sometimes Case by Case . . . Also, some of the other special rules applicable to grievances brought into a Court of Admiralty are that there is no jury in Admiralty–NEVER– everything is handled summarily before a Judge in chronologically compressed proceedings. Also, there are no fixed rules of law or evidence (meaning that it is somewhat like an Administrative Proceeding in the sense that it is a gree-wheeling evidentiary jurisdiction–anything goes). SOURCE: Invisible Contracts, by George Mercier, Section 383]

(2) Law Merchant. “Commerce on the high seas that does not involve the King (i.e. government).”

QUOTE: “The system of law which particularly relates to marine commerce and navigation, to business transacted at sea or relating to navigation, to ships and shipping, to seamen, to the transportation of persons and property by sea, and to marine affairs generally. “ [Black’s Law Dictionary]

47. How did Admiralty Law become the jurisdiction in the Federal Courts?

ANSWER: Federal Reserve Notes

QUOTE: “Up until the mid-1800s here in the United States, very frequently merchants paid off each other in gold coins and company notes . .. It was infrequent that the King had an involvement with private Maritime Commerce. And there was an easy-to-see distinction in effect back then between Maritime Jurisdiction contracts that involved private parties . . . and Admiralty Jurisdiction, which applied to Commercial contracts where the King was a party. . .. However, today in the United States, all Commercial contracts that private parties enter into whith each other that are under Maritime Jurisdiction, are now also under Admiralty: Reason: The beneficial use and recirculation of Federal Reserve Notes makes the King an automatic silent Equity third party to the arrangements.” [Source: Invisible Contracts, by George Mercier, Section 390]

QUOTE: “This concept of using Admiralty as a slick tool for Revenue Raising is an important concept to understand, as this procedure to raise revenue through an invisible Admiralty Contract is now surfacing in the United States in the very last place where anyone would think a marine based jurisdictional environment belongs: On your Internal Revenue Service’s 1040 form. . . “ [Source: Invisible Contracts, by George Mercier, Section 396]

48. How does one become financially entangled in the Admiralty Law system in the USA?

ANSWER: The Birth Certificate combined with the adult who performs Acceptance of Benefits.

QUOTE: “But later through a Federal Judge, I realized that there are special financial benefits that persons documented as being politically enfranchised at birth, experience later on as adults, when they are being shaken down for a smooth Federal looting; and it is this Acceptance of Benefits as adults, in the context of reciprocity being expected back in return, that attaches contract tax liability, and not the existence of a Birth Certificate document itself. . . As a point of beginning, one person cannot bind another. But most importantly, all the Birth Certificate and correlative documents in the world will not separate a dime in taxation from you until such time as you, individually, and personally, have started to accept juristic benefits.” [Source: Invisible Contracts, by George Mercier, Section 411]

QUOTE: “Remember that when benefits are being accepted in the context of reciprocity being expected back in return, then there lies a good tight contract.” {Source: Invisible Contracts, by George Mercier, Section 412]

49. What is Statutory Law?

ANSWER: Codified Merchant Law.

QUOTE: Statutory Law. “That body of law created by acts of the legislature in contrast to constitutional law and law generated by decisions of courts and administrative bodies.” [Source: Black’s Law Dictionary]

QUOTE: “The word “colorable” means something that appears to be genuine, but is not. Maybe it looks like a dollar, and maybe it spends like a dollar, but if it is not redeemable for lawful money (silver or gold) it is “colorable.” If a Federal Reserve Note is used in a contract, then the contract becomes a “colorable” contract. And “colorable” contracts must be enforced under a “colorable jurisdiction.” So by creating Federal Reserve Notes, the government had to create a jurisdiction to cover the kinds of contracts, which use them. We now have what is called Statutory Jurisdiction, which is not a genuine Admiralty jurisdiction. It is “colorable” Admiralty Jurisdiction the judges are enforcing because we are using “colorable money.” Colorable Admiralty is now known as Statutory Jurisdiction.” [UCC Connection, by Howard Freeman, page 6]

50. What happened in 1938 that revolutionized American jurisprudence?

QUOTE from a judge to an attorney: “Name any decision of the Supreme Court after 1938 and I’ll honor it, but all the decisions you read were prior to 1938, and I don’t honor those decisions. Prior to 1938, the Supreme Court was dealing with Public Law; since 1938, the Supreme Court has dealt with Public Policy. . . .” [UCC Connection, by Howard Freeman, page 3]

QUOTE by the attorney: “I found that 1938 was the year of the Erie Railroad v. Tompkins case of the Supreme Court. It was also the year the courts claim they blended Law with Equity. I read the Erie Railroad case . .. The district court had decided on the basis of Commercial (Negotiable Instruments) Law: That this man was not under any contract with the Erie Railroad, and therefore he had no standing to sue the company . .. This overturned a standing decision of over one hundred years . .. In the Erie Railroad case, the Supreme Court ruled that all federal cases would be judged under the Negotiable Instruments Law. There would be no more decisions based on the Common Law at the federal level . .. All our courts since 1938 were merchant Law courts and not Common Law courts.” [UCC Connection, by Howard Freeman, page 4]

51. Why did the USA judges abandon Public Law and switch to Public Policy for decisions?

QUOTE from a Judge: “In 1938, all the higher judges, the top attorneys and the U.S. attorneys were called into a secret meeting and this is what we were told: America is a bankrupt nation–it is owned completely by its creditors. The creditors own the Congress, they own the Executive, they own the Judiciary and they own all the state governments. Take a silent judicial notice of this fact, but never reveal it openly. Your court is operating in an Admiralty Jurisdiction–call it anything you want, but do not call it Admiralty.” [UCC Connection, by Howard Freeman, page 4]

QUOTE from a Judge: “The reason they cannot call it Admiralty Jurisdiction is that your defense would be quite different in Admiralty Jurisdiction from your defense under the Common Law. In Admiralty, there is no court, which has jurisdiction unless there is a valid international contract in dispute. If you know it is Admiralty Jurisdiction, and they have admitted on the record that you are in an Admiralty Court, you can demand that the international maritime contract, to which you are supposedly a party, and which you supposedly have breached, be placed into evidence No court has Admiralty/Maritime Jurisdiction unless there is a valid international maritime contract that has been breached. So you say, just innocently like a lamb, ‘Well, I never knew that I got involved with an international maritime contract, so I deny that such a contract exists. If this court is taking jurisdiction in Admiralty, then place the contract in evidence, so that I may challenge the validity of the contract. What they would have to do is palce the national debt into evidence. They would have to admit that the international bankers own the whole nation, and that we are their slaves.”” [UCC Connection, by Howard Freeman, page 5]

52. For what are the international bankers waiting if the nation is bankrupted?

QUOTE by an attorney: “But the bankers said it is not expedient at this time (i.e., 1980s) to admit that they own everything and could foreclose on every nation of the world. The reason they don’t want to tell everyone that they own everything is that there are still too many privately owned guns. There are uncooperative armies and other military forces. So until they can gradually consolidate all armies into a World Army and all courts into a single World Court, it is not expedient to admit the jurisdiction the courts are operating under. . .” [UCC Connection, by Howard Freeman, page 5]

Disclaimer: These interrogatories are not intended as legal advice, nor do they offer any political suggestions to the reader. All verification is left to the reader. The interrogatories by this author are an academic attempt to digest the evidence and instruction found in many sources, and especially in two books entitled: The Myth and The Reality; and A New History for America. The Informer has displayed tremendous intellectual fortitude with his serious scientific analysis of the evidence throughout written history of the events up to, during, and following the Revolutionary War. The conclusions are breath-taking upon the first reading, because the evidence demands huge paradigm shifts in knowledge structure and assumption. Americans have no idea who they really are on a global scale, how their Courts came into being, nor why they keep losing nonexistent “Rights.” Well, it is time to ask some very good questions and seek truthful answers. LEARN.

THE ROTHSCHILDS PAPAL KNIGHTS OF ROME

July 8, 2014

For those who doubt the balance of power between the Rothschilds, British Royalty and; the Papacy, I have compiled the following collection of information showing verifiable Papal & Royal knighthoods bestowed on the Rothschilds. These do not include any deduced or hearsay knighthoods. Note that in the Grand scheme of things these knighthoods are not even from the most elite of such orders, e.g. the Garter or the Bath to name but two. I would draw your attention to the two following articles which reveal many of the covert connections in European (and; thus international) finance, politics, military and; intelligence. These give a taste of the extent of influence of Catholic and; Papal-loyal elites, including knighthood orders such as the SMOM (Knights of Malta) and; Franco-Neapolitan branch of the Constantinian Order. The Venetian & Genoese aristocracy and; their so called Black Nobility descendants are given some context here too:

** Italy’s Black Prince: Terror War Against the Nation-State

** Le Cercle and the Struggle for the European Continent

There are other good sources that touch on the Vatican’s wealth, including David Yallop’s “In God’s Name” (which is by no means an anti-Catholic polemic). How anyone can think that the Rothschilds are the pinnacle of power is beyond me. Very powerful? Yes. The mind behind the all-seeing eye? No way. We have to look much deeper beyond these Kabbalistically-minded businessmen. While not wishing to diminish the truth about their influence, we must keep things in perspective.Sir Evelyn de Rothschild, former head of the now British Rothschild banking interests (now united with the French Rothschild banking interests & overseen since 2003 by David René de Rothschild) being interviewed on intelligence-controlled television & his son David Mayer de Rothschild on the Alex Jones radio show? Hilarious. Evelyn de Rothschild US & UK TV interviews, late 2008:

** Evelyn de Rothschild U.K. Interview 2008

Watch the end of the latter one for some humour. The English interviewer was most pleased with his encounter! David Mayer de Rothschild interviewed by Alex “C.I.A. asset, Jesuit Coadjutor” Jones on the matter of Live Earth concert, which event took place on the Kabbalistically-significant 7/7/07:

** Alex Jones – David Mayer De Rothschild Interview

The Jesuit Superior-General Adolfo Nicolas, Pope Benedict XVI, SMOM Grand Master Matthew Festing, Constantinian Grand Masters the Duke of Castro & Duke of Calabria, Queen Elizabeth II: would any of them lower themselves in this manner? No chance. Most people have only heard about the Pope & the Queen out of that lot. They make fork-tongued speeches for the Profane to accept on face value. Evelyn de Rothschild was invested as a Knight in 1989, though not of any Order that I have been able to find. This would mean that he is a Knight Bachelor. Some conspiracy sites state that he is a Knight of the British Empire, however I have only been able to confirm that his dynastic cousin Lord Jacob is a knight of that order:

** Sir Evelyn Robert Adrian de Rothschild

** Knight Bachelor

Lord Jacob (the 4th Baron) Rothschild was made a Member of the Queen’s Order of Merit (personally selected & bestowed by the Monarch, this is directly below the rank of Knight Grand Commander of the Order of the Bath in terms of honour) in 2002 & Knight Grand Cross of the Order of the British Empire in 1998. Note that his title of Baron Rothschild is a UK title going back to 1885. He is also – & perhaps confusingly – the 5th Baronet Rothschild, a UK title going back to 1847 & the current Baron von Rothschild, an Austrian Empire title dating back to 1822. We should also note that in 1985 he was made a Commander of the Order of Henry the Navigator of Portugal:

** Sir Nathaniel Charles Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild

His father Lord Victor (the 3rd Baron) Rothschild was made a Knight Grand Cross of the British Empire in 1975 & was also a Knight of the Queen’s Order of St John:

** Sir Nathaniel Mayer Victor Rothschild, 3rd Baron Rothschild

The Queen, as Sovereign of the Order of St John (& of the Order of Sts Michael & George, which just recently bestowed an Honorary Knighthood on Jesuit/Vatican asset & Freemason Shimon Peres) is the head of a franchise of the Pope’s Order of Malta, the SMOM. Thus she is a Dame of Malta. As the Rothschilds defer to Queen, so do they both defer to the Papacy & ultimately to the Jesuit General. For good databases of Sir Evelyn & Lord Jacob’s (& Lord Victor’s) New World Order-related connections, see:

** Lord Jacob Rothschild (and his father Victor)Sir Evelyn de Rothschild

There is also a bio for the French Baron Edmond de Rothschild there:

** Baron Edmond de Rothschild

The current Lord Rothschild’s son, Nat, has no such honours & nor does his cousin David Mayer de Rothschild, nor does the united French & British Rothschilds banking head David René de Rothschild. And nor have any of their other respective paternal ancestors other than those listed above, as far as my research has turned up:

** Check (1)

** Check (2)

** Check (3)

Note that the Great Great Great Great (yes, that’s four Greats!) Grandfather of Lord Jacob Rothschild & the Great Great Great Grandfather of Sir Evelyn & David René de Rothschild – Mayer Amschel Rothschild, the founder of the Rothschild international banking dynasty, was made an Imperial (Holy Roman Empire) Crown Agent in 1800:

** Mayer Amschel Rothschild

Evelyn de Rothschild’s Grandfather Leopold de Rothschild was invested as a Commander, Royal Victorian Order (C.V.O.) in 1902. Leopold’s brother Sir Nathan Mayer Rothschild, the Great Grandfather of Lord Jacob Rothschild, was invested as a Knight Grand Cross, Royal Victorian Order (G.C.V.O.), also in 1902. Leopold & Nathan Mayer’s parents were Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild and Charlotte de Rothschild. Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild was senior partner of NM Rothschild and Sons in 1836.

** Leopold de Rothschild

** Sir Nathan Mayer de Rothschild, 1st Baron Rothschild

** Baron Lionel Nathan de Rothschild

Lionel Nathan’s father was – confusingly – another Nathan Mayer & the son of Mayer Amschel. This Nathan Mayer was the ancestor of both Sir Evelyn & Lord Jacob. His brother (another of the original (in)famous five sons of Mayer Amschel) Jame Mayer was the ancestor of David René de Rothschild. I will note here that at the bottom of this focus on the Rothschilds I have selected some career & business-related information from Wikipedia to get some up-to-date, mainstream information on the prominent Rothschilds to use as a quick comparison of one family member with another & for comparing with more conspiracy-orientated material. Now for some bankers information more directly related to the American side of things, note that US financial magnate J.P. Morgan (who escaped death by not going on the Titanic that he was booked to travel on) died appropriately enough in Rome & was a Knight of the Papal-loyal House of Savoy’s Order of Sts Maurice & Lazarus:

** J.P. Morgan

** Order of Saints Maurice and Lazarus

And of course, from 1918 J.P. Morgan, Jr’s lawyer & frontman Elihu Root headed the club that became the Council on Foreign Relations in 1921, which Root was a leading member of & it is of course no surprise that J.P. Morgan’s Chief Counsel was the first C.F.R. President:

** Morgan and Rockefeller involvement

** Download Book – The Vatican Billions For Free

** Excerpt From “Does the Vatican Hold Your Mortgage?” by William Thomas

The Fed gets its orders from the Queen Mum of All Banks, the Bank of England – aka, the Bank of Rothschild. Considered by many to be the world’s most powerful institution – the power behind all presidencies, dictatorships and thrones – does the Bank of England answer to any other bank? Well, yes, actually. The Bank of Rome began opening branch offices in Venice in 1587. Bank of Rome = Vatican Bank controlled by the Jesuit General, aka the “Black” (hidden, shadowy) Pope. The Jesuit’s Bank of Rome opened its Bank of England branch in 1694. The first bank to be named after a country, the Bank of England had nothing to do with the British government – except to own it through privately held, interest-compounded debt. Unaccountable to either the Queen or Parliament, the misleadingly labeled “Bank of England” finances the throne, the British prime minister, parliament and much of the planet out of “The City” located in central London. All major British banks have their main offices in this “Square Mile” – as well as 70 U.S. banks. Throw in the London Stock Exchange, Lloyd’s of London, the Baltic Exchange (shipping), Fleet Street (publishing and newspapers), the London Commodity and Metal exchanges – and you are looking at Earth’s financial axis. (Descent into Slavery) The City operates as a sovereign state, just like the Vatican. Since 1820, the Rothschilds have traditionally chosen The City’s Lord Mayor. Back in the USA, as author Eric Phelps explained in an interview just before publication of his secrecy-shredding Vatican Assassins, (which was held up to include corrections by sympathetic Jesuits) – the Vatican’s Black Robes “own and control” the Federal Reserve Bank “by proxy, through the Knights of Malta, with their various trusts and so on. They never own anything outright; they always own it through a trusted third party.” … “All roads do lead to Rome … We have the Federal Reserve begat by the Bank of England begat by the Bank of Rome. Similarly, the Bank of Canada is an offspring of the Bank of England, which in turn is a child of the Bank of Rome – aka, the Vatican Bank. And the Vatican, as everyone “knows” is run by the CNN-featured “White” Pope. Left untranslated is the coronation moment when the new Pontiff is told in Latin: “Take thou the tiara adorned with the triple crown, and know that thou art the father of princes and kings, and art the governor of the world.” [Vatican Assassins] … According to Baron Avro Manhattan, author of a jaw-dropping series of Vatican books, “Many historians and researchers and one American Congressman stated that: ‘The Vatican through the Jesuit Order controlling the Illuminati is in control of the United States Federal Reserve.’” (Vatican Billions by Avro Manhattan)** Check

“It is absolutely necessary for the salvation of every human creature to be subject to the Roman Pontiff.” -Pope Boniface, Unam Sanctam (1302) … we’re beginning to see how more than 150 years ago, the General of a subversive military power called the Jesuits could brag to Duke de Brissac, “From this room, your grace, I govern not only Paris, but China – not only China, but the whole world – and all without any one knowing how it is done.” (Constitution of the Jesuits 1843) National and personal sovereignty haven’t improved much since. As Baron Avro Manhattan put it, the Pope “doesn’t have to pray for divine intervention to operate the levers of economic power – he merely has to give instructions to his officials in the Vatican Bank. Only the pope and a couple of top bank officers know precise details of its operations… This secrecy is one of the main reasons why few people know that the papacy directs one of the world’s major financial corporations.” The Vatican likes to point out that it’s going broke running Vatican City. But Cardinal Edmund Szoka, the Vatican’s unofficial finance minister, told Money Week that the Vatican’s assets total some $5 billion. Vatican City “has a separate financial statement,” he added. According to Baron Manhattan’s research: “The Vatican has large investments with the Rothschilds of Britain, France and America, with the Hambros Bank, with the Credit Suisse in London and Zurich. In the United States it has large investments with the Morgan Bank, the Chase-Manhattan Bank, the First National Bank of New York, the Bankers Trust Company, and others. The Vatican has billions of shares in the most powerful international corporations such as Gulf Oil, Shell, General Motors, Bethlehem Steel, General Electric, International Business Machines, T.W.A., etc. ” A nationally syndicated Catholic priest has stated, “The Catholic Church must be the biggest corporation in the United States. We have a branch office in every neighborhood. Our assets and real estate holdings must exceed those of Standard Oil, A.T.&T., and U.S. Steel combined. And our roster of dues-paying members must be second only to the tax rolls of the United States Government.” (The Vatican Billions) “But this is just a small portion of the wealth of the Vatican, which in the U.S. alone, is greater than that of the five wealthiest giant corporations of the country,” Baron Manhattan explains. “The Catholic church is the biggest financial power, wealth accumulator and property owner in existence.” (Vatican Billions) Don’t forget to throw in more than 18,000 works of art. (Fortune Dec 21/87) The Vatican’s gold treasure alone has been estimated by the United Nations World Magazine to amount to several billion dollars. The Independent has independently confirmed that “the Vatican Bank – Istituto per le Opere di Religione – manages more than $4 billion in assets. It does not reveal its profits or dividends, which are paid directly to the Pope. It enjoys the status of a central bank and has a dealing room adorned with crucifixes and papal portraits where 20 traders work .” (Independent Apr 19/02) …

Quote: Early in the 19th century the Pope approached the Rothschilds to borrow money. The Rothschilds were very friendly with the Pope, causing one journalist to sarcastically say “Rothschild has kissed the hand of the Pope. . . Order has at last been re-established”
Derek Wilson: ”Rothschild: The Wealth and Power of a Dynasty”, p. 101

** Check

Quote:
“Carl Mayer (Kalman) Rothschild (*1788-†1855, Oesterreich) (Not to be confused with his son Mayer Carl referenced below)He even granted Pope Gregory XVI cash injections and was received on January the 10th 1832 in audience, the kiss on the hand allowed and the Order of Saint George awarded.” [Possibly a medal from the Sacred Military Constantinian Order of Saint George. See:

** Sacred Military Constantinian Order of Saint George

“Baron Carl Mayer de Rothschild was born in 1788. … He is the son of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and Gutle Schnapper. … He was the founder of the Naples branch of Rothschilds, which after the unification of Italy returned to Frankfurt. He lived at Naples, Italy.”

** Baron Carl Mayer de Rothschild

Also See:

** Carl Mayer von Rothschild

Amschel Mayer Rothschild
(Not to be confused with his father Mayer Amschel referenced below )

“Amschel Mayer Rothschild was born in 1773. He was the son of Mayer Amschel Rothschild and Gutle Schnapper. He died in 1855. … He continued the family business at Frankfurt. He was created Baron Rothschild (Austrian Empire) on 29 September 1822. On his death, his business eventually passed into the hands of the Naples Rothschilds.”

** Amschel Mayer Rothschild (1)

** Amschel Mayer Rothschild (2)

Wears a (Order of Malta, Order of St John, Johanniterorden) Maltese cross. After all Amschel Mayer was the first son of the old Rothschild, Mayer Amschel, and took over the head office in Frankfurt.

Baron Mayer Carl de Rothschild (Not to be confused with his father Carl Mayer referenced above) Baron Mayer Carl Rothschild was born in 1820. He is the son of Baron Carl Mayer de Rothschild and Adelheid Hertz. … Baron Mayer Carl Rothschild lived at Naples, Italy. He lived at Frankfurt-am-Main, Hessen, Germany.”

** Baron Mayer Carl RothschildOnly the decoration to the left (the gentleman in the photo’s right ) could be Jewish – the others rather not. Star of the Knight Grand Cross of the British Empire, above the Order of Malta or Order of St John’s Maltese Cross, I believe. The source of this photo appears to be:

** Check

Thus, if the gentleman in the photo above is Baron Mayer Carl Rothschild – as appears to be the case, as referenced at the above academic site – then it is most interesting & curious that this Italian & German-based Rothschild was honoured by the British Monarch, assuming that my identification of the 8-pointed star is correct.

Mayer RothschildBelow seems to be dangling a Christian (ostensibly Christian, in fact Pagan Romanist ) cross
Not to be confused with his son Amschel Mayer referenced above. “Mayer Amschel Rothschild was born on 23 February 1743/44. He was the son of Amschel Moses Rothschild and Schönche Lechnich. … Mayer Amschel Rothschild was an Imperial (Holy Roman Empire) Crown Agent in 1800.”
** Check (1)

** Check (2)

Focusing on the more prominent Rothschilds, here’s a selection of career-related information from Wikipedia:

Jacob Rothschild, 4th Baron Rothschild:
** Check

“He is a shareholder in Rothschild Continuation Holdings, the Swiss-based holding company for the Rothschild interests which has positions in many of the family businesses, including the bank N M Rothschild & Sons. After resigning from the bank, Jacob Rothschild went on to found J. Rothschild Assurance Group (now St. James’s Place) with Sir Mark Weinberg in 1991. In 1989, he joined forces with Sir James Goldsmith and Kerry Packer, in an unsuccessful bid for British American Tobacco. His main business interests now are RIT Capital Partners plc, an investment trust company with net assets under management of £1700m (Aug 2008), of which he is Chairman, Spencer House Capital Management LLP founded with Richard Horlick (formerly CIO of Schroders), and Spencer House Partners, a “mini merchant bank” headed by Rothschild and Ronald Cohen of Apax Partners. He also retains many other venture capital and property interests. On 17 November 2003, he took up his post as deputy chairman of BSkyB. From his headquarters in St James’s Place in London, Jacob Rothschild has cultivated an influential set of clients, business associates and friends who have extended his interests far beyond the normal scope of a banker. He was a close personal friend of Diana, Princess of Wales and maintains strong personal and business links with Henry Kissinger. His country estate has been a regular venue for visiting heads of state including Presidents Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton. Margaret Thatcher received French President François Mitterrand there at a summit in 1990. He hosted the European Economic Round Table conference in 2002, attended by such figures as James Wolfensohn, former president of the World Bank, Nicky Oppenheimer, Warren Buffett and Arnold Schwarzenegger.In 2003 Rothschild came under scrutiny when Russian oil industrialist Mikhail Khodorkovsky’s shares in YUKOS passed to him under a deal they concluded prior to Khodorkovsky’s arrest.”

Nat Rothschild:
** Check

“Rothschild began his career in 1994 at Lazard Brothers Asset Management in London, before joining Gleacher Partners, the New York-based mergers and acquisitions (M&A) advisory firm founded by Eric Gleacher, former head of M&A at Morgan Stanley and Lehman Brothers. Rothschild is the co-chairman of Atticus Capital LP, an international investment management firm established in 1995, that has offices in New York and London. He is also a director of RIT Capital Partners plc, and a director of The Rothschild Foundation. In 2006, he was appointed chairman of Trigranit, a Hungarian developer of which he is a major shareholder. Rothschild is a member of the Belfer Center’s International Council at Harvard’s John F. Kennedy School of Government and the International Advisory Council of the Brookings Institution. He is also a member of the International Advisory Board of the Barrick Gold Corporation. He was nominated as a “Young Global Leader” by the World Economic Forum in 2005.”

Evelyn de Rothschild:
** Check

“In 1968, Evelyn de Rothschild was appointed a director of Paris-based de Rothschild Frères while Guy de Rothschild from the French branch of the family became a partner at N M Rothschild & Sons. In 1976 he took over as bank chairman from Victor Rothschild and in 1982 became chairman of Rothschilds Continuation Holdings AG, the co-ordinating company for the merchant banking group. He became co-chairman of Rothschild Bank A.G., Zurich in 1994, serving until 2003 when he oversaw the merger of the family’s French and UK houses. David René de Rothschild of the French branch took over as executive chairman of Rothschild International after the different branches had been merged and Sir Evelyn continued as non-executive chairman of N M Rothschild & Sons. In 2003, he founded with his wife, Lynn Forester de Rothschild, a holding company, E.L. Rothschild, to manage their investments in The Economist and various enterprises in India.Throughout his career, Evelyn de Rothschild has been actively involved in a number of other organisations in both the private and public sectors and has held the following business positions:
* Chairman – The Economist (1972-1989)
* Chairman – British Merchant Banking & Securities House Association (1985-1989)
* Deputy Chairman – Milton Keynes Development Corporation (1971-1984)
* Chairman – United Racecourses (1977-1994)
* Director – De Beers Consolidated Mines (1977-1994)
* Director – IBM United Kingdom Holdings Limited (1972-1995)
Evelyn de Rothschild also served as a Director of the newspaper group owned by Lord Beaverbrook. Years later, he served for a time as a Director of Lord Black’s Daily Telegraph newspaper and was a member of the Hollinger International Advisory Board. An owner of thoroughbred racehorses, he is a former chairman of United Racecourses, which owns Epsom Downs and Sandown Park racecourses. In 1989 he was knighted by HM Queen Elizabeth II. He has been a Governor of the London School of Economics and Political Science as well as an active patron of the arts and supporter of a number of charities. He served as Chairman of the Delegacy of St Mary’s Hospital Medical School from 1977 to 1988. He has been a Member of the Council of the Royal Academy of Dramatic Art, a trustee of the Shakespeare Globe Trust, and in 1998 was appointed Chairman of the Princess Royal Trust for Carers. Sir Evelyn was the founding chairman of the 1990 European Association for Banking and Financial History e.V. in Frankfurt, Germany, a position he held until retiring in 2004.”

David Mayer de Rothschild:
** Check

“Neither he nor his brother have shown interest in joining the family-owned N M Rothschild & Sons London banking business and when their father stepped down as chairman in 2003, cousin David René de Rothschild of the French branch of the family took over as head of the worldwide Rothschild Group.” The most active & prominent living Rothschild in the business world today is:

David René James de Rothschild:
** Check
“… born in 1942. He is the son of Guy Edouard Alphonse Paul de Rothschild and Alix Hermine Jeanette Schey von Koromla. He married Princess Olimpia Anna Aldobrandini in 1974. David René James de Rothschild was head of NM Rothschild, London in 2003.”

** Check

“David de Rothschild was educated at Institut d’Études Politiques de Paris in Paris from which he graduated in 1966. He began his business career at Société miniére et métallurgique de Peñarroya, one of the family’s international mining businesses headquartered in Paris. He then began training in de Rothschild Frères bank. French government reform of banking regulations ended the legal distinction between banques d’affaires and deposit banks and in 1967 de Rothschild Frères became Banque Rothschild, a limited-liability company. David de Rothschild’s father was an aggressive businessman who strove to expand the bank and their investments in mining and oil exploration as chairman of Imetal S.A.. However, the family fortunes suffered a severe setback following the election to the French Presidency of the socialist government of François Mitterrand in 1981. The new parliament nationalized a number of large companies and banks including that of the Rothschild family. An angry and discouraged 72-year-old Guy de Rothschild left France for a time and settled in New York City where the family had existing but limited business activities. In an October 18, 2003 interview with George Trefgarne published in the The Spectator, David de Rothschild said that after nationalisation it took until 1986, when the Socialists lost power, for Rothschild family members to get a new banking license. In 1987 a successor company called Rothschild & Cie Banque was created by David de Rothschild who was joined by his half-brother Edouard and cousin Eric de Rothschild. Capitalized at only $1 million and starting with just three employees, they soon built their tiny investment bank into a major competitor in France and continental Europe. In 2003, following the retirement of Sir Evelyn de Rothschild as head of N M Rothschild & Sons of London, the English and French firms merged to become one umbrella entity called “Group Rothschild.” Ownership was shared equally between the French and English branches of the family under the leadership of David de Rothschild. In 2007, the English branch sold their share to the French branch. The French branch now fully own N M Rothschild & Sons. As of 2008, David de Rothschild holds the following corporate positions:
* Chairman of N M Rothschild & Sons
* Chairman of Rothschilds Continuation Holdings
* Vice Chairman of Rothschild Bank AG
* Vice Chairman of the Supervisory Board of Paris Orleans
* Senior Partner of Rothschild & Cie Banque
* Member of the Supervisory Board of Compagnie Financiere Saint-Honore
* Member of the Supervisory Board of Compagnie Financiere Martin Maurel
* Member of the Supervisory Board of De Beers Group
* Member of the Supervisory Board of Groupe Casino
David de Rothschild also owns a share of the Château Lafite-Rothschild vineyard but is not active in the day to day operations.”

And we shall also note:
Benjamin Edmond Maurice de Rothschild

** Check
“… born in 1963. He is the son of Edmond Adolphe Maurice Jules Jacques de Rothschild and Nadine Nelly Jeannette L’Hopitalier. Benjamin Edmond Maurice de Rothschild was head of the Compagnie Financière Edmond de Rothschild. In 2001 he launched e-Rothschild (an online bank).”

The Hofjuden Court Jews have been serving Caesar for centuries

June 23, 2014

“It Is Simply Amazing!”

By Darryl Eberhart, Editor of “Tackling the Tough Topics (TTT)”
June 28, 2006 (Updated through: October 20, 2007) (www.toughissues.org)

What I am about to tell you is “simply amazing!” A sizable portion of the”alternative media” tells us that “the Jews” (i.e., “the [Masonic-Zionist] Jews”) RUN the New World Order, to include banking, the current U.S. administration, the U.S. Congress, Hollywood, and the mainstream media. Well, let’s first just discuss Hollywood and the mainstream media. For if the Masonic-Zionist Jews do indeed CONTROL Hollywood and the mainstream media, then I am very confused. You may be asking: “Why are you confused?”

I am glad you asked.

Dear reader, the greatest murderer of Jews over the past 1000 plus years has been the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH. The ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH has also been the biggest murderer of independent Christian groups (e.g., the Albigensian and Waldensian Christians) – the biggest murderer of Protestants (e.g., French Huguenots, Irish Protestants, and Bohemian Protestants) – and one of the biggest murderers of Orthodox Christians (e.g., the genocide carried out against Serb Orthodox Christians in ROMAN CATHOLIC-controlled Fascist Croatia in the 1940s). If the mainstream media and Hollywood are run by
Masonic-Zionist Jews, then WHY aren’t they exposing the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH’S extensive support of Fascist states that slaughtered Jews in Europe during World War II?

First, let’s examine just a small portion of the well-documented history of ROMAN CATHOLIC mass murder of Jews. Please consider the following quotations:

“Jews were slaughtered by the thousands all across Europe as the [ROMAN] CATHOLIC Crusaders made their way to the ‘Holy Land’ to recover it from both Jews and Turks for the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH.” – Dave Hunt (“A Cup of Trembling”; 1995; Page 159)

“One of history’s most malevolent persons died on this day [September 16] in 1498. Tomas de Torquemada, as [ROMAN CATHOLIC] Inquisitor General of Spain, ordered more than 10,000 people to be burned at the stake because they didn’t agree with his religious views. He used the Inquisition for religious and political reasons, believing punishment of [Ed. Note: so-called] ‘heretics’ and non-Christians – chiefly Jews and Muslims – was the only way to achieve political unity in Spain. Greatly feared and hated by millions, he persuaded [Spanish King] Ferdinand and [Queen] Isabella to rid Spain of Jews. More than a MILLION families were driven from Spain during that time. The country never recovered from the resulting decline.” – Ron Hembree (“A Daily Joy”; Page 272)

“.[ROMAN] CATHOLIC priest, [Monsignor] Fr. Jozef Tiso, ruler of Slovakia’s Nazi puppet regime of 1939-45.sent that tiny country’s Jewish population of 70,000 to the extermination camps in Poland.” – Dave Hunt (“A Cup of Trembling”; 1995; Page 191)

“To a Jew, Hitler and [Italian Fascist dictator] Mussolini were ‘Christians’. In fact, they were ROMAN CATHOLICS from birth, and in spite of their horrendous crimes against humanity they were never excommunicated from their Church. The same was true of [Nazi SS Chief Heinrich] Himmler and many others in the Nazi hierarchy. Indeed, the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH has a long history of persecution, expulsion, and slaughter of Jews, to which Hitler referred in justifying the Holocaust.” – Dave Hunt (“A Cup of Trembling”; 1995; Page 158)

Here is some of that historical record of ROMAN CATHOLIC slaughter of Jews:

(1) 1095 A.D. – Pope Urban II (pope: 1088-1099) proclaims the First Crusade. Here is what historian Will Durant has written concerning this PAPACY-instigated murder spree: “When in 1095, Pope Urban II proclaimed the First Crusade, some Christians [i.e., ROMAN CATHOLICS] thought it desirable to kill the Jews in Europe before proceeding so far to fight Turks in Jerusalem. Godfrey of Bouillon, having accepted the leadership of the crusade, announced that he would avenge the blood of Jesus upon the Jews.leaving not one of them alive; and his companions proclaimed their intention to kill all Jews who would not accept Christianity [Ed. Note:
i.e., the ROMAN CATHOLIC version of it].”

(2) 1096 A.D. – ROMAN CATHOLIC Crusaders slaughter half the Jews of Worms, Germany on their way through that town.

(3) 1099 A.D. – ROMAN CATHOLIC Crusaders, sent on a “holy” mission by the pope of Rome [i.e., Pope Urban II], make it to the walls of Jerusalem. Upon capturing the city, the Crusaders herd the Jews into the synagogue, and then set it on fire. These ROMAN CATHOLIC Crusaders butcher almost all of the city’s inhabitants – men, women, and children – Jews, Moslems, and probably even a few Christians! (The ROMAN CATHOLIC Crusaders had earlier slaughtered the inhabitants of the city of Antioch [in southern Turkey] – men, women, and children – when they had captured it!)

(4) 1236 A.D. – ROMAN CATHOLIC Crusaders slaughter Jews in the Anjou and Poitou regions of western France. Historian Will Durant tells us: “[ROMAN CATHOLIC Crusaders] invaded the Jewish settlements of Anjou and Poitou. .[These ROMAN CATHOLIC Crusaders] bade all Jews be baptized; when the Jews refused, the [ROMAN CATHOLIC] Crusaders trampled 3000 of them to death under their horses’ hoofs.”

(5) 1243 A.D. – All Jews in Belitz, Germany (near Berlin) are burned alive by ROMAN CATHOLICS. According to historian Will Durant, their alleged crime was that “some of them had defiled a consecrated host”.

(6) 1298 A.D. – All Jews in Rottingen are burned to death by ROMAN CATHOLICS. According to historian Will Durant, their alleged crime was:”desecrating a sacramental wafer”.

(7) 14th century (1300s) – The ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH blames the Jews for the”Black Death” (probably the bubonic plague). Here is what author Dave Hunt has written in his book, “A Woman Rides the Beast” (1994), concerning this time in history: “From the time the popes ruled Rome, the Jews’ plight.was far more grievous than it had ever been at the hands of the pagan rulers.

Pagans had blamed every disaster upon Christians. Now the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH blamed all on the Jews. Accused of causing the ‘Black Death’, Jews were rounded up and hanged, burned, and drowned by the thousands in revenge.” (Page 267)

(8) 1481 A.D. – Kickoff of the “Spanish Inquisition”. The hierarchy of the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH choreographs an orgy of torture and burning people alive – called the Inquisition. Though it is aimed initially and primarily at Jews and Moslems, the Inquisition also targets those Christians whose beliefs are not completely in line with the Roman Catholic Church’s doctrines and practices. In the first two years (1481-1483), at least 2000 individuals are burned alive. Author Dave Hunt, in his book “A Woman Rides the Beast” (1994), states: “.In Spain alone the number of condemned exceeded three MILLION, with about 300,000 burned at the stake [during the length of the Spanish Inquisition].” (Page 79; Hunt quoting from R.W. Thompson’s book”The Papacy and the Civil Power”)

(9) 1941-1945 A.D. – The Jewish holocaust occurs in Nazi-Fascist-controlled Europe. Up to six MILLION Jews are murdered and starved to death. ROMAN CATHOLIC involvement in this holocaust is extensive. Roman Catholic German Knight of Malta Franz von Papen is one of the top players involved in putting Adolf Hitler into power. The German ROMAN CATHOLIC Center Party’s endorsement of, and unanimous vote for, the “Enabling Act” of March 1933 is crucial, giving Adolf Hitler the 2/3s majority he needs to assume dictatorial powers in Germany. JESUIT “father” Himmler (uncle to Heinrich Himmler) is a top officer in the Nazi SS (which is admittedly modeled after the JESUIT ORDER).

A number of ROMAN CATHOLIC priests put on the black uniforms of the Nazi SS. The VATICAN signs Concordats with Nazi Germany and with Fascist Italy. ROMAN CATHOLICS are installed as puppet dictators in a number of Fascist countries. For example, in Slovakia, the JESUIT priest, Monsignor Tiso, is installed as dictator. Additionally, Roman Catholic Knights of Malta head up three powerful intelligence agencies during World War II (William Donovan heads the American OSS – which later becomes the CIA; German General Reinhard Gehlen heads Nazi Intelligence on the eastern front; and Russian Anton Turkul heads Soviet Intelligence, and uses Jesuit priests for his couriers). By using elements within the warring factions, the VATICAN is able to ensure the slaughter of large numbers of its favorite targets: Jews, Protestants (in northern Germany and in Prussia), and Orthodox Christians. At the end of the war, the VATICAN helps many Nazi and Fascist war criminals to escape via the “Vatican Ratlines”, hiding them in convents and monasteries in Europe until they can safely escape to such countries as the USA, Argentina, etc.

(10) 1941-1945 A.D. – The “VATICAN’S holocaust” occurs in Croatia. Though primarily directed against Serb Orthodox Christians, much smaller numbers of Jews and gypsies are also targeted. This monstrous, barbaric, and savage religious genocide is planned, orchestrated, and conducted by ROMAN CATHOLIC clergymen – mainly FRANCISCAN monks, friars, and priests, along with several high-ranking JESUITS. Roman Catholic Croatian Fuehrer Ante Pavelic teams up with high-ranking ROMAN CATHOLIC prelates, such as JESUIT Monsignor Aloysius Stepinac (Archbishop of Zagreb) and JESUIT Monsignor Ivan Saric (Archbishop of Sarajevo), to use ROMAN CATHOLIC Ustashi military units to torture and butcher from 600,000 to 1 MILLION innocent Serb Orthodox Christian men, women, elderly, and children. This religious genocide includes the most brutal forms of torture, forced conversions, burning people alive, raping and murdering girls and women, impaling young children alive on stakes, gouging out the eyes of victims to make necklaces, starving children to death, burying victims alive, crucifying Orthodox priests to wooden doors, and some other atrocities that I do not feel should be written in an article. ROMAN CATHOLIC clergymen not only frequently advise the Roman Catholic Ustashi military units on how to torture and murder, but also actually participate in the savagery. A Franciscan monk, by name of “father” Miroslav Filipovic, serves as the cruel camp commandant at Jasenovac (one of the worst of the concentration camps).

NOTE: The above historical items were taken from my TTT newsletter entitled”Bloody Hands & Wicked Hearts” that is posted on http://www.toughissues.org.

The ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH has for many decades tried to “WHITEWASH” her involvement in agitating, inspiring, and actually orchestrating and leading, the persecution and slaughter of Jews throughout history, and especially her involvement in such atrocities during World War II. Please consider the following quote by author Dave Hunt, in which he analyzes the Roman Catholic Church’s modern “condemnation” of “anti-Semitism” from the Vatican II Council:

“Nothing could be more hypocritical than this statement [by the Roman Catholic Church’s Vatican II Council condemning “anti-Semitism”]. The [Roman Catholic] Church strongly condemns ‘hatreds, persecutions.anti-Semitism’, but only by others, not by herself. No mention is made of the fact that during the many centuries when the [ROMAN] CATHOLIC CHURCH held sway over society, ruling even kings and emperors, she was the inspirer and perpetrator of an anti-Jewish bias as bad as anything the world has ever seen.” (“A Cup of Trembling”; 1995; Page 165)

Indeed, ROMAN CATHOLIC involvement in helping to foment World War II (WWII), and then supporting ROMAN CATHOLIC-controlled Fascist regimes in Europe during that time, has been well documented. Please carefully consider the following quotations that show ROMAN CATHOLIC involvement “to the maximum” in WWII – involvement that resulted in the deaths of MILLIONS of both Jews and Christians:

“The public is practically unaware of the overwhelming responsibility carried by the VATICAN and its JESUITS in the starting of two world wars – a situation which may be explained in part by the gigantic finances at the disposition of the VATICAN and its JESUITS, giving them power in so many spheres, especially since the last conflict.” – Edmond Paris (“The Secret History of the Jesuits”; 1975; Page 9)

“The JESUITS, in control of [Adolf] Hitler’s occultic and homosexual Third Reich. installed puppet dictators throughout Europe. They were:
(1) Bavarian Germany and the Third Reich – [Adolf] Hitler [born-died:
1889-1945]
(2) Italy – [Benito] Mussolini [born-died: 1883-1945]
(3) ‘Vichy’ France – [Henri Philippe] Petain [born-died: 1856-1951]
(4) Spain – [Francisco] Franco [born-died: 1892-1975]
(5) Austria – Seyss-Inquart
(6) Poland – Frank
(7) Slovakia – [Jesuit] Priest [Monsignor] Tiso
(8) Croatia – [Ante] Pavelitch (Ed. Note: alternate spelling: Pavelic)
(9) Belgium – Degrelle.

All these ROMAN CATHOLIC, JESUIT-controlled, Jew-hating dictators were loyal to the greatest war criminal of all, Papal Caesar Pius XII and his master, JESUIT [Superior] General Wlodimir Ledochowski.” – Eric Jon Phelps (“Vatican Assassins”; 2001; Page 478)

“The [Nazi] Third Reich is the first power which not only recognizes, but which puts into practice the high principles of the PAPACY.” – Franz von Papen (German Roman Catholic Knight of Malta; January 14, 1934)

“The [ROMAN CATHOLIC] priests and the faithful must unhesitatingly uphold the great German state [i.e., Nazi Germany], and the Fuehrer [i.e., Adolf Hitler] whose struggle to set up [Nazi] Germany’s power, honor and prosperity is in accord with the wishes of Providence [i.e., the VATICAN].” – JESUIT Roman Catholic Cardinal Innitzer (Archbishop of Vienna, Austria)

“The declaration of [ROMAN CATHOLIC JESUIT] Monseigneur [Ed. Note: French spelling of “Monsignor”] Tiso, chief of the Slovakian state, stating his intention to build up Slovakia according to a Christian [sic] plan, has the full approval of the Holy See [i.e., the PAPACY].” – Radio Vatican (June 1940)

“I have learnt most of all from the JESUIT ORDER. .So far, there has been nothing more imposing on earth than the hierarchical organization of the [ROMAN] CATHOLIC CHURCH. A good part of that organization I have transported direct to my own [Nazi] party. .The [ROMAN] CATHOLIC CHURCH must be held up as an example. .I will tell you a secret. I am founding an order [Ed. Note: the Nazi SS]. .In [Heinrich] Himmler [who would become head of the Nazi SS]

I see our Ignatius de Loyola [Ed. Note: the founder of the Jesuit Order].” – Adolf Hitler (1889-1945; Roman Catholic Nazi leader of Germany from 1933-1945)

((Ed. Comment to the preceding quote: This quotation of Hitler was taken from Edmond Paris’ book “The Vatican Against Europe”; 1959; Pages 252, 256.))

“The [ROMAN] CATHOLIC priests [in Fascist Croatia in the 1940s] changed their robes for the uniforms of the dreaded [ROMAN CATHOLIC] Ustashi [militia – and later the army] killer squads, and led the most barbaric, brutal raids upon those [Serb Orthodox Christian] people, and practiced satanic torture never before known in this century. We are not talking about 800 years ago. We are talking 1940.” – Jack Chick (“Smokescreens”; 1983; Page 25)

“This [Ed. Note: her booklet “Ravening Wolves”] is the record of torture and murder committed in Europe in 1941-1945 by an army of [ROMAN] CATHOLIC Actionists known as the Ustashi, led by monks and priests, and even participated in by nuns.” – Monica Farrell (“Ravening Wolves”)

“Most of [Fascist] Croatia’s [ROMAN] CATHOLIC clergy were fanatically behind [Croatian “supreme leader” Ante] Pavelic and his unbelievably evil regime. Medals were even given by Pavelic to nuns and priests, thus betraying the fact that many of them played active roles alongside the Ustashi military. FRANCISCAN monks in particular joined Ustashi battalions.”
– Dave Hunt (“A Woman Rides the Beast”; 1994; Page 301)

“[ROMAN] CATHOLIC religious orders gave total and continuous support to the [ROMAN CATHOLIC] Ustashi [militia – and later the army]. Before the establishment of the Independent State of Croatia (1941) their convents were hiding places for the Ustashi terrorists, [where they] concealed Ustashi presses, and were depositories of Ustashi subversive literature and even of hand grenades, guns and dynamite.
The Ustashi carried out their [pre-World War II terrorist] activities screened by members of [ROMAN CATHOLIC] religious orders, male and female.

Nuns prepared uniforms, emblems and medical equipment for Ustashi detachments.” – Avro Manhattan (“The Vatican’s Holocaust”; 1986; Page 99)

“Once [Croatian “supreme leader” Ante] Pavelic took power, [JESUIT] Archbishop [Aloysius] Stepinac issued a Pastoral Letter ordering the Croatian clergy to support the new Ustasha State. The involvement of [ROMAN] CATHOLIC clergy either in active participation or in blessing the Ustashi-run holocaust is well documented. One Franciscan monk, Miroslav Filipovic, headed the Jasenovac concentration camp for two years, during which time he directed the extermination of no less than 100,000 victims, mostly Serbian Orthodox. [JESUIT] Archbishop Stepinac headed the committee which was responsible for forcible ‘conversions’ to Roman Catholicism under threat of death – and was also the Supreme Military Apostolic Vicar of the Ustashi Army, which effected the slaughter of those who failed to convert [to Roman Catholicism]. [JESUIT Archbishop] Stepinac was known as the ‘father-confessor’ to the Ustashi, and continually bestowed the blessing of Holy Mother Church upon its members and actions.” – Dave Hunt (“A Woman Rides the Beast”; 1994; Page 302)

“Estimates of the number of victims [of the VATICAN’S Holocaust in Croatia in the 1940s] exceed a MILLION. This is probably a realistic figure. Yugoslavia in its war crimes trials estimated that from 700,000 to 900,000 victims were ‘tortured and put to death.[in] the two dozen concentration camps’ within Croatia, and tens of thousands never reached the camps. Many were Jews, but most were Serbians of Orthodox faith who were give the choice of conversion to Roman Catholicism or death.

Both in Yugoslavia and the Ukraine, ROMAN CATHOLIC priests, bishops, and cardinals, with the full knowledge of the VATICAN, participated in and gave their blessing to some of the bloodiest and most barbaric massacres of the war, aimed at giving ROMAN CATHOLICISM control of these regions.” – Dave Hunt (“A Woman Rides the Beast”; 1994; Pages 303, 304)

“.By a ‘providential’ synchronism, when [Italian dictator] Mussolini seized power in Italy thanks to don Sturzo, [who was a] JESUIT and chief of the CATHOLIC party, [then it was at that same time that] Monseigneur Seipel, a JESUIT, became chancellor of Austria. He held that position until 1929, with an interregnum of two years, and, during those decisive years, he led the Austrian interior politics on to the reactionary and clerical road; his successors followed him on that road which led to the absorption of that country into the German block. The bloody repression of working-class uprisings earned him [i.e., JESUIT Seipel] the nickname ‘Keine Milde Kardinal’ – the ‘Cardinal without mercy’.” – Edmond Paris (“The Secret History of the Jesuits”; 1975; Page 139)

“It is believed that the Pope [i.e., Pius XI] will offer these services to Signor [Benito] Mussolini through the JESUIT Father Pietro Tachi-Venturi, who is often consulted by Mussolini on important matters.” (Daily Express, 2/9/1935) British United Press

“[Nazi SS Chief Heinrich] Himmler’s CATHOLICISM was very important to him. He attended church regularly, took Communion, confessed, and prayed.” G.S. Graber (“The History of the SS”)

“Adolf Hitler himself was a ROMAN CATHOLIC. Hitler had been reared in a traditional [Roman] Catholic family. As a child and youngster little Adolf had regularly attended Mass, had served as an acolyte during Mass, had hoped to become a priest, and had attended school in a Benedictine monastery at Lambach, Austria. .As an adult, Hitler remained a member in good standing in the ROMAN [CATHOLIC] CHURCH-STATE. At no time did officials of the [ROMAN CATHOLIC] CHURCH-STATE excommunicate him. When the German military plotted
to assassinate Hitler in 1944, and the plot failed, the ROMAN [CATHOLIC] CHURCH-STATE in Germany offered a ‘Te Deum’ to thank God for the Fuehrer’s escape.” – John W. Robbins (“Ecclesiastical Megalomania”; 1999 and 2006; Page 167)

“The SS had been organized by [Heinrich] Himmler according to the principles of the JESUIT ORDER. The rules of service and spiritual exercises prescribed by Ignatius de Loyola [Ed. Note: the founder of the Jesuit Order] constituted a model which [Heinrich] Himmler strove carefully to copy. Absolute obedience was the supreme rule; every order had to be executed without comment.” – Walter Shellenberg (Chief of the Nazi Sicherheitdienst)

((Ed. Comment to the preceding quote: ROMAN CATHOLIC priests put on the black uniforms of the Nazi SS, serving especially in the SS Central Security Service.))

“In the early days of May (1936), [German Knight of Malta Franz] von Papen entered into secret negotiations with Dr. Schussnigg (Austrian Chancellor) working on his weak point [i.e., he was a devout Roman Catholic] and showed him how advantageous a reconciliation with [Nazi leader Adolf] Hitler would be as far as the VATICAN’S interests were concerned; the argument may seem odd, but Schussnigg was very devout, and von Papen was the POPE’S [German] chamberlain [i.e., a high official in certain royal courts]. Not surprisingly, it was the [POPE’S] secret chamberlain [in Germany – i.e., Knight of Malta Franz von Papen] who led the whole affair, which ended, on the 11th of March 1938, with the resignation of the pious Schussnigg (pupil of the JESUITS), in favor of Seyss-Inquart, chief of the Austrian Nazis. The following day [March 12, 1938], the German troops entered Austria and the puppet government of Seyss-Inquart proclaimed the union of the country to the [Nazi German Third] Reich. The event was welcomed by an enthusiastic declaration of Vienna’s archbishop, Cardinal Innitzer (a JESUIT).” – Edmond Paris (“The Secret History of the Jesuits”; 1975; Page 139)

“The German author Walter Hagen gives also this discreet information: ‘The JESUITS’ [Superior] General, Count Halke von Ledochowski, was ready to organize, on the common basis of anti-communism, some collaboration between the German Secret Service and the JESUIT ORDER.’ As a result, within the SS Central Security Service, an organization was created, and most of its main posts were held by [ROMAN] CATHOLIC priests wearing the black uniform of the [Nazi] SS. The JESUIT [priest] ‘father’ Himmler [uncle of Heinrich Himmler] was one of its superior officers.” – Edmond Paris (“The Secret History of the Jesuits”; 1975; Page 168)

“.Kurt Heinrich Himmler [was] chief of the Gestapo [i.e., the secret police force of the German Nazi state], which meant he held in his hand the essential reins of power of the [Nazi] regime. Was it his personal merits which earned him such a high position? Did Hitler see in him a superior genius when he compared him [i.e., Heinrich Himmler] to the creator of the Jesuit Order [i.e., Ignatius of Loyola]? It is certainly not what the testimonies of those who knew him imply, as they saw in him nothing more than mediocrity. Was that ‘star’ [of Heinrich Himmler] shining with a borrowed ‘brightness’? Was it really Kurt Heinrich Himmler, the ostensible [i.e., apparent] chief, who actually reigned over the Gestapo and the secret services? Who was sending millions of people, deported for political reasons, and Jews to
their death? Was it the flat-faced nephew or [was it] the [JESUIT priest] uncle, the former Canon at the Court of Bavaria, one of [JESUIT Superior General] Ledochowski’s favorites, a JESUIT ‘father’ and superior officer of the [Nazi] SS?” – Edmond Paris (“The Secret History of the Jesuits”; 1975; Page 168)

“When thousands of German anti-Nazis were tortured to death in Hitler’s concentration camps, when the Polish intelligentsia was slaughtered, when hundreds of thousands of Russians died as the result of being treated as Slavic Untermenschen [subhumans], and when 6,000,000 human beings were murdered for being ‘non-Aryan’, [ROMAN] CATHOLIC CHURCH officials in Germany bolstered the [Nazi] regime perpetrating these crimes. The Pope in Rome [i.e., Pius XII], the spiritual head and supreme moral teacher of the Roman Catholic Church, remained silent. In the face of these greatest of moral depravities which mankind has been forced to witness in recent centuries, the moral teachings of a Church [allegedly] dedicated to love and charity, could be heard in no other form but vague generalities.” – Guenter Lewy (“The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany”; 1964; Page 341)

“[German] soldiers returning from the Eastern Front were telling horrible stories, how in occupied Russia Jewish civilians – men, women and children – were being lined up and machine-gunned by the thousands. .In the spring of 1942 the leaflets of the ‘White Rose’, composed by a group of students and a professor of philosophy at the University of Munich, told of the murder of 300,000 Jews in Poland and asked why the German people remained so apathetic in the face of these revolting times?” – Guenter Lewy (“The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany”; 1964; Page 287)

“This concealment [of the truth concerning ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH cooperation with the Nazi regime] has been so bold and successful that in Germany.not a single [Roman Catholic] bishop had to resign his office [because of his cooperation with the Nazis during World War II].

Quite the contrary, Bishop Berning, who had served until the downfall of Hitler in Goering’s Prussian State Council, in 1949 was given the honorary title of Archbishop. Herr [Franz] von Papen [who helped put Hitler into power and who negotiated the Concordat between the VATICAN and Nazi Germany in 1933] was made Papal Privy Chamberlain in 1959.
Such rewards for men deeply involved with the Nazi regime represent a mockery of [the true] heroic figures.who died fighting Hitler.” – Guenter Lewy (“The Catholic Church and Nazi Germany”; 1964; Page 321)

“Without the deadening hand of VATICAN control, resistance might have been multiplied across the country [i.e., Nazi Germany during World War II] from the outset. And had [ROMAN] CATHOLIC officialdom, from the outset, not turned a blind eye to the expanding anti-Semitic propaganda and persecution, the terrible disaster that befell the Jews might never have occurred.” – John Cornwell (Roman Catholic historian and journalist; “Hitler’s Pope: The Secret History of Pius XII”; 1999; Page 199)

“Practically every right-wing dictator of the period [i.e., in Europe during World War II] had been born and brought up a [ROMAN] CATHOLIC – notably Hitler, Franco, Petain, Mussolini, Pavelic, and Tiso (who was a CATHOLIC priest).” – John Cornwell (“Hitler’s Pope”; 1999; Page 280)

“Fascism is the regime that corresponds most closely to the concepts of the CHURCH OF ROME.” – Civilta Cattolica (House organ of the JESUITS)

Well, then, we seem to have a well-documented history that:

(1) The ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH has been slaughtering Jews from at least the time of the early Crusades.
(2) The ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH launched a “holy” INQUISITION that initially targeted many Jews in Spain.
(3) The ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH was heavily involved in supporting Nazi Germany and other Fascist regimes in Europe during World War II – at a time when up to 6 MILLION Jews were being exterminated by these ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH-supported murdering regimes!

Let us remember that much of the “alternative media” tells us that the
“Masonic-Zionist Jews” are running the New World Order! Much of the “alternative media” also tells us that these Masonic-Zionist Jews are running Hollywood and the mainstream media. If these Masonic-Zionist Jews are really running Hollywood and the mainstream media, then why in blazes aren’t CNN, Fox, ABC, NBC, and CBS telling us the whole story about ROMAN CATHOLIC heavy-duty involvement in fomenting World War II (WWII), helping to bring Hitler to power, filling key positions in the Nazi SS, supporting numerous Fascist regimes in Europe during WWII, orchestrating the “VATICAN’S Holocaust” in Croatia, and helping Fascist war criminals escape at the end of WWII via the VATICAN Ratlines? Why isn’t Hollywood producing numerous movies to show us all these facts that tie the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH directly into brutal genocide against Jews and Christians in Europe during WWII? After all, we’ve seen from the numerous quotations in this article that the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH has been the greatest enemy the Jews have ever seen – especially in the past 1000 plus years! Again I must ask: “If the ‘Masonic-Zionist Jews’ are controlling the mainstream media and Hollywood in America, then why in blazes aren’t they exposing this greatest enemy of the Jews, i.e., the ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH? WHY? WHY? WHY?

Let me tell you “WHY” this isn’t happening: It is because the”Masonic-Zionist Jews” are NOT “in charge”. Oh, yes, they hold some mid-level “management positions” within the New World Order (to include some
positions inside Hollywood and America’s mainstream media), and even a couple high-level “management positions”. However, they are NOT the “top player” in the New World Order. The real “controllers” (who operate “in the shadows” and “behind the scenes”) are the “secret societies”, such as the JESUIT ORDER, its Knights of Malta, and the top levels of JESUIT-controlled Freemasonry. (They direct and “steer” the mid-level managers.) Some folks in the “alternative media” love to point out that the Jewish B’nai B’rith is a Masonic organization, and it indeed is. But, WHO runs Freemasonry? Please consider the following quotes:

“.If you trace up Masonry, through all its Orders, till you come to the grand tip-top, head Mason of the World, you will discover that the dread individual and the Chief of the Society of Jesus [i.e., the BLACK POPE – the Superior General of the JESUIT ORDER] are one and the same person.” – James Parton (American historian)

“This inner and invisible Freemasonry is international in extent, and it is within the Inner Circle that the JESUITS conceal themselves, work, and mastermind the projects that suit their goals.” – John Daniel (“The Grand Design Exposed”; 1999; Page 170)

“Without exception, every chief actor in the French Revolution [of 1789-1799] was either JESUIT-educated, a [ROMAN] CATHOLIC prelate, or a member of the Illuminati Order [Ed. Note: a JESUIT front organization] where within the Jacobin Club they would come together to conspire and carry out the ‘Great Work’ – which in the open system of the Jacobins was the reflection of the complete hidden system of the Illuminati – and in back of the Illuminati were the hidden JESUIT ‘masters’.” – John Daniel (“The Grand Design Exposed”; 1999; Pages 212, 213)

“There are other secret and semi-secret organizations such as the International Bankers, the Council on Foreign Relations, the Bilderberger Group, [the] Club of Rome, the Trilateral Commission, the New Age Movement, the Illuminati, and Freemasonry, who are all deeply involved in global politics, and who actively promote the uniting of the people of our planet under a New World Order. However.these all are but mere ‘front’ organizations, behind which the true source of power [i.e., the JESUIT ORDER] hides, and uses [them] to distribute and channel its designs. And, as in any conspiracy, secrecy and shifting attention and blame away from itself is paramount to its success.” – John Daniel (“The Grand Design Exposed”; 1999; Page 9)

I highly recommend that you read John Daniel’s book “The Grand Design Exposed”. His 411-page paperback book makes a compelling case that the ROMAN CATHOLIC JESUIT ORDER took over the top levels of British and French Freemasonry. To order his book for $20 postpaid, please make check or postal money order payable to “American Sentry Books”, and mail it to: American Sentry Books // P.O. Box 14 // Crawley, WV 24931.

Well, someone may now ask: “Didn’t the mainstream media expose some of the horrible pedophilia in the Roman Catholic Church?” Yes, they did – but how could they not help but do so, since so much information was leaking out about it through numerous sources (such as many local newspapers)? They simply reported what was necessary to show that they were aware of the problem, and so that they would not lose total credibility with the American people!

NO, the “Masonic-Zionist Jews” do NOT control Hollywood or the mainstream media in America. They do NOT control international banking (although there are some wealthy Jews involved), the international intelligence community, or the New World Order itself! The JESUIT ORDER (which controls the Vatican, the wealthy and powerful Knights of Malta, and the top levels of Freemasonry) is the TOP PLAYER on the world’s geopolitical-financial-religious “chessboard”!

The following famous men warned us about the JESUIT ORDER:

“.They [i.e., the JESUITS] are a secret society, a sort of Masonic order with super added features of revolting odiousness, and a thousand times more dangerous. They are not merely priests, or priests of one religious creed; they are merchants, and lawyers, and editors, and men of any profession, having no outward badge (in this country [i.e., the USA]) by which to be recognized; they are about in all your society. .They [i.e., the JESUITS] are educated men, prepared, and sworn to start at any moment, and in any direction, and for any service, commanded by the general of their order [i.e., the Jesuit Superior General, the “Black Pope”], bound to NO family, community, or country, by the ordinary ties which bind men; and sold for life to the cause of the ROMAN PONTIFF.” – Samuel F.B. Morse (1791-1872; American inventor of the telegraph)

“My history of the JESUITS is not eloquently written, but it is supported by unquestionable authorities, is very particular and very horrible. Their restoration [i.e., the Jesuits’ reinstatement as a religious order by Pope Pius VII in 1814] is indeed a step toward darkness, cruelty, perfidy, despotism, [and] death. .I do not like the appearance of the JESUITS. If ever there was a body of men who merited eternal damnation on earth and in hell, it is this Society of Loyola’s [i.e., the Jesuits, the “Company”].” (1816; from a letter to Thomas Jefferson) John Adams (1735-1826; 2nd President of the United States)

“[The JESUITS] are the deadly enemies of civil and religious liberty.” R.W. Thompson (Ex-Secretary, American Navy)

“It is my opinion that if the liberties of this country – the United States of America – are destroyed, it will be by the subtlety of the ROMAN CATHOLIC JESUIT priests, for they are the most crafty, dangerous enemies to civil and religious liberty. They have instigated most of the wars of Europe.” – Marquis de Lafayette (1757-1834; French statesman and general)

NOTES added on October 20, 2007:
(1) I originally wrote this article on June 28, 2006. I finished this second update early this morning on Oct. 20, 2007. Nothing much has changed with that large section of the so-called “alternative media” that likes to blame”the Jews” for two world wars – and for allegedly running the “New World Order”. They continue to ignore “tons” of historical evidence that clearly shows that the Vatican-Papacy-Jesuit-Knights of Malta cabal was the fomenter of those two world wars – and is the “Number One Player” on the New World Order “chessboard”.
(2) Please do some research about this wealthy and powerful Vatican-Papacy-Jesuit-Knights of Malta cabal. At the end of a number of my writings posted on http://www.toughissues.org you will find quite a large number of recommended “informational tools”, such as DVDs, audiotapes, and books.

Please obtain as many as you can afford, and then share them with others. And here are some other websites that contain important information about the Vatican-Papacy-Jesuit-Knights of Malta cabal (I will try to list as many as I can remember – some of them have articles that deal with this cabal, and others have “broadcast/podcast interviews” of folks who have written about this cabal – and some of them recommend other resources for further research on this wealthy and powerful cabal):

(1) http://www.ctwilcox.com (Canadian actor and author C.T. Wilcox’s website; I highly recommend that you purchase a copy of his 345-page paperback book”The Transformation of the Republic”.)
(2) http://www.arcticbeacon.com (Broadcast host Greg Szymanski’s website)
(3) http://www.gordoncomstock.com (Podcast host “Gordon Comstock’s” website)
(4) http://www.vyzygoth.com (Broadcast host “Vyzygoth’s” website)
(5) http://www.vaticanassassins.org (Author Eric Jon Phelps’ website; I recommend that you purchase a copy of his CD-ROM “Vatican Assassins”.)
(6) http://www.vaticandesignexposed.com (Author John Daniel’s website; I recommend
that you purchase a copy of his 411-page paperback book “The Grand Design Exposed”.)
(7) http://www.bereanbeacon.org (Author Richard Bennett’s website; I recommend that you purchase a copy of his 58-minute color DVD “The Inquisition”.)
(9) http://www.chick.com (Chick Publications website; I recommend that you buy the book “The Secret History of the Jesuits” by Edmond Paris, and the book”Smokescreens” by Jack Chick, from them.)
(10) http://www.whitehorsemedia.com (Steve Wohlberg’s website; I recommend that you buy his book “End Time DELUSIONS”.)

NOTE: The above websites are NOT listed in any particular order – and my inclusion of each of them does NOT mean that I agree necessarily with EVERYTHING that may be posted on that particular website. If I have forgotten to list a good website of which I am aware that deals with the Vatican-Papacy-Jesuit-Knights of Malta cabal – or if I do not personally know of a particularly good website that deals with this cabal and thus failed to list it – then please FORGIVE me! And please do make good use of all the above-listed websites while they are STILL there. Powerful people want desperately to totally CONTROL the Internet, and they will no doubt SOON move to do so!

Lastly, I would like you to consider this following Bible verse – and a request from me:

“Who will rise up for me against the evildoers, or who will stand up for me against the workers of iniquity?” (Psalm 94:16)

REQUEST: Please print off copies of this article and give them to others. The truth about WHO is really running America MUST be told to the American people! If you received this article via E-Mail, then please forward the main text (from “BEGIN TEXT” to “END TEXT”) on to others. THANKS!

END TEXT.

I hope that the above information proves helpful. Again, the American people MUST be told WHO really is the TOP PLAYER on the geopolitical and financial scene today!

Psalm 94:16, Ephesians 5:11, and Ezekiel 22:30

In Christ,
Darryl Eberhart